Alleged Unseen NASA Apollo 11 Faked Studio Moon Landing Video Montage Appears Online

Prob from the new first man movie that is coming out that supposedly is horrible...

a reply to: studio500

I've always questioned the moon landings mostly the first one, won't go into it to deep right now but I do think at the very least the first one was faked, you have to put your mind into Americans of that era both military and civilians, Russia at that time were steaming ahead, they had put men into orbit, they had already put Sputnik into orbit and military minds believed and media were talking about this could be a test run for a weapon put into orbit so American was running behind big time and so lets think that Nixon then Kennedy wouldn't accept the idea of faking the first one after so many failures to get into space let alone to the moon and with Russia talking about a base on the moon America, in the nicest way possible to my cousins across the water, hate to be behind other countries in big things so yeah I do think at the least the first was faked but this video doesn't really add much, I do think it looks interesting and has some value (what I can't really put into words) but whether its concrete proof to the "did/didn't" isn't really easy to work out.

But like I said, it was an interesting watch.

Need we go on?

when you see the astronomers bounce when walking.

That's either people talking over a moon shot or the film had to be slowed down. If you slow down the film, wouldn't the voices be slowed down or dubbed afterwords?

a reply to: SocratesJohnson

There are genuine pieces of Apollo footage - check the way soil moves when they disturb it on the ground. The rest of it is from the making of Capricorn One.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Nice work,

a reply to: MerkabaTribeEntity

Thanks

Here are some more, because there are people who just won't see it.

and a final three, I'm bored of it now - two of the images are from a different, slightly longer version of the 'making of' video here:










Seriously if you still think this fraudulent piece of **** is any way a genuine piece of evidence against the Apollo landings you need help.

e2a: No sooner had I posted links to those Capricorn One images on the youtube channel than the video mysteriously disappears. Job done.

I'm pretty sure we went to the moon, but not 100% convinced. You can give me all the reasons why it wasn't faked, but, with some imagination, I can come up with ways that it could have been an elaborate hoax. I don't care how many people were involved, a fake mission could have been pulled off. Objects could have been placed on the moon remotely, radio transmissions could have been sent from LEO, etc.. Perhaps most of the missions were real, and only the first was faked, or portions of it dramatized. Only a few people needed to be in on the secret, and they might have had good reason to remain silent. There are multiple reasons why a fake mission could have been important, or even necessary.

This is one of my favorite conspiracy theories, go ahead and flame me for wanting explore all possibilities.

I was unable to watch the video, it was probably removed for copyright infringement (Capricorn One)

originally posted by: seattlerat
I'm pretty sure we went to the moon, but not 100% convinced. You can give me all the reasons why it wasn't faked, but, with some imagination, I can come up with ways that it could have been an elaborate hoax. I don't care how many people were involved, a fake mission could have been pulled off. Objects could have been placed on the moon remotely, radio transmissions could have been sent from LEO, etc.. Perhaps most of the missions were real, and only the first was faked, or portions of it dramatized. Only a few people needed to be in on the secret, and they might have had good reason to remain silent. There are multiple reasons why a fake mission could have been important, or even necessary.

There are indeed persuasive arguments as to why there could have been a motive for faking the missions. However the evidence from those missions that they actually happened as documented is unshakable. Not all of the hardware on the moon could have been placed by robot, and no evidence exists that there was a robot. There is evidence of astronauts placing that hardware, together with time and date specific photographs of Earth and live TV broadcasts showing details not available until the missions. Probes from Japan, India and China as well as the USA have shown details of the hardware and trails between that hardware exactly matching the Apollo photographic record. Not one of the many geologists who have examined Apollo's lunar samples have ever queried their provenance.

This is one of my favorite conspiracy theories, go ahead and flame me for wanting explore all possibilities.

I was unable to watch the video, it was probably removed for copyright infringement (Capricorn One)

If it was removed for copyright reasons it would say so. It was removed because the channel owner (a fully fledged flat earth anti-vaxxer loon) had it proven that it was a fraud and didn't have the cojones to defend it.

originally posted by: seattlerat

I was unable to watch the video, it was probably removed for copyright infringement (Capricorn One)

no - " removed by user "

it did this - because its fraud was exposed

and further - there is suspicion - that the account is just a sock puppet for " eric dubay " - grade 2 cockwomble & flat earth cultist

This video has already been removed by the user so does anyone know where else it might be found? Thank you

a reply to: studio500

Mythbusters busted this... as well as readily available information

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: studio500

Americans have walked on the moon 6 times. This involved close to 1/2 a million people to get us there. If we didn't go. Don't you think that some of those people would of come forward and said, "yeah we faked it?"
That's not the only problem with this line of thinking. They wouldn't just be saying they faked it once. But they would of had to have faked it 6 times. 6 times!

Total bs.

Some people seems to believe, that the USA president election was fake and controlled by russia, in favor of Trump, others believe that Clinton tried to cheat. Anyways, this involve the ENTIRE USA, and yet it is somehow very easy to fool the american people, because it only involves a few key players at the top..

I dont think it is a valid point, that it couldnt be hidden from people working on this. ofcourse it could

Did we go or not? I dont know, but i do know they keep secrets, which means they are not telling the truth, in other words they lie to us - so basicly i dont trust anything they say, and there is a lot of suspect things about the moon landings, and a good motive to fake it, so i wouldnt be suprised if it was all fake!

if iit [ the appollo program was a hoax - and thats an hypthetical " IF " :

why do moon hoax proponents keep getting caught peddling lies - like this one ?????????????

Or is It bastardized footage of NASA testing moon landing equipment and gear on earth.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: studio500

Americans have walked on the moon 6 times. This involved close to 1/2 a million people to get us there.

If we didn't go. Don't you think that some of those people would of come forward and said, "yeah we faked it?"



Total bs.

Holy crap take some logic pills.

If we didn't go, then there weren't half a million people getting us there.

I believe we went to the moon, so I'm not arguing with you about that. Just saying, if you're going to refute "we faked the moon landing" people, don't do it by sounding like a kindergartener.

Here's some alleged authentic footage



You can see that great big flat earth in the background !

Contained in video :
flag waving in studio air ,
exposed wiring .

a reply to: IAMNOTYOU

ok - EXACTLY how many people are required to hoax it ?? [ while keeping the majority of plebs working in the program ignorant ] ???????

his " argument " commes up a lot - and falls apart every time

starting at the botttom the saturn 5 rocket S1 & 2 - there is no denying that [ unless you are going to go full retard - with some batcrap ]

given that S 1 & 2 worked - why not S3 [ this was required to get the " top section " out of earth orbit and do the TLI - trans lunar injection ]

the CM [ command module ] - worked [ i that it provideded a lifesupport system for 3 men in space - for the mission duration - and allowed safe return to earth

again - " most " appollo hoax proponents claim the CM was parked in soome earth orbit - for the mission duration - with the astronauts aboard

all the " ancillary " subsystems of the " top section " - worked - as

this leaves the LEM - its specifications - and design - were conceieve by a teamm - of exactly the same calibre of skills experience and tallents - that designed all the sub-systems that did work

it was fabricated and assembled - by multiple teams of highly competent engineers - and each sub-assembly - tested - to ensure that it would function " as designed "

take a simple sub-unit - like say - the landing legs :

the design spec was - to simpplify - allow the LEM to touch down safley - at a range of velociotes specified - wile limiting " peak force / decelaeration " - to a speciified limit - oh - and have a mass limit for each leg - and be foldable // automatically deploy

simple - the legs were delivered - and fullfilled all requirements - anbd were inspected tested

this was repeated - for every sub-system

the finished complete LEM was under the mass limit - and within size specs

so - why would it not work ???

and the killer - if it would work - why the need to fake ????????????????

dont embarras yourself with crap lke van allen radiation - hint - why did so many appollo veterans develope catarcts // cancers ????

the VAB transit - was a calculated risk - everyone survived - but it had long tem implications on several astronauts health

bottom like - everything worked - no reason to fake

and the evidence supports the veracity of the landings .

PS - just for completenes - what is your " motive to fake " ???????????

a reply to: DoctorBluechip

All genuine, and every image of Earth in it can be verified by satellite weather photographs.