It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: windword
Segregation based off Gender is wrong. That is all I will say on this subject.
NUS Women are meeting in Solihull for their annual get together. The message read: “Some delegates are requesting that we move to jazz hands rather than clapping, as it’s triggering anxiety. Please be mindful!” The original request is said to have come from Oxford University, and despite being widely ridiculed on Twitter, the NUS was standing by the plan.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: InTheLight
I don't agree with "Boys Only" clubs either. I will restate. Segregation based on gender is wrong, regardless of which gender is doing the segregating. You can't discriminate based on race, or religious beliefs. Why is it suddenly okay to discriminate based off gender?
Fear-potentiated startle (FPS) is a reflexive physiological reaction to a presented stimulus, and is an indicator of the fear reaction in an organism. The FPS response can be elicited in the face of any threatening stimulus (e.g., any object, person or situation that would cause someone to experience feelings of fear), but it can also be elicited by a neutral stimulus as a result of fear conditioning, a process that occurs when a benign stimulus comes to evoke fear and anxiety upon being paired with a traumatic or fear-provoking event. The stimulus in question is usually of auditory (e.g., loud noise) or visual (e.g., bright light) nature, and startle response measures include eyeblink rates and pulse/heart rate.[1] The negative impact of heightened FPS in the face of neutral stimuli can be treated pharmacologically, using psychotropic medications that are typically used to reduce anxiety in humans. [2] Recent literature, moreover, has implicated increased FPS responses as a correlate in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and other anxiety disorders
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Krazysh0t
So basically the title and article (and maybe the OP) are biased? They pick up some story and add to it to attack feminists? The title should be changed to reflect reality accurately.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Deaf Alien
You got it. That's basically what InTheLight and I have been saying since we joined the thread.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: InTheLight
If just seeing a man or having a man in your vicinity is enough to send you into a panic attack, you probably should be in therapy, not at some NUS event. I'm real friggin' tried of the whole "Womenfolk are fragile flowers and need safe spaces away from all the evil, rapey men." Because as a woman, I find this notion horribly insulting. If you're so damaged that you can even be around the opposite gender, that impetus is on YOU to find help or remove yourself from the situation, not demand cordoned off safe spaces any time you want to go out in public.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: InTheLight
It sets a bad precedent. Replace the word "men" with "blacks" in this situation and suddenly they're horrible racists. But when it's gender, suddenly it's okay. I just don't get it.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Deaf Alien
It wasn't announced like a broadcast. It was a request posted at Oxford University which was then ridiculed on Twitter (which is where I'm sure the author of the article picked the story up from).
NUS Women are meeting in Solihull for their annual get together. The message read: “Some delegates are requesting that we move to jazz hands rather than clapping, as it’s triggering anxiety. Please be mindful!” The original request is said to have come from Oxford University, and despite being widely ridiculed on Twitter, the NUS was standing by the plan.
www.breitbart.com...
@nuswomcam please can we ask people to stop clapping but do feminist jazz hands? it's triggering some peoples' anxiety. thank you!
originally posted by: STTesc
As someone who has dealt with severe anxiety, this is complete BS! When your pulse jumps to 200+ and you feel like you're having a heart attack, that's anxiety. And let me just say that people clapping has never triggered such an attack. These people are looney, out of their minds.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: InTheLight
It sets a bad precedent. Replace the word "men" with "blacks" in this situation and suddenly they're horrible racists. But when it's gender, suddenly it's okay. I just don't get it.
So you'd be alright with with white people with anxiety issues attending a white group meeting about white's issues, and saying "no blacks allowed" to make them feel welcome and safe?
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: InTheLight
It sets a bad precedent. Replace the word "men" with "blacks" in this situation and suddenly they're horrible racists. But when it's gender, suddenly it's okay. I just don't get it.
It sets a good precedent for women with anxiety issues trying to attend women's group meetings about women's issues, and being made to feel welcome and safe.
originally posted by: daftpink
originally posted by: STTesc
As someone who has dealt with severe anxiety, this is complete BS! When your pulse jumps to 200+ and you feel like you're having a heart attack, that's anxiety. And let me just say that people clapping has never triggered such an attack. These people are looney, out of their minds.
But obviously you are aware that everyone with anxiety issues can react differently to different things depending on the roots of the anxiety. As someone who has worked with various people who have anxiety for many different reasons, your comment sounds looney.
Not to mention the fact you know nothing about the people who made the request. What if they have autism? Still looney to suggest clapping can cause anxiety for people with autism?