The 8 min clip where the FBI lays out the PUBLIC evidence against Trump..

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Huh I hadn't heard that one, I guess it's possible.

It's been in the TMZ style news in the past.

It only caught my attention when one of the stories purported that Shepard wanted to bring his boyfriend to the FOX Christmas party (where the two of them being seen together would have alluded to a homosexual partnership) but Roger Ailes said no.

Of course, if this were true it would be evidence that shows Ailes discriminated based on Shepard's sexual orientation. That's obviously a big no-no in my book.

But the question comes to mind, why would a self-righteous and closeted homosexual continue working for a network who's (then) CEO wouldn't even allow him (a veteran anchor) to reveal that he is gay to the public.

I would link you a source but I don't save or bookmark tabloid-esque content like that. I only recall them poorly for the sake of philosophical discussion. :p

Shep did come out as gay.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: JinMI

Ye, Comey also said the majority of what is reported by the MSM is Bull.

This wasn't in the media.. it was a congressional hearing with the FBI.

I'm confused. Why did you provide a video of Shep reporting on it then, and not a direct video of the hearing itself?

Ahhh, to claim a moral victory by showing a Fox News anchor turning on Trump.

Somehow Smith knows more then the FBI, CIA and NSA.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Huh I hadn't heard that one, I guess it's possible.

It's been in the TMZ style news in the past.

It only caught my attention when one of the stories purported that Shepard wanted to bring his boyfriend to the FOX Christmas party (where the two of them being seen together would have alluded to a homosexual partnership) but Roger Ailes said no.

Of course, if this were true it would be evidence that shows Ailes discriminated based on Shepard's sexual orientation. That's obviously a big no-no in my book.

But the question comes to mind, why would a self-righteous and closeted homosexual continue working for a network who's (then) CEO wouldn't even allow him (a veteran anchor) to reveal that he is gay to the public.

I would link you a source but I don't save or bookmark tabloid-esque content like that. I only recall them poorly for the sake of philosophical discussion. :p

Oh, I'm not saying I doubt you or anything, I just honestly hadn't heard about it. And you raise a good point, Why would he stay?

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: JinMI

Ye, Comey also said the majority of what is reported by the MSM is Bull.

This wasn't in the media.. it was a congressional hearing with the FBI.

I'm confused. Why did you provide a video of Shep reporting on it then, and not a direct video of the hearing itself?

Ahhh, to claim a moral victory by showing a Fox News anchor turning on Trump.

Somehow Smith knows more then the FBI, CIA and NSA.

It was me and it was the video I ran across..

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Tucker pup is a pleasure.

Carlson, I can turn off.

Good for you. I'm glad you can keep track of the remote. Or does Tucker pup find it for you?

a reply to: Wardaddy454

Only if it's next to a tennis ball.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Shep did come out as gay.

Yes but when?

Actually, this is all unimportant and quite frankly I do not care if he is gay.

I merely suggested that he might be the kind of person that allows his sexual identity to dictate his politics and personality. Now he doesn't appear that way on camera, he's obviously of the conservative leaning within the spectrum of flamboyance. But he definitely has a vendetta against Trump and Ailes, and Ailes undoubtedly elevated then candidate Trump with his direction over the network.

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: JinMI

Ye, Comey also said the majority of what is reported by the MSM is Bull.

This wasn't in the media.. it was a congressional hearing with the FBI.

I'm confused. Why did you provide a video of Shep reporting on it then, and not a direct video of the hearing itself?

Ahhh, to claim a moral victory by showing a Fox News anchor turning on Trump.

Somehow Smith knows more then the FBI, CIA and NSA.

The video of the congressional meeting where they lay out all the public evidence is about 4 min in I think.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Ah, you ran across it. gotcha, so the first thing that "looks" about "right" and is anti-trump. You're just rehashing the same stuff being thrown around, take a look around bud.

What about Flynn's call? somehow ignore that, huh? smh

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Shep did come out as gay.

Yes but when?

Actually, this is all unimportant and quite frankly I do not care if he is gay.

I merely suggested that he might be the kind of person that allows his sexual identity to dictate his politics and personality. Now he doesn't appear that way on camera, he's obviously of the conservative leaning within the spectrum of flamboyance. But he definitely has a vendetta against Trump and Ailes, and Ailes undoubtedly elevated then candidate Trump with his direction over the network.

This year..

I don't remember exactly but it was widely reported.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: JinMI

Ye, Comey also said the majority of what is reported by the MSM is Bull.

This wasn't in the media.. it was a congressional hearing with the FBI.

I'm confused. Why did you provide a video of Shep reporting on it then, and not a direct video of the hearing itself?

Ahhh, to claim a moral victory by showing a Fox News anchor turning on Trump.

Somehow Smith knows more then the FBI, CIA and NSA.

It was me and it was the video I ran across..

Really? because I typed it up in youtube and got more than a couple dozen hits. And besides, aren't you quick to dismiss Fox as "Fake News"? But all of a sudden it's a good source for you...

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Yes, I saw the hearing, all of it. Nothing CONCRETE or EVIDENT was apparent. You're grasping straws.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

This year..

I don't remember exactly but it was widely reported.

....And after Ailes was ousted by Murdoch and Megan Kelly decided to leave for NBC.

Timing is everything, don't you think?

So the dossier that describes all of the collusion is to be taken as the real deal now? I honestly have not been keeping up.

Just from a common sense perspective, you would have to believe that back in July of 2016 that Trump would be POTUS. I for one at that time did not think such a thing possible. Not until around mid September did I think he had an honest shot. I was still doubtful on election day.

The Trump Dossier Is Fake and Here's Why

Schiffs whole statement depends upon the dossier being factual.

a reply to: ColdWisdom

There's even more on Shep out there. Shady and nasty piece of work. Perfect for amoral MSM hit jobs.

All you haters (not you Cold!) should be ashamed of yourselves; most of y'all know Trump isn't a colluder. Guy will bring us some jobs if we give him a chance too.

I would agree the jury is still out on Manafort.

a reply to: The GUT

I thought Manafort had connected ties to the Ukraine and not to Russia?

This is just the beginning. Trump is triggered now and his administration can't trust him.

The leaks will become a flood and tie Trump to Russian espionage. And it's adios orange one.

Just the beginning and the rats will implicate Trump to save themselves and their political careers.

It's ugly in DC and the WH will be in chaos. Trump should have drained the swamp like he promised; instead he filled it with snakes. Stupid move, believe me, very very stupid.

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Ah, you ran across it. gotcha, so the first thing that "looks" about "right" and is anti-trump. You're just rehashing the same stuff being thrown around, take a look around bud.

What about Flynn's call? somehow ignore that, huh? smh

If it is video of an FBI congressional hearing..

The call being leaked??

What do I care if a couple guys commiting treason against the US has their shady quid pro quo meeting published???

So some cia agent who knew trump had made a deal with the Russians, decided to stop them from lying??


That is the bigger story to you than a president making a deal with a competeting foreign power to leak government files on his political opponent..in the middle of his own presidential run?!?!

Really?!?!

a reply to: JoshuaCox

It's a Constitutional thing. Doesn't have anything to do with opinions.

If you want context... watch the entire hearing with Comey and Rogers...


www.c-span.org.../fbi-director-says-hes-investigating-links-trump-campaign-russia



Not many questions answered, but a lot of grandstanding by both sides of the aisle in regards to questions...

I watched it... and didn't get my info from MSM....

The best part IMO, was when Comey said it wasn't illegal for govt officials to LIE to reporters......