Alleged Unseen NASA Apollo 11 Faked Studio Moon Landing Video Montage Appears Online

A short video has appeared on Youtube that appears to show how the Apollo moon landing was faked.

The Leaked footage supposedly obtained from the cutting room floor of NASA film studios, shows that the moon landing was faked according to the poster.

Other claims have been made relating to the montage but I'll leave judgement to those more familiar with this particular conspiracy theory as to the validity of this film.

Here's the video, which at the time of posting, had just 443 views.

a reply to: studio500

VERY interesting I must say. I personally choose to believe we went to the moon. But the conspiracy theorist in me has always questioned it.

So my question would be why add sound that’s obviously not related to the film content.

its seems odd that its all spliced together footage with differing audio and vido and what appears to be added on film grain in some parts, there has always been a debate as to the validity that we went, which i believe myself, does this video provide enough opposition to those facts, i am not sure

but S+F to OP for a new video take on said events

a reply to: Allaroundyou

I'm with you there.
I've seen plenty of compelling post and videos for and against here on ATS which leaves me firmly stuck on the fence.

I get the feeling that this video may simply be a construct from many other sources, simply by the way the video has been re-edited and stuck together.

Some of the footage appears to have been filmed in a studio and some in a desert, yet I can't really see anything Apollo related in the desert, or perhaps I'm not looking hard enough.

Personally, I have no idea if any of this footage is unseen, or just more regurgitation of same old same old.

I eagerly await the input of some of our more knowledgeable members who have studied this subject in far more depth than I.

If anyone can prove or disprove this footage it will be ATS and its members.

Here's a few stills for those unable to view the video at present.



























i

originally posted by: UpIsNowDown
its seems odd that its all spliced together footage with differing audio and vido and what appears to be added on film grain in some parts, there has always been a debate as to the validity that we went, which i believe myself, does this video provide enough opposition to those facts, i am not sure

but S+F to OP for a new video take on said events

My thoughts too. There's something weird in the way it has been edited, hence why I called it a montage.

The audio sounds almost too good and too clear to be true too.

The scenes are all chopped up into small pieces and scattered around. I have my doubts on the validity for that alone, but as I'm not too familiar with the intricacies of any of the Apollo footage, I'll admit I haven't a clue if anything here is legit or not.

Look at the replica of the moon surface at 10.40 it looks exactly same as moon surface the lunar lander came down on. The whole moon mission would of certainly be faked with the budget they had at their disposal.

originally posted by: avgguy
So my question would be why add sound that’s obviously not related to the film content.

One answer could be that it's simply a Youtube creation, designed simply to get views.

I've noticed a few news media sources have picked up on the video too here in the Uk.

The Youtube poster I have linked to, has a couple of other dubious videos on his channel but I have no idea if he is the original source for this, or if he's simply copied the video from another source.

If he is the original poster, then I see little credibility here.

www.youtube.com...

I think I have seen this on here before - I believe the explanation was that it is from a film - I cannot remember which film though. And you can imagine what happens when I type 'faked moon landing footage' into the ATS search engine - I get a load of results back about dancing cats.

Some of it looks like it's right out of Capricorn One movie.

originally posted by: and14263
I think I have seen this on here before - I believe the explanation was that it is from a film - I cannot remember which film though. And you can imagine what happens when I type 'faked moon landing footage' into the ATS search engine - I get a load of results back about dancing cats.

Same here when I did a pre post search

a reply to: studio500

A short video has appeared on Youtube that appears to show how the Apollo moon landing was faked.

Either that or it's the Capricorn One film set inter-spliced with NASA footage.

Capricorn One


One of your images.

To me it looks like footage of training nothing more

a reply to: studio500

notime to watch properly - but can the OP or " anyone " - coherently explain why this is evidence that the appollo missions were hoaxed ?

Appears fake to me, the overlay UI in some parts looks very modern and move smooth and more fps, and the sound does not match, and there are no revealing shots, there are some footage of the old prototype lander but that is no secret. Looks like a fun project someone had.. not very professional made, anyone could make this.
And no I am not a NASA payed debunker

Starting from about 1:21 into the video, it's clearly a still image of an astronaut, until someone says 'action', then the footage resumes - it's clear as day,



I don't need to watch all thirteen minutes to know it's nonsense.

Keep on looking though, the more stones that get flipped the better the chances of finding the juicy stuff,

Yeah, it looks like a modern video with an aging effect added with shots of the Moon landing spliced in. Its a fake video, 100%.

a reply to: studio500

There is an obvious clue that this is fake.

The " Moon Buggy " was used on the Apollo 11 mission.

originally posted by: MerkabaTribeEntity
Starting from about 1:21 into the video, it's clearly a still image of an astronaut, until someone says 'action', then the footage resumes - it's clear as day,

Did you watch any of it or did you just read and then copy and paste the first comment?
Lol.
Or maybe you are the author of the first (top) comment on that page??