It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: imitator
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: imitator
About as possible as aliens being involved. Guess he goes around making reservations in hotels next to mass concerts and MLB games just for kicks then right? That is just a big coincidence?
They could of done trial runs with Paddock, setup meeting etc. to get a feel for him, and then wait for the right time. Also note: lots of hotels are near concerts and sports stadiums, so it's not a far stretch.
originally posted by: RomeByFire
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Still spitballing...
Paddock was selling 'Pre-planned/packaged Terrorism Events'.
Three terrorists show up in the room with a suitcase of $$$...Paddock planned on taking the money and leaving them to it, as he disappears to the Philippines with his GF in the new house she went ahead to buy.
Instead, they kill him...do the deed...and leave with the money.
Edit:
The OTHER (Lalapalooza?) set up...was a 'No Sale' terror event package.
Why shoot the crowd?
The crowd was part of the package he was selling.
So rather than being a freak of nature who murdered innocent folks, he hooked someone else up to murder innocent folks?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: antibren
The simple explanation is that Hodge is lying. As FCD pointed out above, 32134 is setup to be a standalone room. Like he pointed out, no bathroom. Not only that when Hodge gave his interview it was still believed that a security guard had been killed on the 32nd floor. He chose to take this and spice it up and claim he was killed by the police. Turns out the guard was only shot in the leg and went down before the police even arrived.
There are plenty of inconsistencies with Hodge's story. I don't know why anyone why take his word over the official narrative at this point.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: antibren
I was under the impression that the cart was in front of 32135. 32134 has its own door that leads to the hall. That's the door I'm saying was breached. Even then, everything FCD has pointed out in regards to the doors completely destroys the theory any way.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: antibren
So a couple observations based on some pretty extensive knowledge of doors...
1. Double doors without what is known as a "style" in between them cannot be locked in the direction they swing. That, or they need vertical dead-bolts into the frame. That is to say, if the doors swing "in" to 32134, which it looks like they do, then they cannot be secured in this direction. (I mean, there are ways to do it, but these doors do not appear to be set up that way). So, there is no way those doors could only be locked from inside 32134.
2. Double doors like those in the picture make really bad security doors. In fact, to "breach" one from 32135 all you'd really need to do is push hard on it. I think those doors are more what I would call an 'administrative' door (meaning if you didn't rent the whole space the hotel would close them off so you couldn't use 32134 as part of the whole 32135 suite. It's just a billing issue. And, it doesn't look to me like 32134 is really set up to function as a stand-alone room either (no bathroom).
3. Lastly (almost confirming #2 above), the top picture shows what appear to be alarm contacts on top of the two door leaves. This supports the notion they are 'admin' doors only. The alarm contacts would tell the hotel staff whether the doors were open or closed, and the guest would be charged accordingly. Furthermore, they absolutely are NOT "fire doors". No double door without a style can be used as "fire door", it's against IBC (International Building Code).
ETA...In fact, the only true "Fire Door" would be the door into the stairwell, and this would be a "B Labled" 2-hour rated fire door.
Furniture, décor, carpeting...all of it matches precisely the hotel suite. If they faked the photos it would have been spotted. You can't construct all the blood, lighting etc. on various surfaces without leaving digital signatures.
If he was escaping to do more attacks why bring all his toys?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: antibren
You got a copy of that picture? The only one I'm turning up doesn't show the room number.
originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
a reply to: roadgravel
Yes, this is the confusion I have been pointing out to you all. Or the lies, or cover-up, whatever you want to call it.
The suite did have two rooms. There are doors to the entrance of the room with the bed on the very far side of the suite. The rest of the suite is open. You can see the woman walk through the doors to the bedroom at 0:18 here:
www.youtube.com...
They don't mention the other hotel room 32-134. They lump that hotel room together with room 32-135 as if they were included. They are not.
Edit to add layout
originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
a reply to: RomeByFire
a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport
SHADY
www.independent.co.uk...
Mr Hodge had been staying in room 32134 of the hotel.
SHADY
www.smh.com.au...
He said police told him the gunman was in the room 32135, just one room away from his hotel room.
"I'm room 32134 so I'm just so glad I didn't make it back to my room," he said.
SHADY
www.msn.com...
He said police told him the gunman was in the room 32135, just one room away from his hotel room.
"I'm room 32134 so I'm just so glad I didn't make it back to my room," he said.
SHADY
www.dailymail.co.uk...
Paddock, who killed at least 59 people and injured 527 more was tracked down and then found dead in room 32135 - next door to the 36-year-old.
Mr Hodge is thankful that he was not in his room at the time police used controlled explosives to enter room 32134 and locate Paddock.
That last one is really shady because they didn't use controlled explosives to enter room 32134, they used it to enter 32135. 32134 was used to run camera wires through. Was not Mr. Hodge's room.
The official story now is that Stephen rented both rooms. So you were saying?
www.newsweek.com...
Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock rented two rooms facing different directions in the Mandalay Bay hotel, where he fired at a crowd of 22,000 concertgoers Sunday night, killing at least 58 people and injuring more than 500.
He had to have rented 32134 and 32135, and most are hush hush about this, or lying completely.
So the question becomes, why did he rent two rooms when one would suffice? The 32135 suite had a similar vantage point as 32134 on the side.
originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
originally posted by: RomeByFire
Then call conspiracy.
I'll take the word of LEO who were there over you.
What word are you taking over mine exactly?
The LEOs are the ones that took the picture of the food cart. They are also the ones that claimed the wires of the camera go to room 32-134 and through the connecting door to 32-135. The LEOs agree with me.
Watch the video found here of door 32-135 and door 32-134 and food cart with camera and wires: washingtonpost.com
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: KansasGirl
Not exactly. I think that's when he committed to doing the deed he had fantasized for a long time about doing.
I'll bet they find he may have carried guns into other hotels too (maybe not that many, but some) just to get the feel for it. Almost a dry-run of sorts. And I'll bet he started this one off as a dry-run too, but then when he committed then he went full-bore on stocking the room with weapons and ammo. Remember, this dude is a sick and twisted bastage.