US President Hits Porn Actress with $20 million Lawsuit

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: network dude

Does this behavior puzzle, you? Is this something you never thought Trump would be a part of? is this out of character for him?

No. Expected nothing less to be honest.

the new deflection on the twittersphere is that the voters didn't vote because of his 'character'

im going to hate the taste of popcorn after this farcical presidency.

a reply to: odzeandennz

Who wants someone with good character in office? It's not like someones character defines who they are or anything, right?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: intrptr

Defamation of character.

But Donald Trump has no character.

That may be, in your opinion. But it does seem he has a legally binding contract with her. She's going to lose in any court and lose big if she continues.

originally posted by: odzeandennz
the new deflection on the twittersphere is that the voters didn't vote because of his 'character'

im going to hate the taste of popcorn after this farcical presidency.

That is literally his only asset. He is a cult of personality who was voted in because of his character alone. Outside of building a wall (and having mexico pay for it), he didn't have any real stances...well, unless winning bigly is somehow a policy.

But...now here is the question...

Does all the cheating and infidelity and whatnot go against the cult of personality he has nurtured? no...I don't think so. I think this is part of who they seen him to begin with. a slimy cheating troll who is put in place not to somehow elevate America, but mostly to "pwn the libs".

I hate politics...I really do. I remember as a child politics was heated, but it was always between who has the best policy considerations and the competitors were friendly to each other, if not friends, that simply had different views on whats the best path towards progress for we the people....now its no longer about finding the best, its now about smashing the other side into humiliation and will gladly put in a antichrist if it pisses off the other team.

a reply to: MiddleInsite

I really couldn't care less if he nailed her on the white house lawn as long as it doesn't affect him doing things he has said he would do

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: intrptr

Defamation of character.

But Donald Trump has no character.

That may be, in your opinion. But it does seem he has a legally binding contract with her. She's going to lose in any court and lose big if she continues.

She will lose the ND money and may also have to pay a little extra on top of that along with legal fees.

Then she will be inundated with money and deals that will make the paultry sum seem like lunch money to a toddler by comparison.

Harvey Weinstein's NDAs meant little in the end.

originally posted by: torok67
a reply to: MiddleInsite

I really couldn't care less if he nailed her on the white house lawn as long as it doesn't affect him doing things he has said he would do

Seems it is effecting his things...mexico has yet to cut that check, Obamacare still a thing, Dreamers got a new deal.

Are you tired of winning yet?

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: gortex

this soap opera keeps getting better and better.

moral of the story, dont pay for it...

Even more to the point, don't pay for it while running for president, representing the party known for sexual repression and being anti-sex work.

a reply to: SaturnFX

That is literally his only asset. He is a cult of personality who was voted in because of his character alone.

He was voted in because he was not hillary.
Thats it.
No big secret.
No big expectations.
In fact he has the lowest expectation bar EVER.

originally posted by: torok67
a reply to: MiddleInsite

I really couldn't care less if he nailed her on the white house lawn as long as it doesn't affect him doing things he has said he would do

Even if it proves he did things he said he didn't do?

If he lies about what he did do, what makes you invest hope he will do what he says he is going to do?

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: odzeandennz

Who wants someone with good character in office? It's not like someones character defines who they are or anything, right?

When you find that unicorn make sure to take a picture, or no one will believe you.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: SaturnFX

That is literally his only asset. He is a cult of personality who was voted in because of his character alone.

He was voted in because he was not hillary.
Thats it.
No big secret.
No big expectations.
In fact he has the lowest expectation bar EVER.

Nope
He was voted in because he wasn't:
McCain
Jeb
Cruz
Rubio
Carson
etc etc....lets not pretend he was the only choice...he rode high on the republican list because of who he was...a loud character who was gonna stick it to the establishment.

The latest now by people embarassed at what has become are shielding their choices by saying...oh...well we would have voted in a walrus vs the opposition...but that doesn't hold weight because there was primaries to begin with.

No, most ppl voted Don because of Don and his "magnetic" personality (sticky is more like it).

In saying that, we are experiencing a decent economy...and I will give props to Don for some of it at this point.
I will also point out we are in a highly unsustainable bubble that will burst bigly...so I will give props to Don on that also when it happens as the burst and bust economy is what we were trying to veer away from overall...a steady growth is preferred for stability.

But hey, while its here, get what you can and stuff it away. Winter is coming.

a reply to: SaturnFX

You contradict even yourself...
this

He was voted in because he wasn't: McCain Jeb Cruz Rubio Carson etc etc....lets not pretend he was the only choice...he rode high on the republican list because of who he was...a loud character who was gonna stick it to the establishment.

doesnt equal this

No, most ppl voted Don because of Don and his "magnetic" personality (sticky is more like it).

You want to complain about him....feel free he is a yuge target
Just be honest about it....

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: SaturnFX

You contradict even yourself...
this

He was voted in because he wasn't: McCain Jeb Cruz Rubio Carson etc etc....lets not pretend he was the only choice...he rode high on the republican list because of who he was...a loud character who was gonna stick it to the establishment.

doesnt equal this

No, most ppl voted Don because of Don and his "magnetic" personality (sticky is more like it).

You want to complain about him....feel free he is a yuge target
Just be honest about it....

I didn't contradict myself...I was pointing out to people who say he "wasn't hillary" as the main reason he is president that thats bullcrap. he ran the circuit..people on the right knew who he was and voted specifically for him.

Those two things are the same. magnetic personality...someone claiming he will be the savior that will crush the corruption, etc.

Its early, gonna assume you just misread

a reply to: SaturnFX

You yourself even pointed out he won because "he wasnt"....
He did win the gop nom
He did win that because he was not another bush, or a failed former candidate like mccain, or a bible thumping weirdo like cruz.
He didnt win because he was anything.
Or did you miss the whole gop never trump thing?

There are no expectations with this guy because he was literally a vote no to all others running.
Nothing found on this guy is going to be worse than electing hillary(or mccain or cruz for that matter).

a reply to: gortex

It just keeps getting better, doesn't it?

a reply to: kelbtalfenek

It's been such an eventful first year of this presidency it makes me wonder what's around the next corner , never a dull moment.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

which president in the last 3 decades had character and a legacy of integrity?

Name one in the last 50 years.

People still assume much about the presidents relationship. Unless Melania outright said that Trump violated her trust this is just assumption on every ones part. Thats the problem with tabloid nonsense.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: SaturnFX

You yourself even pointed out he won because "he wasnt"....

offs, that was sarcasm!

He won because people liked him. Are you saying every single other republican runner was a horrible insider swampman?

Pence was running!

no...you can't deflect blame here...Trump was and is your man...you gotta take a bow for the circus that is the executive branch today