Beyond Bigelow & BAASS, After AATIP and on To the Stars...

a reply to: mirageman

The easy way for Jeremy to totally resolve this would be to make the URLs visible and also show the full Vimeo file history.

I suspect he considers it beneath him but it’s an easy fix.

a reply to: mirageman

But his actions are suspect wouldn't you all say?

Just a wee bit.😉

a reply to: mirageman

Hmmm that's odd, why would a filmmaker use Vimeo to store video footage?

Surely you store it locally if your using Adobe or other editing software and not a streaming service?

a reply to: mirageman

Thanks for posting this.
Hmm gives one alot to think about.

a reply to: pigsy2400

We use vimeo for showing clients rough cuts etc. We don't use it as a clip library. It's a non standard proposal.

a reply to: pigsy2400

In the spirit of fairness here is a response made by the accused....



I'm not a video guy. But he never reveals the exact URL in this case. It just presents more questions to me...Especially what he claims to be doing and why.

His methods are suspect. His connections aren't. He's Joe Rogan's co-host these days isn't he?

We need to find an interview of Jeremy.. end of 2015-2016.

He has a big mouth....and thirsty for fortune and fame, I am certain in one of those interviews (Youtube) he hinted towards possession of the gofast video...

a reply to: celltypespecific


He was on Jimmy Church in early 2018, he walked around the issue of longer videos and if he had seen them or had them in his possession.

He made an odd comment that "if he had seen or had possession of such videos, he wouldn't know what classification level they would come under"

But that he hadn't seen them nor did he have them in his possession??

Isn't that an odd thing to say? This while gofast2015 Vimeo stuff makes that interview and statement seem even more....odd.

originally posted by: Catch_a_Fire
so all this talk of it simply being a new tech, from ourselves, was a little disheartening

Don't be disheartened... and don't believe it. All of that "oh it's just us" is just them covering their rear ends.

originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: celltypespecific


He was on Jimmy Church in early 2018, he walked around the issue of longer videos and if he had seen them or had them in his possession.

He made an odd comment that "if he had seen or had possession of such videos, he wouldn't know what classification level they would come under"

But that he hadn't seen them nor did he have them in his possession??

Isn't that an odd thing to say? This while gofast2015 Vimeo stuff makes that interview and statement seem even more....odd.

Very odd indeed....

a reply to: pigsy2400


Little pieces of the jigsaw abound.

If more people come forward to say they saw the GoFast video on Corbell's Vimeo channel in 2016, perhaps Corbell will finally have the courage to display the URLs.

We all saw the 'Happy Smiley People' photograph of Corbell as Delonge and Knapp's designated driver back in February 2015. Is that significant?

They were photographed together only a few weeks before the aforementioned Fightersweep.com article made the Nimitz incident public, and only a few weeks after the GoFast/Gimbal 'incident' on 21st January 2015 - itself occurring just six days before Delonge quit Blink182 to become a full-time Ufologist.

Is THAT significant? Who knows? Just throwing jigsaw pieces around.

I found the relevant section on Jimmy Church radio.....Feb 19th 2018.... before the TTSA release of the GoFast video...

Link to relevant conversation...



Oh Jeremy...just listen people He say ..if he had seen he wouldn't say he'd seen it.....I don't have possession that would be classified... doing something irresponsible by putting it out through unconventional means would be irresponsible....

Keep listening....

What did you get yourself into Jeremy?

a reply to: mirageman

The way that radar hooks onto the object is a thing of national security? This interview is 20th February 2018, TTSA didn't release the video until March of the same year.

Well the when the pilot that captured the gofast video gets a radar lockon and the pilot goes "woohoooooo got ittttt" and is the only video in which this happens.

Also of note, I think Doorbell is one of the only ones that describes appendages...

originally posted by: mirageman
I found the relevant section on Jimmy Church radio.....Feb 19th 2018.... before the TTSA release of the GoFast video...

Link to relevant conversation...

Oh Jeremy...just listen people He say ..if he had seen he wouldn't say he'd seen it.....I don't have possession that would be classified... doing something irresponsible by putting it out through unconventional means would be irresponsible....

Keep listening....

What did you get yourself into Jeremy?

Excellent... I was just about to post this....

JC " I know that there were many versions of footage taken that day...
Also Jeremy was very active on Reddit (now archive)

JC on reddit

JC on Reddit 2

In regards to many versions of the Tic Tac... the system CHBL description is below:

CHBL system

Highlights:
1. Multiple pilots observed docking of the Tic-Tac with the submerged USO via their "appendages"
2. Other pilots took video separate from the event associated with Fravor
3. Videos can't be released as its classified info as to how the radar locks on to targets
4. Important take home is that Fravor is not telling the complete story...he is leaving out info that would compromise national security secrets

originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: mirageman

The way that radar hooks onto the object is a thing of national security? This interview is 20th February 2018, TTSA didn't release the video until March of the same year.

Well the when the pilot that captured the gofast video gets a radar lockon and the pilot goes "woohoooooo got ittttt" and is the only video in which this happens.

Also of note, I think Doorbell is one of the only ones that describes appendages...

Fravor also mentioned the appendages along with Jason Turner

Skip 26:42

originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: mirageman

The way that radar hooks onto the object is a thing of national security? This interview is 20th February 2018, TTSA didn't release the video until March of the same year.

Well the when the pilot that captured the gofast video gets a radar lockon and the pilot goes "woohoooooo got ittttt" and is the only video in which this happens.

Also of note, I think Doorbell is one of the only ones that describes appendages...

The lock is a FLIR target lock. That's what the WSO is referencing.

HAPPY FRIDAY

Interest in "ufo navy" search term over time:



New Hampshire is Fravor's home state:



Not sure why PA Pittsburgh ranked so high...
San diego and Balitmore makes sense



Below is pretty convincing proof that disclosure happened Dec 16 2017.
As you can clearly see the interest in UAPs/UFO have never been higher!!



trends.google.com...

a reply to: celltypespecific

You are full of the joys of spring😁.

a reply to: mirageman

I'm afraid I can't view that video - seems to prevent embedding.

This could be interesting.........