US launches Tomahawks on Syrian airbases

Good move by Trump, attacking the airbase from which the attack originated. It sends a strong message to Assad not to use chemical weapons anymore. Also it is a signal that the US is ready to be the moral leader of the world once more.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: EternalShadow

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: EternalShadow
Amazing yet not surprising how many of us Americans are buying into this BS.

We are TRULY stupid as F#, and voraciously blood thirsty..

Get the popcorn out? This is getting interesting!!!!???

Insane.

You just made us all pop another bag.

Wow.

So you care for an airbase that stores the components of a banned chemical weapon?
Amazing.

Show me verfied Intel that that's the case. You're whole cavalier attitude towards this is alarming! Like its Monday night football or the world series or some sh#!!

The ramifications of this are obviously above your mental and spiritual pay grade.

a reply to: JinMI

I would be curious what they know of the situation as well.

They love their MIC teat and were looking to feed mommy along with establishment .

The MSM, GOP, DNC candidates have been pushing for world conflict and destruction and it APPEARS that trump may just have given them a win. Whether intentionally or not , we will have to wait and see.

Proxy war done gone "full-retard".

You never go "full-retard".

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Are we done with 'Trump Loves Russians' narrative yet?

It'll be great to see how The Young Turks spin this one, won't it?

a reply to: JinMI

We don't know for #2 is not the answer I'd hoped for.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: autopat51
a reply to: TinfoilTP

never said that..just dont believe it was syria

The only other Nation that has fixed wing aircraft that could fly from that airbase is Russia so if you don't believe it was Assad your only other choice is to believe Russia did it.

Sorry if i sound like a smartass but who said that only russians can pilot russian aircrafts. It's possible that a syrian pilot used a russian aircraft for the attack.

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

I think the chemical attack was a CIA op

Or the FSB(Russia),GIP(Saudi).VEVAK(Iran) or MSS(China)

Lots of people stand to gain.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: mOjOm



All of this said: We have zero reason to interdict ourselves in Syria.

What about the murdering of citizens with chemical weapons?

By who?

Do you trust the CIA to know this? If so, why?

The Gulf of Tonkin was a precipitating factor for military interdiction.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

I think the chemical attack was a CIA op

Or the FSB(Russia),GIP(Saudi).VEVAK(Iran) or MSS(China)

Lots of people stand to gain.

How do Russia, Iran and China stand to gain from this?

a reply to: BlueAjah

Last two chemical attacks, from memory, were proven to be from rebels and not Syrian government....why the F might this be different? In a little over 24hours they have done a thorough investigation and determined it was Syrian govt? I don't think so.

I hate this game they are playing in the middle east.....when the worst country their is Saudi Arabia and they are funding just as much terror in the Middle East as the Syrian government supposedly is.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Are we done with 'Trump Loves Russians' narrative yet?

No he's still a Russian puppet

That is all i'm hearing coming from the MSM.
It's actually disgusting.

They make out as if this were a game.

And why don't Italy, Britain, Japan, Germany, India, etc, care about children?

I mean they must not, cause why didn't they get in on this?

Or do it themselves, cause ya know, the children.....

Or maybe they think this is all BS, and the U.S is just on it's continuous march to empire.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: JinMI

We don't know for #2 is not the answer I'd hoped for.

When you have proof, please share!

Way more questions than answers at this point unfortunately.

So i guess every now and then we spend 60 million and just kick some arab counrty in the balls then walk away. Sounds like business as usual.

From a strategic point its good. From a political point...not so good.

Targeting military assets is a tried and true method but the area of effect is dangerously close to Russian forces and thankfully the Russians got the message to GTFO.

the problem is the timing. Methinks this was planned as the Chinese head honcho was in town at the time so trump could get chance to flex his muscles, but as the old martial arts saying goes 'the deer doesn't graze where the tiger prowls.'

In laymans terms that means don't put yourself in a situation you can't get out of.

a reply to: mOjOm

The Odds are " High " that some Russian Advisers were Stationed at that Airbase considering the Syrian Air Force is Comprised mostly of Russian Built Aircraft .

a reply to: neo96

McCain's Crew....

Must be about time to despatch middle east peace envoy Damien Thorn ooops I mean Jared Kushner

a reply to: Ohanka

How do Russia, Iran and China stand to gain from this?

Russia makes billions personally enriching Putin from arms sales, but they get to keep their naval base.

Saudi Arabia is waging a proxy war against Iran. Both want piplines. Iran/Russia besties.

China. Anyone thats ever read the Art of War. To win a battle one doesn't need to engaged directly.

Get two sides to kill each other.

And China needs oil/natural gas more so than anyone. OVer 1 billion people to feed and cloth.