It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Still spitballing...
Paddock was selling 'Pre-planned/packaged Terrorism Events'.
Three terrorists show up in the room with a suitcase of $$$...Paddock planned on taking the money and leaving them to it, as he disappears to the Philippines with his GF in the new house she went ahead to buy.
Instead, they kill him...do the deed...and leave with the money.
Edit:
The OTHER (Lalapalooza?) set up...was a 'No Sale' terror event package.
Why shoot the crowd?
The crowd was part of the package he was selling.
They don't have access to their own crowds?? They need someone to find a crowd for them?
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: IAMTAT
Look enough with this unlikely scenario. We have heard it and it feels like you have turned troll.
If you were coming at us with he had brain cancer, wanted to make a political statement.. He is a crazy liberal wanting to make a statement about conservatives etc and maybe get some gun control passed... Well that could be a rational theory.
Gun deal.. Well people have been explaining for pages why it is almost certain we are just wasting bandwidth.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: antibren
From those pictures neither sets of doors look like they were breached. I'm betting the door that was breached was the one in 32134 that led to the hall. It makes sense SWAT would want to go for a pincer move. Why bottleneck all your men at one door with an armed suspect waiting on the other side when you can approach him from two angles?
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: antibren
So a couple observations based on some pretty extensive knowledge of doors...
1. Double doors without what is known as a "style" in between them cannot be locked in the direction they swing. That, or they need vertical dead-bolts into the frame. That is to say, if the doors swing "in" to 32134, which it looks like they do, then they cannot be secured in this direction. (I mean, there are ways to do it, but these doors do not appear to be set up that way). So, there is no way those doors could only be locked from inside 32134.
2. Double doors like those in the picture make really bad security doors. In fact, to "breach" one from 32135 all you'd really need to do is push hard on it. I think those doors are more what I would call an 'administrative' door (meaning if you didn't rent the whole space the hotel would close them off so you couldn't use 32134 as part of the whole 32135 suite. It's just a billing issue. And, it doesn't look to me like 32134 is really set up to function as a stand-alone room either (no bathroom).
3. Lastly (almost confirming #2 above), the top picture shows what appear to be alarm contacts on top of the two door leaves. This supports the notion they are 'admin' doors only. The alarm contacts would tell the hotel staff whether the doors were open or closed, and the guest would be charged accordingly. Furthermore, they absolutely are NOT "fire doors". No double door without a style can be used as "fire door", it's against IBC (International Building Code).
originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Xcathdra
I've assumed a political motive from the beginning. The question is which one?
Trumps reaction makes me think it will be something completely unexpected.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: antibren
I didn't. I'm just saying from the pictures shown neither door was breached. Which would lead me to believe it was another door they were talking about. And considering SWAT would most likely be coming through 32134 there would be no need to breach that door since they could just unlock it if for some reason it was locked.
I just think they're thinking of the wrong door when they heard that SWAT had to breach 32134. Unfortunately for them, that completely destroys their theory.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Still spitballing...
Paddock was selling 'Pre-planned/packaged Terrorism Events'.
Three terrorists show up in the room with a suitcase of $$$...Paddock planned on taking the money and leaving them to it, as he disappears to the Philippines with his GF in the new house she went ahead to buy.
Instead, they kill him...do the deed...and leave with the money.
Edit:
The OTHER (Lalapalooza?) set up...was a 'No Sale' terror event package.
Why shoot the crowd?
The crowd was part of the package he was selling.
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: imitator
About as possible as aliens being involved. Guess he goes around making reservations in hotels next to mass concerts and MLB games just for kicks then right? That is just a big coincidence?