It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Harte
My bad. I didn’t know I was talking to a moron. Keep living in the Nile. Denial! 😎🤣
The Rhind Papyrus, dating from around 1650 BCE, is a kind of instruction manual in arithmetic and geometry, and it gives us explicit demonstrations of how multiplication and division was carried out at that time. It also contains evidence of other mathematical knowledge, including unit fractions, composite and prime numbers, arithmetic, geometric and harmonic means, and how to solve first order linear equations as well as arithmetic and geometric series. The Berlin Papyrus, which dates from around 1300 BCE, shows that ancient Egyptians could solve second-order algebraic (quadratic) equations.
Romans didn’t come along until 5000 years after the Egyptians.
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Harte
My bad. I didn’t know I was talking to a moron. Keep living in the Nile. Denial! 😎🤣
The Rhind Papyrus, dating from around 1650 BCE, is a kind of instruction manual in arithmetic and geometry, and it gives us explicit demonstrations of how multiplication and division was carried out at that time. It also contains evidence of other mathematical knowledge, including unit fractions, composite and prime numbers, arithmetic, geometric and harmonic means, and how to solve first order linear equations as well as arithmetic and geometric series. The Berlin Papyrus, which dates from around 1300 BCE, shows that ancient Egyptians could solve second-order algebraic (quadratic) equations.
Romans didn’t come along until 5000 years after the Egyptians.
Because you know little about the subject, and apparently have never looked at the instructional problems the Rhind offers, you believe the above is evidence of "advanced" mathematics.
On the other hand, I majored in math, was a mechanical engineer for 20 years, and have taught advanced math, geometry, and physics in high school for the last 14 years.
I'm very comfortable with the knowledge on the subject of Egyptian mathematics that I have garnered over the decades of me looking at these claims, and I've been over all the problems in the Rhind Papyrus. If you ever decide to look at these problems, you'll find nothing whatsoever advanced about them.
In the meantime, I suppose you will continue your self-imposed ignorance and keep making a fool of yourself concerning subjects you know little or nothing about.
For example, what is 2,600 minus 1300?
Harte
originally posted by: sapien82
we say we can never do anything as precise.
originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Hanslune
720 tons couldn’t be carried by anything they built. It was too much weight. Not to mention upstream.
originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Hanslune
The mighty pyramid of Khufu silently speaks louder than the chatter of skeptics.
It is aligned to true geodetic North
and its location is found to be the center of the earth landmass.
This sort of precision entails a comprehensive knowledge of earth geography, e.g. mercator projection, which is something very unexpected of ancient Egypt.
As for its structure, engineers and scientists conclude that it is impossible to replicate the great pyramid despite the sophisticated technology we have now, given the structure’s immensity and staggering precision.
In the summer of the year 1994, archaeologists made a sensational discovery at Faiyum. They discovered subterranean tombs with mummies that dated from around the year 6000 BC, and which have been studied in genetic labs. It was discovered that the DNA of these mummies presented, in some sequences, differences from the human genotype .
The differences were major, and they could not have resulted from simple genetic mutations. So, the conclusion is that these mummies did not have human origins. Also presenting some human characteristics, but not entirely, they could have only resulted through mixes between different species, between terrestrial species and extraterrestrial species.
originally posted by: fromunclexcommunicate
a reply to: Hanslune
I went searching for more information with some mathematical corroboration for the engineering details in your post and got this.
Not going to win any debates with Harte using the Rhind papyrus and X-files Gethsemane episode coincidence now are we?
originally posted by: fromunclexcommunicate
a reply to: Hanslune
The purpose of the trial chamber site was probably to verify the pyramid position thousands of years later without having to desecrate the actual grave site within the Great Pyramid.
originally posted by: fromunclexcommunicateThey may have chosen the 30 degrees north latitude site after seeing locations further south might lay on the less stable East African rift.
originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Hanslune
Yes it is! The Great Pyramid is located at the exact intersection of the longest line of latitude and the longest line of longitude which is at the exact center of all the landmass on planet Earth!
Just because you say it isn’t true doesn’t make you right, obviously. That 3/60th of a degree that it is off is due to an earthquake.
Evidence? It’s scientifically documented under Faiyum DNA and Genotypes.