It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: LolliKum
So you are refusing to produce the flat Earth map. Like I said before, you are not an actual believer, just here to troll and argue.
Its impossible to make an accurate map of the globe on a flat surface. The distances won't add up or the shape of the land mass will be different. I have no doubt he knows this and has been trolling people. You coild make the arctic the center for example. Problem is flights out of australia would become longer than the fuel they can store. A flight from day Australia to peru would be days in the air.
originally posted by: LolliKum
a reply to: wmd_2008
This is the sort of silliness that all die hard sphere believers engage in, they imagine because you can explain an observed thing through a sphere, that it is exclusive to a sphere.
. . . Moon appears the other way up in the Southern Hemisphere . . .
This is totally wrong, anything that can be explained through a spherical model of the earth can also be explained on the flat earth model as has been done for thousands of years.
There is no reason whatsoever that you cannot explain the exact same phenomenon as described in your post concerning the Moon using the flat earth.
Because you can explain it on a sphere does not automatically exclude the ability to explain it on the plane.
Anyway, concerning the apparent size of the Sun, I posted two videos on this thread showing the sun getting smaller close to the horizon. I guess I need to post those again for those who missed them.
and
originally posted by: LolliKum
a reply to: wmd_2008
That could be what it is talking about in the page I found about England and Western Australia, with the sun setting in the one and rising in the other.
. . . I think the video is the one by D Marble and it was him in the west of USA (sun overhead) talking to someone in Yorkshire England and Australia . . .
Anyway, there was another video, though, that I was thinking of, probably by Globebusters, where they were talking about New Zealand and England without any mention of anyone in the US. I need to try to find that just by looking at some of them in my history and listen for a minute or two of them talking about it in a 2 or 3 hour long video.
I don't think so. Let me ask you a question. Do you think people are stupid?
. . . hope people don't realize how stupid the idea actually is.
This sounds very pretty and I am sure reading claims like this warms the hearts of desperate Sphere believers, but there is no substance to it.
In order for flat earth to exist gravity cannot exist. And well we know it does or when we drop things it wouldn't hit the floor. We have proven the connection to mass and gravity in the lab. In order for the flat earth to be true every aspect of physics would have to be wrong and we know through experimentation thats just not true physics is describing reality.
There is nothing to show. You tell me, how would the explanation be any different from a spherical model to a flat model?
So you avoid showing any proof that the Moon should reverse on the flat Earth if viewed from North or South of the Equator why am I NOT surprised by that
The video you posted is a fail from the get go.
If you measure the size of the Sun/Moon at the horizon highest point then horizon again they are exactly the same size on a camera sensor.
I was not questioning the ability of those two people in that scenario to both see the Sun at the same time.
New Zealand and England in DAYLIGHT.
Oh?
. . . alot of videos you can watch showing this.
I'm trying to post a video can you help me?