It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
a reply to: gortex
Hahahi hope this breaks the hoe. I imagine she will be real quiet from here on out.
Your comment speaks volumes about your stance on this.
Yuck.
You mean my stance on people upholding their legal obligation?? You mean my stance on people paying the consequences of breaking their legal binding agreements?
Yea I’m a disgusting person.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: butcherguy
Then why is Trump trying to hide that it happened and even lying about it? What did he have to hide if he's in an open relationship?
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: GuidedKill
This lawsuit has merit all day long and as of now she owes 20 million. Do you think she has 20 million? I don’t, therefore she is quiet from here on out.
Until it goes to court and the judgement is given she owes nothing.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
a reply to: gortex
Hahahi hope this breaks the hoe. I imagine she will be real quiet from here on out.
Your comment speaks volumes about your stance on this.
Yuck.
You mean my stance on people upholding their legal obligation?? You mean my stance on people paying the consequences of breaking their legal binding agreements?
Yea I’m a disgusting person.
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
a reply to: gortex
Hahahi hope this breaks the hoe. I imagine she will be real quiet from here on out.
Your comment speaks volumes about your stance on this.
Yuck.
You mean my stance on people upholding their legal obligation?? You mean my stance on people paying the consequences of breaking their legal binding agreements?
Yea I’m a disgusting person.
Isn't sexual fidelity in marriage a "legally binding agreement"?
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
a reply to: gortex
Hahahi hope this breaks the hoe. I imagine she will be real quiet from here on out.
Your comment speaks volumes about your stance on this.
Yuck.
You mean my stance on people upholding their legal obligation?? You mean my stance on people paying the consequences of breaking their legal binding agreements?
Yea I’m a disgusting person.
I was referring to your use of the word 'hoe', which was classy of you. Not. Thanks for admitting what you are though.
As for the legal obligation, I have severe doubts about how good Trump's lawyer is. The lack of Trump's signature is rather telling and she might have a stronger case than you fear she has.
This whole thing is very amusing however, especially as the $20 million suit from Trump basically confirms that he cheated on his wife repeatedly and has the moral standing of a weasel.
But then all but the most delusional Trumpettes already knew that.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
a reply to: gortex
Hahahi hope this breaks the hoe. I imagine she will be real quiet from here on out.
Your comment speaks volumes about your stance on this.
Yuck.
You mean my stance on people upholding their legal obligation?? You mean my stance on people paying the consequences of breaking their legal binding agreements?
Yea I’m a disgusting person.
I was referring to your use of the word 'hoe', which was classy of you. Not. Thanks for admitting what you are though.
As for the legal obligation, I have severe doubts about how good Trump's lawyer is. The lack of Trump's signature is rather telling and she might have a stronger case than you fear she has.
This whole thing is very amusing however, especially as the $20 million suit from Trump basically confirms that he cheated on his wife repeatedly and has the moral standing of a weasel.
But then all but the most delusional Trumpettes already knew that.
So she doesn’t get paid to have sex?? I thought that’s what stormy did for a living... color me shocked!!
She is the one who was asked not to disclose, signed the agreement and cashed the check. That agreement is binding on her end no matter if yoda signed it.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: odzeandennz
Who wants someone with good character in office? It's not like someones character defines who they are or anything, right?
No doubt but do you want to fight something for 20 million when you you violated the legal ageeement you signed and already cashed the check for.
originally posted by: badw0lf
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: odzeandennz
Who wants someone with good character in office? It's not like someones character defines who they are or anything, right?
Where was this concept for the last god knows how many people in office.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: GuidedKill
No doubt but do you want to fight something for 20 million when you you violated the legal ageeement you signed and already cashed the check for.
The bigger question is does the President want to go to court where questions will be asked about the payment made for the silence of Ms Daniels and where the money for that payment actually came from.
The case could be a bigger problem for Trump than Daniels.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
a reply to: gortex
Hahahi hope this breaks the hoe. I imagine she will be real quiet from here on out.
Your comment speaks volumes about your stance on this.
Yuck.
You mean my stance on people upholding their legal obligation?? You mean my stance on people paying the consequences of breaking their legal binding agreements?
Yea I’m a disgusting person.
Isn't sexual fidelity in marriage a "legally binding agreement"?
Yup between him and Melania...it’s up to her and Donald to discuss that. Has nothing to do with you Me or the 100 grand hooker.
Mind your own business.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
a reply to: gortex
Hahahi hope this breaks the hoe. I imagine she will be real quiet from here on out.
Your comment speaks volumes about your stance on this.
Yuck.
You mean my stance on people upholding their legal obligation?? You mean my stance on people paying the consequences of breaking their legal binding agreements?
Yea I’m a disgusting person.
I was referring to your use of the word 'hoe', which was classy of you. Not. Thanks for admitting what you are though.
As for the legal obligation, I have severe doubts about how good Trump's lawyer is. The lack of Trump's signature is rather telling and she might have a stronger case than you fear she has.
This whole thing is very amusing however, especially as the $20 million suit from Trump basically confirms that he cheated on his wife repeatedly and has the moral standing of a weasel.
But then all but the most delusional Trumpettes already knew that.
So she doesn’t get paid to have sex?? I thought that’s what stormy did for a living... color me shocked!!
She is the one who was asked not to disclose, signed the agreement and cashed the check. That agreement is binding on her end no matter if yoda signed it.
Please become a lawyer and try and argue this. Please please please. I want to sell tickets to watch the face of the judge.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: GuidedKill
No doubt but do you want to fight something for 20 million when you you violated the legal ageeement you signed and already cashed the check for.
The bigger question is does the President want to go to court where questions will be asked about the payment made for the silence of Ms Daniels and where the money for that payment actually came from.
The case could be a bigger problem for Trump than Daniels.
it would never happen until after his term/terms are up.
just a media ploy
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: GuidedKill
a reply to: gortex
Hahahi hope this breaks the hoe. I imagine she will be real quiet from here on out.
Your comment speaks volumes about your stance on this.
Yuck.
You mean my stance on people upholding their legal obligation?? You mean my stance on people paying the consequences of breaking their legal binding agreements?
Yea I’m a disgusting person.
Isn't sexual fidelity in marriage a "legally binding agreement"?
Yup between him and Melania...it’s up to her and Donald to discuss that. Has nothing to do with you Me or the 100 grand hooker.
Mind your own business.
Lol. You said his mistress is breaking an agreement with Trump and I respond that Trump is breaking his agreement with his third wife. And you tell me to mind my own business.