It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
a reply to: Soulece
I didn't state it as fact....You asked why anyone would take what a group of (very influential) philosophers might have to say as gospel...I gave you an example reason... not THE reason...but a possible(and probable) one...
A2D
The reason why many people never have the Living God reveal Himself to them, is because their hearts are darkened by sin, the condition of the Fallen nature of humanity.
"But you wouldn't be able to handle My glory. You're living in a corruptible vessel, a body that will die."
originally posted by: EasternShadow
Then why do MOST Christians continue to sin? Some are even worst than those who don't even subscribe to any religion. How many cases have you heard a christian priest sexually abused children, committed scandalous activities behind the curtains and many other sins? Where is Jesus grace? Faith in Jesus does not cleanse your heart from greed, jealousy and selfish motivation.
originally posted by: EasternShadow
Today is not the same as 2000 years ago. So how does Christ's salvation and grace actually works throughout humanity existence? Christian claim Jesus preexistence, then why didn't Jesus come to save Adam from the serpent? Why would god need to wait thousand of years for Christ to be born? Why not save the very first human that god has created?
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
I find this quite ironic when most people like yourself fail to see the "changes" that the Catholic church itself has gone through... The Catholic church has at it's head a COMMUNIST who claims "communists are the best Christians"...
The Catholic church has become very "liberal and even communist at the same time". Were there cases of Catholic priests abusing children before? unfortunately yes, but it has been increasing with the "acceptance of sin as being ok". It has changed with the church. One of those changes has been about the "view on abortion" in which Francis told priests that they all can forgive the sin of abortion when that's not what the bible says, among many other similar changes that pope Francis has decided that should be done because he thinks he knows better. He even wants to change the Lord's prayer.
For decades some people within the Vatican itself have tried to warn of these "changes" that the catholic church has been undergoing" for the past couple of decades at least, when more and more people within the Vatican have become more and more "Liberal". One of those people warning of these changes was Father Malachi Martin. You should read some of his books in which he talks how the teachings of Christ were being subverted, and that there were high ranking officials in the Vatican who were/are satanists. Seeing all the "changes" the Catholic church has been undergoing and it seems that Father Malachi Martin was telling the truth.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
God gave mankind free will, you can decide whether to follow those teachings or not. But again, every action has a reaction. Just like your parents could have warned you not to do certain things, but you went ahead and did them as a child, then you got punished.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: EasternShadow
Let me ask you this. When are children better well behaved? When their parents allow them to do whatever they want without punishment, or when their parents actually decide to teach their children manners, and how to behave? BTW, i am well aware that there are exceptions to the rule, but they are only exceptions.
It is you who might be a bit mixed up. I put no trust in oral tradition, whether it be Torah, or Talmud. If you see something different, then by all means share it. Your opinion of my conclusions is just that.
You are mixed up in understanding Genesis. I suggest you need oral Torah along with written Torah to help you understand.
It is you who might be a bit mixed up. I put no trust in oral tradition, whether it be Torah, or Talmud. If you see something different, then by all means share it. Your opinion of my conclusions is just that. Now if your imply I'm not reading Genesis the way you wish it be read, then you are correct.
You stated
"The Firmament, is the crust of this planet. He does not create "Hell", he created "Heaven". The waters above, and the waters below, is self explanatory."
I learned a long time ago how to separate emotions from logic, and control both. I took no offense. You simply assumed rightfully so that I do not "Follow" the masses. I have a mono tone writing style that deals with only the subject matter.
I did not mean to anger you and if I sounded opinionated then I apologize.
Correct! And from there you must ask the question, why?
The firmament is not the crust of the earth in either secular science nor biblical science.
When science finally is able to penetrate the planet and "observe" the core, it will be self explanatory. Until then, it is all, just opinion! Written, or Oral.
I have given this some thought, and I suspect the answer lies in the mathematical needs of the text, a la Panin. At any rate, God's fire (the Lake of Fire is not Hellfire, just as the LoF is not ID'd as Hell) is for refining and purification, and so was brimstone (sulfur) in those days. However, I will leave room for your interpretation to be correct.
originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: EasternShadow
I bet you don't spank kids either.
Ignorance is truly bliss, lol.
The truth, of the core! If, allowed!
what do you believe they will find at the core of the planet?
The Myth of the Central Sun
In any investigation of the ancient sun god you will inevitably run into a theme of profound influence on ancient thought: You will confront the myth of the central sun — the motionless sun, the sun that did not rise or set, but stood firmly in one place. There is, in fact, a decisive difference between the great luminary celebrated as the king of the world, and the body we call the Sun today: unlike our rising and setting Sun, the archaic sun-god did not move.