It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Freija
We shouldn't care or make fun of how people express themselves because we're all just people regardless of how we look or act. It seems pretty innocent to me?
Why does it have to go beyond that? Please explain that to me?
The things you've said do make common sense and I agree with you. Unfortunately, common sense these days is sorely lacking in some and for those that don't share these progressive attitudes, where are children going to learn this tolerance and acceptance when it doesn't come from home? The "grapevine"? Yeah, that's an accurate source.
This I totally agree with.
originally posted by: onequestion
Hell I don't even understand it...
Let's be real.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: onequestion
Hell I don't even understand it...
Let's be real.
What's funny is half the SJW's in this thread said the exact same thing no more than 6 months ago, but they're a bunch of experts now.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: xuenchen
Maybe there should be 2 schools - one that teaches existing subjects like 2 + 2 = 4, concieve is spelled conceive and Tashkent is the capital of Uzbekistan. The other school can teach all the new subjects like gender identity, how to protest the loudest, what constitutes a safe space, why everyones opinion is not equal and how to disguise intolerance as tolerance.
Then we can let the parents decide which school to send their children to.
After all, applying subtle changes to the existing US government sanctioned educayshun curriculum by special interest groups has consequences - for all effected parties. Anyone denying or surprised by that is deluded.
originally posted by: onequestion
Why does it have to go beyond that? Please explain that to me?
Really want answers to this one.
originally posted by: Bone75
After giving this a bit of thought, I say go for it. In fact, I think it should be required that the class only be taught by a transgender person.
This little social experiment won't get far, trust me.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Freija
So basically, we open the can of worms because you are pretty sure there will be problems.
So it goes like this.
Johnny is a normal kid but one fall he comes back horribly disfigured and the other kids make fun of him. It causes him all kinds of upset despite his teachers' and parents' best efforts to tell all the other little boys and girls that Johnny can't help how he looks because he was caught in a fire and received third degree burns that disfigured him and now looks like this:
So do you think that just to prevent more Johnnys, we should have special curriculum set aside to teach little boys and girls about third degree burns and how they can scar a person and make them look different?
You know ... because we wouldn't want someone to get hurt because of the ignorance of others.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Gryphon66
I'm disgusted that was even brought up.
originally posted by: Freija
originally posted by: WeAre0ne
Freija is an admitted transsexual. Obviously HE supports this.
Ooo! Misgendering. Is that all you got? I'm so crushed.
originally posted by: Abysha
Are there pronouns for tremendously large gaping asshats? I just want to know how to properly refer to you.