It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: WarPig1939
Thank God we don't live in Victorian times getting all giddy due to an ankle.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: InTheLight
My 'argument' would bury you so deep it would take weeks to extract yourself! You, on the other hand, are just talking out of your backside, and I would even wager you are even saying things you know to be false just for the sake of arguing the point. Trust me, you don't want to debate this point, not with me anyway. No bravado here, because I actually worked in (and still do to a degree) the media industry. I know how it works, and more to the point, I know how advertising works. It is advertising, after all, which pays EVERYONE's salaries on these and virtually every single second of content you see on television and on radio! Without advertising sponsorship these programs cease to exist...overnight!
Just look at the Rosanne cancellation by ABC. ABC could care less if they pissed off viewers; that's the last thing on Earth they care about. However, they cancelled that program because ADVERTISERs pulled out...and worse, those same advertiser's threatened to pull ads on OTHER programs as well if they didn't cancel it. Now they CARE very much about that!! If you think it's about anything other than money you'd be sorely mistaken!!
They know EXACTLY who's watching, and they know when. Again, don't be foolish.
originally posted by: WarPig1939
a reply to: InTheLight
( Physical ) attraction. Having good physical traits does not mean sexual objectification. Good lord, are you sure you have the right definition of what makes the opposite sexes attract each other? It's called physical attributes and showing them off is a way of getting noticed. Not in a sexual way. Wow... I can't believe I am explaining this.
It's a natural human thing to do and shouldn't be shamed because some people think that it has be sexually related
originally posted by: WarPig1939
a reply to: InTheLight
So you should be ok with a woman in a swim suit if they want to because it is their way of showing their physical attributes that in no way is resembling sexual objectification. Right?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: WarPig1939
Thank God we don't live in Victorian times getting all giddy due to an ankle.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
I'm surprised this is still a thing. Who even watches this crap anymore? Society has evolved past this inane competition.
Bull pooky.
Hot babes are still hot babes. We aren't "evolved". We aren't "enlightened".
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
I'm surprised this is still a thing. Who even watches this crap anymore? Society has evolved past this inane competition.
Bull pooky.
Hot babes are still hot babes. We aren't "evolved". We aren't "enlightened".
Yeah but we came up with the internet.
Social evolution.
originally posted by: WarPig1939
a reply to: InTheLight
Hey I'm not losing anything. I was merely stating how draconian they were going with it to advance their social advocacy platform. I got other things to occupy my time other than being told "This is how women are supposed to behave or talk about."
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
I'm surprised this is still a thing. Who even watches this crap anymore? Society has evolved past this inane competition.
Bull pooky.
Hot babes are still hot babes. We aren't "evolved". We aren't "enlightened".
Yeah but we came up with the internet.
Social evolution.
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
I'm surprised this is still a thing. Who even watches this crap anymore? Society has evolved past this inane competition.
Bull pooky.
Hot babes are still hot babes. We aren't "evolved". We aren't "enlightened".
Yeah but we came up with the internet.
Social evolution.
There you go T&A gallore, no need to watch or comment on what beauty pageants are doing, now is there?
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
I'm surprised this is still a thing. Who even watches this crap anymore? Society has evolved past this inane competition.
Bull pooky.
Hot babes are still hot babes. We aren't "evolved". We aren't "enlightened".
Yeah but we came up with the internet.
Social evolution.
There you go T&A gallore, no need to watch or comment on what beauty pageants are doing, now is there?
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
I'm surprised this is still a thing. Who even watches this crap anymore? Society has evolved past this inane competition.
Bull pooky.
Hot babes are still hot babes. We aren't "evolved". We aren't "enlightened".
Yeah but we came up with the internet.
Social evolution.
There you go T&A gallore, no need to watch or comment on what beauty pageants are doing, now is there?
Exactly. We've evolved past that. Do boys even look forward to the Sear's Wish Book today? I doubt it.