It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When school began on Aug. 13, Perry told school administrators that she wanted to use the girls’ bathroom and locker room, instead of the unisex bathroom she had used as a junior.
The school consented, in accordance with guidelines from the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights that say students should be allowed to use facilities in accordance with their gender identification.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
These militant of that group won't be happy until everyone else praises them and convinces them your praise is genuine...over and over and over.
Equality has nothing to do with it. These are (the fringe) sick people who require acceptance to survive. And no one is required to accept anyone.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Give it a couple more generations.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: MysticPearl
No. The transgender teen had just as much right to use the girl's bathroom as the other girl students. If the transgender teen had wanted to go somewhere private, that was her right, just as it is the other girls' rights to go somewhere private if they requested it.
Equal rights. That's non-discrimination.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: MysticPearl
No. The transgender teen had just as much right to use the girl's bathroom as the other girl students. If the transgender teen had wanted to go somewhere private, that was her right, just as it is the other girls' rights to go somewhere private if they requested it.
Equal rights. That's non-discrimination.
That's not equal at all.
Suggesting girls go somewhere private if they don't want a guy with a penis changing with them isn't equal by any stretch of the imagination.