It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
history is that the Nazi leaders and the SS were evil.
Hitler and his henchmen victimized an entire continent and exterminated millions in his quest for a co-called "Master Race."
But the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race didn't originate with Hitler. The idea was created in the United States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power. California eugenicists played an important, although little known, role in the American eugenics movement's campaign for ethnic cleansing.
Eugenics was the racist pseudoscience determined to wipe away all human beings deemed "unfit," preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in "colonies," and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries.
California was considered an epicenter of the American eugenics movement. During the Twentieth Century's first decades, California's eugenicists included potent but little known race scientists, such as Army venereal disease specialist Dr. Paul Popenoe, citrus magnate and Polytechnic benefactor Paul Gosney, Sacramento banker Charles M. Goethe, as well as members of the California State Board of Charities and Corrections and the University of California Board of Regents.
Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Stamford, Yale, Harvard, and Princeton. These academicians espoused race theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data to serve eugenics' racist aims.
Stanford president David Starr Jordan originated the notion of "race and blood" in his 1902 racial epistle "Blood of a Nation," in which the university scholar declared that human qualities and conditions such as talent and poverty were passed through the blood.
In 1904, the Carnegie Institution established a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island that stockpiled millions of index cards on ordinary Americans, as researchers carefully plotted the removal of families, bloodlines and whole peoples. From Cold Spring Harbor, eugenics advocates agitated in the legislatures of America, as well as the nation's social service agencies and associations.
The Harriman railroad fortune paid local charities, such as the New York Bureau of Industries and Immigration, to seek out Jewish, Italian and other immigrants in New York and other crowded cities and subject them to deportation, trumped up confinement or forced sterilization.
Does anyone even think to read Hitler's manifesto "Mien Kampf"?
Sometimes it's the symbolic details which speak volumes.
Emil Georg von Stauss, the president of Germany's largest bank, the Deutsche Bank, lent Hitler a portable Remington so he could write his infamous anti-Jewish banker manifesto "Mein Kampf."
Von Stauss, a principal Nazi Party fund raiser, also was a longtime business associate of the Rothschilds.
Hitler dictated "Mein Kampf" to typists Rudolf Hess and Emil Maurice during his cushy eight-months stay at Landsberg Prison in April- December 1924. (His five-year sentence was commuted. He had a two-room suite with a view and was allowed to receive gifts and visitors.)
Von Stauss was part of a "Hitler support group" consisting of wealthy Illuminati. Helene Bechstein, the wife of the piano manufacturer pretended to be Hitler's adopted mother and smuggled out sections of the manuscript. She took care of all Hitler's expenses and hoped he would marry her daughter Lotte. Franz Thyssen, the chairman of United Steelworks sent Hitler a birthday gift of 100,000 gold marks.
This account was taken from Rudolf Hess' letters by Belgian author Stan Lauryssens, ("The Man Who Invented the Third Reich" 1999, pp.130-135.)
It contradicts the image we have of Hitler in 1924 leading a grass roots fringe party. In fact, he was a front man for the international bankers he pretended to oppose. But if we read the "The Protocols of Zion" carefully, we shouldn't be surprised.
Henry Ford Sr. was a long-time supporter of Frank Buchman. He was also a long-time supporter of Adolf Hitler. Ford had quite a history of involvement with ultra-conservative and fascist causes himself.
During World War I, Ford wrote a series of viciously anti-Semitic articles for The Dearborn Independent, which he then published in book form as a hate-filled diatribe against Jews called "The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem", which basically blamed Jews for all of the problems of the world. The International Jew is still reprinted and used and much admired by neo-Nazis and White Supremacists even today.
In the early 1920s, this book was published in Germany under the title The Eternal Jew. It reportedly had a major influence on Adolf Hitler, and he almost certainly plagiarized parts of it in Mein Kampf. The admiration was mutual. Following Hitler's assumption of power, Ford sent Hitler 50,000 Deutsch Marks every year on Hitler's birthday. Ford's anti-Semitic views were well known during the period that the Buchmanites bragged of Ford's support of their movement. For more information on Ford's Nazi connections, see Who Financed Hitler?, by James and Suzanne Pool. New York: Dial Press, 1978.
Alcoholics Anonymous, Cult or Cure?, by Charles Bufe, page 30, footnote 16.
What happened was, at the end of 1918, Henry Ford Sr. bought the small independent country newspaper The Dearborn Independent and, at great expense, turned it into a nation-wide newspaper that was devoted to spreading his message.
Suddenly on May 22, 1920, the Independent lashed forth with a violent attack on the Jews. The boldface headline on the front page was a blunt and concise summation of the editorial's thesis: "The International Jew: The World's Problem." The first paragraph began: "There is a race, a part of humanity which has never yet been received as a welcome part." This people, the article continued, has ever been fouling the earth and plotting to dominate it. In order to eventually rule the Gentiles, the Jews have long been conspiring to form an "international super-capitalist government." This racial problem, the Independent said, was the "prime" question confronting all society.
The following ninety-one articles covered a wide field of topics related to the international Jew. ...
In subsequent articles, Ford frequently accused the Jews of causing a decline in American culture, values, products, entertainment, and even worse, of being the instigators of World War I.
That's an absurd claim, Jesus died 2,000 years ago and you are for Him are you not?
The term doesn't really mean literally antisemitic. It was coined to mean specifically "anti-Jew" but without actually using the word, Jew, so it can't really be applied to Jews being prejudiced against Arabs, despite their arguably being Semites.
yet we need extra specific laws clearly defined as "anti-semitic" The not so funny part is that the Jews are now committing anti-semitism, against the Palestinians and other Arabs . . .
i know you're intent on proving your point and that's all fine and dandy but what was the original point you were trying to make before this debate about anti semitism arose?
As it turned out, it became ironic, since apparently they did not foresee this kind of thing when they came up with the term.
And yet you dont see the irony in Israels genocide against the Palestinians?
What is ignored by the official narrative is that those who wanted to leave Germany were allowed to, and they were able to take their money with them, and those who chose to stay and be part of German society were left unmolested and continued on in business throughout the war.
Does the Holocaust Industry lie about the numbers of Holocaust victims?
FINKELSTEIN: The figure for these Holocaust survivors at war's end is generally put at some 100,000. The number of living survivors cannot be more than a quarter of this figure now. ... The Israeli prime minister's office recently put the number of 'living Holocaust survivors' at nearly a million. The main motive behind this inflationary revision is again not hard to find. It is difficult to press massive new claims for reparations if only a handful of Holocaust survivors are still alive.
Is the most prominent Holocaust celebrity, the greatest survivor in Holocaust history, Elie Wiesel, in fact a Holocaust liar?
FINKELSTEIN: Preposterous statements pass without comment. Elie Wiesel reminisces in his acclaimed memoir that, recently liberated from Buchenwald and only 18 years old, "I read the Critique of Pure Reason don't laugh! in Yiddish." Leaving aside Wiesel's acknowledgment that at the time "I was wholly ignorant of Yiddish grammar", The Critique of Pure Reason was never translated into Yiddish. "The truth I present is unvarnished", Wiesel sighs, "I cannot do otherwise."
Are the promoters of the Holocaust Industry deliberately spreading lies?
FINKELSTEIN: Israel Gutman, director of Yad Vashem and a Holocaust lecturer at Hebrew University, said: "It's not that important' whether Binjamin Wilkomirski's [now discredited 'autobiographical' account of childhood in the camps], Fragments, is a fraud. 'Wilkomirski has written a story which he has experienced deeply; that's for sure ... He is not a fake. He is someone who lives this story very deeply in his soul." So it doesn't matter whether he spent the war in a concentration camp or a Swiss chalet; Wilkomirski is a Holocaust survivor because "his pain is authentic
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: NOTurTypical
That's an absurd claim, Jesus died 2,000 years ago and you are for Him are you not?
Thats sloppy thinking. "Are you with us or against us" Sound a lot like how the US suckered Australia into the "coalition of the willing" in the face of condemnation by the general populace
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: NOTurTypical
Are you a Nazi sympathizer?
No he simply studies, something you obviously lack..with that rude comment. Try reading the transcipts of the Nuremburg trials, it may open your eyes.
Right, and my point was that there was and is, reasons for creating a false narrative, and it is to cover up the truth for a few very serious reasons.
but to study one without the precedent and antecedent narrative is to do truth an injustice.
I'm quite sure there is some pro-Nazi literature floating about. Moot point.