US launches Tomahawks on Syrian airbases

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: Ohanka

It's not Assad being fooled... it's the folks who buy the MEDIA's hammering of the NEWS that worries me...


So easily played, the folks in the US..... SAD...

The administration and media are aligned. Scary thought eh?

a reply to: eriktheawful

Well "legal" is still up in the air.

They sure didn't have a problem with 8 years of Clinton lobbying cruise missiles at people.

originally posted by: LightAssassin
a reply to: BlueAjah

Last two chemical attacks, from memory, were proven to be from rebels and not Syrian government....why the F might this be different? In a little over 24hours they have done a thorough investigation and determined it was Syrian govt? I don't think so.

I hate this game they are playing in the middle east.....when the worst country their is Saudi Arabia and they are funding just as much terror in the Middle East as the Syrian government supposedly is.

Think about your first sentence. Syrian rebels have chemical weapons *and* used them on a rebel stronghold??

Breathe...think...research - and try not to let political bias color your analysis. Very, very hard to do. But if you let the facts and the truth speak for themselves, you'll see that it is far simpler and far more complex than the bullsh#t soundbites we get from the MSM.

In a surprise move - I have to go to work and am wheels up in 90 minutes. Please hold the fort down in my absence.

Well if this was false flag it worked brilliantly.

Probably going to be more in the future. More dead babies, more blame on Assad.

Even it would make literally no sense.

a reply to: avgguy

What lib wanted this? I sure as hell didn't. We are generally anti-war.

a reply to: JinMI

That is troubling to say the least...

a reply to: marg6043

I wonder what NK is thinking now about Trump

There be hell toupee from the shock and orange guy!

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit


What does the United States have to Gain for this ? 60 New Tomahawks on Order from the Nearest Defense Contractor , with More Future Orders being Processed Tomorrow ?

Well, the old Tomahawks were getting all dusty sitting around. We had to do something with them.

Some of you guys are out of control with paranoia. Is every newsworthy event a 'false flag'?

This is simple. Assad is a f'n bastard. Syria is a literal hell-hole on earth. The situation is a plague on the world. Millions of refugees, economic peril, extremism running rampant, innocents being killed...etc. At the moment,it doesn't matter whose fault it is. My only complaint is that Trump didn't go ahead and level every military installation.

And to the people calling the US a bully, or work police, get real. We aren't the bully here, the bully is gassing people to incite fear and control. We are standing up for those unable to stand for themselves.

This isn't about oil, this is about the endless chaos that is effecting not only the Syrians but many nations. It's costing a lot of money and lives. It needs to stop.

a reply to: neo96

Sure it is. Like I said: look it up.

For several decades now, the legality of a POTUS doing things like this is still being questioned.

So far, for several past presidents, they get away with it, so it keeps happening.

I can't believe that I just watched CNN go from one commercial break to another without someone showing how much they hate Trump. I don't believe that has happened for over a year. There is actually someone CNN hates more than Trump: Assad.

I guess CNN had to interrupt their regularly scheduled programming to bring you this special announcement from their sponsors, "Killing Syrians it most good."

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

So how will Assad and Russia React to this Attack ? Just Complain without Escalating it , or Deny that it was Assad's Air Force that Gassed that Village ? The other Option is for Russia to Challenge the U.S. Navy in the Gulf with a Show of Force to Counteract Future U.S. Actions .

At this moment I have no freakin idea with how crazy the world has become. However, I don't think Russia will counteract. I think this will get a political PR facelift where Putin won't lose face.

originally posted by: Ohanka

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: autopat51
a reply to: TinfoilTP

never said that..just dont believe it was syria

The only other Nation that has fixed wing aircraft that could fly from that airbase is Russia so if you don't believe it was Assad your only other choice is to believe Russia did it.

Sorry if i sound like a smartass but who said that only russians can pilot russian aircrafts. It's possible that a syrian pilot used a russian aircraft for the attack.

And who controls the airbase, who mixed the agents for delivery pre flight? Are you going with the lone pilot theory? If so there are too many grassy knolls for it to work.

Nobody mixed anything because the weapon was not deployed from the air.

The chemicals were at the terrorist depot attacked by the Syrians.

Lol, that tired old story won't work with Trump, the Tomahawk response has already landed.

a reply to: Ohanka

Sarin gas used. According to Turkey

No glove used by the white hats.

Proper ventilation not used either.

Semantics to some.

a reply to: face23785

And yet it's still false that every single time we launch a missile it means we're going to topple the government. Stop spreading fake news. Thanks.

I never said that a single missile launch equals regime change. You are like a parrot with 'fake news' and 'stop this fake news.....thanks'.....as if you are the only one who knows the news of the future. You're fairly new here, so I have a suggestion for you: Reading comprehension, and fully taking in what somebody is saying, word for word, is VITAL on this site, otherwise you just keep on being snarky and losing your credibility with every post.

I will be sending you a special piece of humble pie when Assad is removed.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: eriktheawful

Well "legal" is still up in the air.

They sure didn't have a problem with 8 years of Clinton lobbying cruise missiles at people.

Or endless drone strikes.
Authorized under the war on terror.
Which is what this strike falls under.

Because Al qaeda had no "base".

Sigh......

Or Gaddafi and Hillary's private war.

50 missiles into Syria?

You know what this was?

A warning to North Korea!!

a reply to: neo96

I can not wait for tomorrow news and reactions from the international community.

I don't know what to say, I mean Trump doesn't take crap I knew that but darn I wasn't expecting this to happen this soon.

What, the S-400 system didn't stop them, or is Russia hesitant to give up it's signature?

a reply to: interupt42


Their are 500 Oz of silver in every Tomahawk missile, after it goes off the silver is lost for ever.goldbasics.blogspot.co.nz... Just a bit of interest for silver bugs.