It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Yxboom
Having the police is a necessary evil. If there were no law breakers, then there would be no need for police officers.
.
Originally posted by Yxboom
Well then, exactly when is it okay to use lethal force???
.
Posted by instar
If someone breaks into my home and threatens me with a weapon, the law (here) says, im justified in using "nessesary force to defend myself"
The problem is that "nessesary force" is unquantified and thus the onus is on the person to prove they feared for their life etc.
Posted by instar
The same should apply to police.
Posted by instar
It seems that being a police officer, in itself, somehow better qualifies a person to judge that? based on the conviction rate, or lack of, for police here who shoot civilians fataly. how is that so?
Posted by instar
A whole other issue is that of using lethal force to protect propertie in the case of security gaurds etc. In this case I think its never justified.
quote: Posted by instar
If someone breaks into my home and threatens me with a weapon, the law (here) says, im justified in using "nessesary force to defend myself"
The problem is that "nessesary force" is unquantified and thus the onus is on the person to prove they feared for their life etc.
If the suspect who broke into your house is dead, then how is he going to testify against you???
quote: Posted by instar
A whole other issue is that of using lethal force to protect propertie in the case of security gaurds etc. In this case I think its never justified.
Armed guards are not allowed to shoot people for theft. That is a misnomer.
Originally posted by Yxboom
Well then, exactly when is it okay to use lethal force???
.
Originally posted by BasementAddix
You obviously new here...im an Officer...
Originally posted by me again
Anyways, can I hear an amen for the police???
.
....some schmuck in a rush at 5 am decides
Originally posted by instar
....some schmuck in a rush at 5 am decides
How come you cops/ buddies stories always start with "some schmuck"?
So much for respect for public. Maybe the poor guy was riding close because he was driving in a blizzard and couldnt see? Maybe he was just tryin to make it home to his family safely?
Originally posted by instar
So was it a light snow or a blizzard, make up your bloody mind!
Most people will discern a difference.
Originally posted by instar
So hes a schmuck? not maybe an inexperienced driver? not maybe a very tired driver? not maybe a driver who's lost the confidence to drive in hazardous conditions? Why judge so harshly? you give no details about the driver or what happened or what he said , other than labelling him/her a schmuck.
sounds like a one sided story.
Originally posted by Chakotay
No Shots. I want you to understand that when I pin on a badge and strap on a gun with the full authority of the State behind me, my role is not to be your friend.