Alleged Unseen NASA Apollo 11 Faked Studio Moon Landing Video Montage Appears Online

a reply to: tovenar

Except there is photographic, 16mm and live TV footage of actual people in the places where the hardware can be found, leaving the same trails that can now be seen in modern images. Those images can be dated precisely thanks to the images of Earth they took and broadcast. The surface imagery shows small rocks and craters not known about in advance but that show up in probes from multiple countries.

The only reason we have not gone beyond Earth orbit since Apollo is because of the money it takes to get people there - money that as thrown at it during Apollo. The VAB are no impediment to travel if you are prepared enough.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: studio500

A short video has appeared on Youtube that appears to show how the Apollo moon landing was faked.

Either that or it's the Capricorn One film set inter-spliced with NASA footage.

Capricorn One

One of your images.

booya was about to pull that up myself,

originally posted by: roadgravel
There are Americans who have and still will rise above the level many here accept as impossible. It's happening whether believed or not.

The naysayers can go back to chanting make America great again and wishing while others do.

Is the political tilt necessary?

So the overall assumption is we went all the way to the Moon and even film the surface from above but never landed?

Must have been some cold war thing to show the Russians that we were better than they were.

a reply to: BigDave-AR

Someone replied the Russians politics and cold war wasn't real which i saw as an implication the US political machine was in on it.

edit:

I wouldn't say the idea of America great/better/whatever again is solely political.

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: BigDave-AR

Someone replied the Russians politics and cold war wasn't real which i saw as an implication the US political machine was in on it.

edit:

I wouldn't say the idea of America great/better/whatever again is solely political.

I apologize I misread ya and hadn’t seen the other BS carry on.

a reply to: BigDave-AR

No escape from it around here. I really should have phrased it different though. Anyway, the country can do some amazing things when the people put there mind to it and are allowed to go for it.

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: BigDave-AR

No escape from it around here. I really should have phrased it different though. Anyway, the country can do some amazing things when the people put there mind to it and are allowed to go for it.

No worries for some reason I had interperetted it erroneously as a knock at consvervatives not contributing as much to efforrts like the space program. I’m not firing on all cylinders today.

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: IAMNOTYOU

ok - EXACTLY how many people are required to hoax it ?? [ while keeping the majority of plebs working in the program ignorant ] ???????

his " argument " commes up a lot - and falls apart every time

starting at the botttom the saturn 5 rocket S1 & 2 - there is no denying that [ unless you are going to go full retard - with some batcrap ]

given that S 1 & 2 worked - why not S3 [ this was required to get the " top section " out of earth orbit and do the TLI - trans lunar injection ]

the CM [ command module ] - worked [ i that it provideded a lifesupport system for 3 men in space - for the mission duration - and allowed safe return to earth

again - " most " appollo hoax proponents claim the CM was parked in soome earth orbit - for the mission duration - with the astronauts aboard

all the " ancillary " subsystems of the " top section " - worked - as

this leaves the LEM - its specifications - and design - were conceieve by a teamm - of exactly the same calibre of skills experience and tallents - that designed all the sub-systems that did work

it was fabricated and assembled - by multiple teams of highly competent engineers - and each sub-assembly - tested - to ensure that it would function " as designed "

take a simple sub-unit - like say - the landing legs :

the design spec was - to simpplify - allow the LEM to touch down safley - at a range of velociotes specified - wile limiting " peak force / decelaeration " - to a speciified limit - oh - and have a mass limit for each leg - and be foldable // automatically deploy

simple - the legs were delivered - and fullfilled all requirements - anbd were inspected tested

this was repeated - for every sub-system

the finished complete LEM was under the mass limit - and within size specs

so - why would it not work ???

and the killer - if it would work - why the need to fake ????????????????

dont embarras yourself with crap lke van allen radiation - hint - why did so many appollo veterans develope catarcts // cancers ????

the VAB transit - was a calculated risk - everyone survived - but it had long tem implications on several astronauts health

bottom like - everything worked - no reason to fake

and the evidence supports the veracity of the landings .

PS - just for completenes - what is your " motive to fake " ???????????

All i sad was that we are on a site, where most people believe that a very small group of people, secretly, rules the world without people ever knowing that they are "slaves" to the elite. So saying 500000 people couldnt be fooled, is just not true - it can happen.

Then i also said that i just DONT KNOW, we are on a need to know basis, and we are told lies all the time, for the sake of security ofcourse...., so i cant trust ANYTHING iam told from goverment or agencies, how can i ever be sure they are telling the truth about anything?
So, i understand the doubt, and wouldnt be suprised if it was either truth or not.

And the motive, well USSR was way ahead in the space race, and the USA needed something to not loose face to them. So yes, there was a motive

a reply to: IAMNOTYOU

And the motive, well USSR was way ahead in the space race, and the USA needed something to not loose face to them. So yes, there was a motive

so - in order to " save face " - they instigated a hoax - that if - had they been caught - would have caused utter hummiliataion

you really need to think this through

a reply to: studio500

I've seen too many scientist's saying no one could survive going to the moon,especially in the space capsule they have shown,no more safer then taking a passenger vehicle up these,plus the fact the moon is inhabited,government never though anyone would check their story

Someone else got a link? Video has been removed.

Buzz tells eight year old girl they never went.
It is hard to lie to children.


There is always a line that joins the mountains to the terrain as if mountains are early examples of photo-shopping. I doubt they went there because of the length of time passed and not going back.

a reply to: AthlonSavage

Buzz needs to be de-briefed and re-programed again.

originally posted by: AthlonSavage
Buzz tells eight year old girl they never went.
It is hard to lie to children.

There is always a line that joins the mountains to the terrain as if mountains are early examples of photo-shopping. I doubt they went there because of the length of time passed and not going back.

When he says "we didn't go there" he means to say "we did not go in that direction", he references the question, why the US did not go back? So he says "we didn't go there", as in "we did not follow that road after that", or when you are arguing with someone and they say "remember this from last year" and you say "don't even go there". That's simple stuff but can be taken out of context easily

If he had said "we didn't go in the first place" then you could have something

originally posted by: AthlonSavage
Buzz tells eight year old girl they never went.
It is hard to lie to children.

There is always a line that joins the mountains to the terrain as if mountains are early examples of photo-shopping. I doubt they went there because of the length of time passed and not going back.

But taking things out of context and lying to adults is pretty easy eh buddy?

originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: studio500

I've seen too many scientist's saying no one could survive going to the moon,especially in the space capsule they have shown,no more safer then taking a passenger vehicle up these,plus the fact the moon is inhabited,government never though anyone would check their story

You have not seen any actual scientists say anything of the kind.

originally posted by: AthlonSavage

There is always a line that joins the mountains to the terrain as if mountains are early examples of photo-shopping.

This is just undulations in terrain. Every time I see some hoaxer claim that there is a line indicating a backdrop it is usually pretty easy to find out the features causing that line, or even find footage and photographs from the other side of it.

Why no stars in the Apollo footage? Stars should be even clearer in a vacuum.

Unless it was all fake, and their primitive computers couldn't calculate what every scene's "sky" should look like. So they just left it blank. Stanley K. Told them to lie boldly