It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: ladyvalkyrie
Sorry, you don't get to make the rules. In my State, I can refuse to take a breathalyser test upon a traffic stop under suspicion of DWI, but..........we're a No Refusal state, so they can arrest me and take a blood sample.
Same difference. Comply or else!
Yeah, but that goes back to probable cause. If they have reason (behavior, smell, paraphernalia, etc.) to lead the officer to believe you're intoxicated, then it's for the sake of public safety that they NOT let you back on the road before making sure you're good to go.
And if the doctor's consent form had been worded like "Our office will drug test you if we have reason to believe you are using illegal drugs." Then I would have signed it. I don't do drugs, so they would have no reason to suspect that. But random tests at any time? And immediate reporting to the authorities? No counseling. What if it's a false positive?
Now, would you be so willing if they were going door to door to check your blood? Probably not. Random checks for everyone without cause?
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
If a police officer pulled me over and asked to search my vehicle I would tell them 'no'. The easiest way to get around a warrant requirement is to simply ask for consent. I know I'm innocent and I don't consent. That should be the end of it. They shouldn't be able to withhold treatment because I refuse to 'voluntarily' consent to a warrantless search of my person.
And as for my grandmother and the gun question: you can kill yourself with a knife, or OD, or drive your car off a cliff. Did they ask her about any of those? The more prudent way to deal with someone that you're prescribing mind altering substances to would be to closely monitor them for changes. I'm just wondering if the 'do you own a gun' question is being turned over to LE?
That's my whole entire point. They're not making this policy for my health and safety, or the health and safety of my fetus. There are perfectly constitutional ways to go about that. Doctors are acting as agents of law enforcement and circumventing warrant requirements....and THAT is BS.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
I guess the only thing scarier than a doctor refusing care because you won't consent to a drug test, is the people here that are supporting the doctor!
It's her body, her rights. It's not the doctors body! And if she (the OP) refused to sign consent to get drug tested and something happened as a result, then the doctor would not be held liable because she (the OP) signed the damned form!
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
originally posted by: GetHyped
originally posted by: DBCowboy
It's her body, her rights.
Hence her right not to use that doctor. No one's rights are being infringed here.
Yeah, but what happens when I start going to different doctors and they ALL have some BS policy like this? Then I don't get prenatal care? Wow, that policy sure is successful!
And as I pointed out in a PP, I'm totally clean. I'm just someone with strong principles about personal freedoms. Policies like this drive actual addicts away from prenatal care for fear of prosecution. Totally counter productive.
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
a reply to: DrakeINFERNO
So Jane Doe refuses to sign it. He continues to provide prenatal care. In reality Jane Doe is chock full of drugs. She's just really good at hiding it. The baby is born jacked up. It's on record that she refused random drug tests. All liability would be on her at that point, how could ANYONE come back on the doctor?
PS for all, I'm in Texas.
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Pap smears look for abnormal or precancerous cells. Prescribing birth control actually has nothing to do with that. Anything they need to know, they can find in blood work, and usually they don't even check that.
That's kind of my point. They tell you you HAVE to do something, when really you don't.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
If you do test positive for any illicit substances it is required by the DEA that they receive that information.
Orwell meets medicine.
That database just gets bigger and bigger and one day when they need it they pull the info they want to back you up in a corner.
It has nothing to do with your safety, health or the doctor's liability.
Just more governmental intrusion.
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
a reply to: LSU0408
That's the problem. Too many people just do it. I just talked to one mom at the school. She went to this same doctor. She didn't agree with that form either, but just went ahead and signed it. That's why the TSA is doing body cavity checks on innocent people....for our 'safety'. Everyone's scared of terrorists so they just go along with it. Our rights are being eroded daily and everyone just shrugs and goes "Just sign the form."
I could pass any drug test at any given time. I would personally prefer to find a doctor that doesn't have a policy that I feel infringes on my rights. And what if this is some new deal and they ALL have this policy? So my choice would either be to sign away my civil rights OR not receive prenatal care? That's a crock.
originally posted by: theySeeme
Have you ever heard of a case where someone was arrested after answering a doctor's question about gun ownership? Please, just show me one single case. That's ridiculous.
originally posted by: LSU0408
Well hey, I understand your frustration, but if you sign that paper to let them test your system for drugs, you won't leave that clinic feeling any different. It's up to you though, I'd sign it and be done, and I'm definitely not one that will just lay over and give in to something. I wish you the best and I hope none of my posts come across assholish to you. My fiance is 7 wks 6 days today so it seems like you two may have conceived around the same time if I read your posts correctly.