It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sputniksteve
Anyone live near Brasenose College Oxford? I know we have a few UK folks watching. That was Thomas school. I will call them first thing in the morning UK time and see if I can speak to someone in the Library or History department. If anyone is close they could possibly go there with the book description and make better head way thank I can.
I don't know why I never thought of this until right now. You guys are geniuses.
So,yeah. Anyone else got any thoughts on the whole "2 Lukas's" fiasco?
Get out your bricks. Get ready to build (write the book!). Pussy cat, Pussy cat went to London to Seek fame and fortune. The cat went to visit the queen, but instead frightened a little mouse under the chair, ultimately, London will be a significant place, stick to your main aims, it doesn’t matter how hard they seem to get, do not be distracted by that tiny mouse that has a deceiving charm. Faith must not be lost….! You all rely on each others faith.
We don't need no education / We don't need no thought control / No dark sarcasm in the classroom / Teachers leave them kids alone
originally posted by: CromCruachh
Snippet of Serialism theory copied from Wiki;
The theory resolves the issue by proposing a higher dimension of Time, t2, in which our consciousness experiences its travelling along the timeline in t1. The physical brain itself inhabits only t1, requiring a second level of mind to inhabit t2 and it is at this level that the observer experiences consciousness.
But Dunne found that his logic led to a similar difficulty with t2 in that the passage between successive events in t2 was not included in the model. This led to an even higher t3 in which a third-level observer could experience not just the mass of events in t2 but the passage of those experiences in t2, and so on in the infinite regress of time dimensions and observers which gives the theory its name.
originally posted by: Caver78
I read what Mr.Rowe had to say on that blog and he does indeed seem encouraging. When he isn't warning people off of trying to contact 2109. I looked at Chaldean Numerology a little bit, but the fascination with it escapes me.
It's been difficult reconciling his fear of 2109 with his encouragement for people to keep plugging at solving this. Quite a dichotomy. One part of me wants to take it at face value, and the other reminds me that overtime someone gets a genuine response (from whatever weird) that they have this type of response because it's bourne out of inexperience.
I'm not saying Mr.Rowe in his time with SRI was it? Wasn't a great investigator, on the contrary, it's just if you haven't had repeated contact with some of the oddities in our world, from what I've seen this is typical response. It takes many
experiences before you finally get gutsy and start pushing back.
originally posted by: Caver78
It's difficult to determine with him which it is.
Genuine logical fear, or more of an instant recoiling because 2109 dug around in his head for material and shocked him with it, passing it off as "knowing the future/past".
originally posted by: Caver78
Plus you're taking roughly 32 years ago. We aren't as naive as we were and after BEK's, Mothman,UFO's, Grey Aliens, and all the information we've now gotten under our belt whatever 2109 showed him in those envelopes would probably be tame in comparison.
This is where I'm a little stuck. I truly can't tell if this is worthy of the response I'm seeing out of him or not.
originally posted by: Caver78
If he is correct than I fear opening up the 2109 can of worms might not be a great idea, if it just spooked him then I have to ask how would this be different from any other channeled entity? Most of which seem to just be playing around with humans for the attention.
Catch my drift?