US launches Tomahawks on Syrian airbases

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: autopat51
a reply to: TinfoilTP

never said that..just dont believe it was syria

The only other Nation that has fixed wing aircraft that could fly from that airbase is Russia so if you don't believe it was Assad your only other choice is to believe Russia did it.

Sorry if i sound like a smartass but who said that only russians can pilot russian aircrafts. It's possible that a syrian pilot used a russian aircraft for the attack.

And who controls the airbase, who mixed the agents for delivery pre flight? Are you going with the lone pilot theory? If so there are too many grassy knolls for it to work.

a reply to: eriktheawful

Ah, thanks. Sorry I missed it the first time you posted it. The thread is moving too quick.

Well, I guess at least it was legal that we probably bombed the right enemy's airbase even if it won't actually accomplish anything positive as a result.

Russia Today says that Syria's State News claims no personnel were lost in the attack.

I hope that's true, but at a time like this I wouldn't consider Syrian State News to be particularly reliable.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: autopat51
a reply to: TinfoilTP

never said that..just dont believe it was syria

The only other Nation that has fixed wing aircraft that could fly from that airbase is Russia so if you don't believe it was Assad your only other choice is to believe Russia did it.

Sorry if i sound like a smartass but who said that only russians can pilot russian aircrafts. It's possible that a syrian pilot used a russian aircraft for the attack.

And who controls the airbase, who mixed the agents for delivery pre flight? Are you going with the lone pilot theory? If so there are too many grassy knolls for it to work.

Nobody mixed anything because the weapon was not deployed from the air.

The chemicals were at the terrorist depot attacked by the Syrians.

What?????????? I was just getting ready for bed when I happen to scroll the news and this was there, 50 missiles!!!!!!!!!
Oh, my god, Trump is a war president.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: eriktheawful

Well, I guess at least it was legal that we probably bombed the right enemy's airbase even if it won't actually accomplish anything positive as a result.

You think Assad will use chemical weapons again after this? Seems like a positive result to me.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

Shayrat base was used by Russia and Syria. There are Mi-28N attack helicopters there. Or were.

originally posted by: JinMI


When you have proof, please share!

Way more questions than answers at this point unfortunately.

You'll get proof at the same time I will.

I just think we should make sure we are attacking the correct people before we launch a whole bunch of missiles at them.

But I'm old fashioned like that....

originally posted by: Ohanka
Russia Today says that Syria's State News claims no personnel were lost in the attack.

I hope that's true, but at a time like this I wouldn't consider Syrian State News to be particularly reliable.

I doubt Syria would bleed in public. Just a thought.

MSM is in alignment with the whole "dead babies" angle.

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: eriktheawful

Well, I guess at least it was legal that we probably bombed the right enemy's airbase even if it won't actually accomplish anything positive as a result.

You think Assad will use chemical weapons again after this? Seems like a positive result to me.

Well he didn't before.

I guess he sure as hell won't now.

Although the rebels will probably do another one and blame it on him again now they know how easy Trump is to fool.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: eriktheawful

Ah, thanks. Sorry I missed it the first time you posted it. The thread is moving too quick.

Well, I guess at least it was legal that we probably bombed the right enemy's airbase even if it won't actually accomplish anything positive as a result.

Well "legal" is still up in the air. Take a look at it. There are examples where congress said it wasn't "legal" on past prezs, but pretty much nothing was done about it. Remember what Obama did in Libya....pretty much NO ONE was happy about that...but nothing was done about it.

originally posted by: mOjOm

originally posted by: JinMI


When you have proof, please share!

Way more questions than answers at this point unfortunately.

You'll get proof at the same time I will.

I just think we should make sure we are attacking the correct people before we launch a whole bunch of missiles at them.

But I'm old fashioned like that....

Precisely why this whole things stinks like DB's lazyboy!

The motive and suspect that we are being fed don't make sense.

The action and the reaction don't make sense.

Oh, my, Oh, my.

The Russias were warned about the attack, I wonder what NK is thinking now about Trump

Tomorrow is going to be interesting, yes very interesting.

a reply to: TruMcCarthy

You think anyone who uses chemical weapons against their own people, including children really give a sh*t about the same kinds of things you and I do???

My guess is anyone who does that isn't going to start being nice and normal because we blew up his airport.

Can we all agree that when somebody posts "never go full retard" they are, in fact, going full retard?

a reply to: Ohanka

It's not Assad being fooled... it's the folks who buy the MEDIA's hammering of the NEWS that worries me...


So easily played, the folks in the US..... SAD...

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Ohanka

How do Russia, Iran and China stand to gain from this?

Russia makes billions personally enriching Putin from arms sales, but they get to keep their naval base.

Saudi Arabia is waging a proxy war against Iran. Both want piplines. Iran/Russia besties.

China. Anyone thats ever read the Art of War. To win a battle one doesn't need to engaged directly.

Get two sides to kill each other.

And China needs oil/natural gas more so than anyone. OVer 1 billion people to feed and cloth.

What does the United States have to Gain for this ? 60 New Tomahawks on Order from the Nearest Defense Contractor , with More Future Orders being Processed Tomorrow ?

originally posted by: Ohanka

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: eriktheawful

Well, I guess at least it was legal that we probably bombed the right enemy's airbase even if it won't actually accomplish anything positive as a result.

You think Assad will use chemical weapons again after this? Seems like a positive result to me.

Well he didn't before.

I guess he sure as hell won't now.

Although the rebels will probably do another one and blame it on him again now they know how easy he is to fool.

Oh, you're one of those people. Well, I guess the US is behind everything evil and all the evil players in the world are actually victims. You probably think Kim Jong Un is a fine leader like Assad.

The US is getting very positive reactions from the rest of the world, at minimum this is a positive for US-Global relations.

1 Tomahawk for every civilian killed by Sarin. Your move, Assad boy.

a reply to: Black_Fox

Hate to break it to you but germans aren't that innocent either. There are large bunkers hidden all over the place and nobody knows what's in them except a few people. For the record Merkel is extremely slow when it comes to reacting to certain events. It took her hours to respond to the terrorist attack in Berlin for example. There is also the fact that it's currently 05:34 am here.