Black Triangle UFOs and an Alleged Breakaway Civilization- Discuss

originally posted by: Jukiodone

At least one of the "Doritos" sightings was a documented authorised military tip off but dropping 2 seperate projects in a general conspiracy forum and providing a narrative with photographic evidence does surely qualify as unprecedented- authorised or not.

Which were the "Doritos" sightings? Over Texas? I wonder if Bassplyr's craft was also one of these.

So here we go... back to the meat of the matter... obvious "insider" knowledge of where/when classified craft could be seen along with a more than merely plausible explanation of how they operate.

Yes, far above other internet "disclosures" of it's ilk... thus the reason a few of us are running in tight circles over this incident.

I'm still leaning in the "Huh, wow... maybe it IS true" camp... with amending it to "partly true" when around sane people.

I am still running thought trains about how it fits with the narrative IF true... and it fits pretty well, excepting those pesky older UFO sightings.

But his pre-RK stuff is, so far, solid as it gets in UFOland.

EDIT: and a thought occurred to me... IF it's a tall tale, why did he spoil it with the hard-to-swallow RK- no aliens stuff? He could have said we got it from Roswell and been done with it and he would have had more adoring fans swallowing it completely... my own wrestling is over what I thought I knew about "aliens" after all, and I cannot be alone...

a reply to: mbkennel

They were covered in Zaphod's witchita sightings thread- loads of info and insight in there.

This sums up general points pretty well in one page if you are lazy.

2 different types of aircraft (probably)
2 separate sightings
1 one of the sightings as a result of a "tip off"
Article bizarrely suggests the flurry of black triangle activity in 2014 was timed to co-incide with a law suit relating to the "cancelled" A12...

Bassplyrs sighting was low level silent so cant see anything to suggest those craft would have that capability given the pics....
Astr0 was NOT connected to the "Dorito" sightings ( as far as I know!)

a reply to: mbkennel

Texas will be known next year.

Wichita....longer, if ever.

a reply to: Zaphod58

I keep forgetting is Kansas or texas the big white colored one that everybody thought was a B2? Cause that one is in my opinion a huge development strategically. I could see that never coming to light any time soon.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

That was Kansas. Texas was obviously not a B-2.

a reply to: Baddogma

There is a well confirmed pattern historically
where nearly ALL people who get too close
to genuine high strangeness self-destruct..
going from sem-credible to complete loony
tunes. There must be a thousand documented
cases in Vallees files alone.

Now I'm not saying that is what happened
to the original original poster. ..I don't
know and even if I did it would be against
the T & C to say that.

I don't see any mystery here at all, of
any kind whatsoever. Just more
rinse repeat that has been going on
for centuries/millenia. IMHO
of course.

Kev

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Agreed... it could very well be... and trust me, I know all about the destruction of those poor souls who get a glimpse out of Plato's Cave.

And this could very well be one of those instances where someone shows up with an outlandish claim, makes some minor miracles, and then scurries back to dimension X or whatever strange rock they dwell under... the lore IS full of them... the guy in Chicago with the water as fuel source in the 70's comes to mind, and the long line of alchemical jesters who turned lumps of lead into gold and melted away into fantasy land.

I just don't know, Kev... and perhaps that IS the point?

a reply to: Zaphod58

Yeah it's been a while since I looked at those threads. Thanks.

That thing will be a major advantage. Bout time too.

a reply to: Baddogma

We all get caught up in fantasy worlds
talk a lot of nonsense and use up all our
passion on this 'stuff' and let the world
burn.

If archons/black hats actually run the
world then their efficiency with controlling
us via this stuff approaches 100%.

Now actual research has value...but it's
far too easy to be had.

IMHO researching ANY conspiracy stuff
seems contraindicated unless partial
freedom from the 'control loop' is gained
first --- and that is a feat all on it's own.

Now for the record. ...I have no issue with
black project stuff flying around....im sure
it does....I myself walked through the
prototoye for the real world 'red October
submarine' years ago.

But this new use of real experimental
aircraft to induce people to be captured
by woo energies --- pure genius.

Kev

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Now that's interesting. The prototype for the Red October. I thought they just tried adding MHD to the propulsor area like a sheath that surrounded it of a few Ohios. That's a story worth sharing if you can. PM is cool too if not on the public boards. That's pretty sweet if you got to tour the inside of a SSBN.

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Now that's interesting. The prototype for the Red October. I thought they just tried adding MHD to the propulsor area like a sheath that surrounded it of a few Ohios. That's a story worth sharing if you can. PM is cool too if not on the public boards. That's pretty sweet if you got to tour the inside of a SSBN.

I can't really talk about it. It's not a huge secret by any means..
heck, it might be in Janes Fighting Ships by now. But at the
TIME, it got me a high clearance.

All I will say, is that the prototype for that type propulsion
system sat right next to the one I was trained on, that
wasn't as whoopedy doo.

I was a nuclear engineroom supervisor for 7 years.. I was
on two nuclear cruisers and one nuclear aircraft carrier,
however, not on a boomer or fast attack sub.

Kev

originally posted by: Jukiodone
a reply to: mbkennel

They were covered in Zaphod's witchita sightings thread- loads of info and insight in there.

This sums up general points pretty well in one page if you are lazy.

2 different types of aircraft (probably)
2 separate sightings
1 one of the sightings as a result of a "tip off"
Article bizarrely suggests the flurry of black triangle activity in 2014 was timed to co-incide with a law suit relating to the "cancelled" A12...

Bassplyrs sighting was low level silent so cant see anything to suggest those craft would have that capability given the pics....
Astr0 was NOT connected to the "Dorito" sightings ( as far as I know!)

I do remember a comment from Astr0. One of the pictures of high-altitude aircraft (I think Kansas) showed a significant lighting on the leading edge. I wrote that I wonder if it is not merely a result of sunlight. Astr0 said something which implied it was quite important. My default explanation was leading-edge plasma but that was not confirmed (and i'm not sure, as the glow was pretty bright, and white; for plasma one expects fairly dim and blue-purple).

i.kinja-img.com...

This is the one I wonder if it's the same as Bassplyr's. LA triangle. Bass, does that look like yours? The semi-internal white-lighting, though not at each corner, is the connecting factor. Maybe a variant?

I'm interested particularly in the physics.

a reply to: mbkennel

I was hoping he would of elboarated on that. When i started seeing them in the daylight it was just the edges. A golden, v-shaped, ribbon.

a reply to: mbkennel

It could be due to an ablative skin. A hypersonic vehicle, or close to hypesonic vehicle would compress the air in front of it, causing the heat to rise. The lighting across the leading edge and nose of the vehicle could be a result of the ablation. That's just a guess, though.

Biefield-Brown effect?

a reply to: mbkennel

Hate to do this to you, but nope. Don't look alike. Wrong color. Mine was a matte grey and I believe much smaller. I think I know what that one is you are referring to. I believe it's relatively large and has a different although very important roll.

In regards to that light in the front. Didn't he who shall not be named say something in a different thread in regards to something else where he said "And now with light!" Might be a good avenue to explore.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Hey, would you say the one you saw resembled the pic he posted from the base?

a reply to: Arpad

Nope doesn't look like that either. That could be something using similar tech. Mine didn't have the center light. The outer lights were pale blue. Triangle was not black but matte grey. Same size thou. More sleek from what I can tell.

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: mbkennel

Hate to do this to you, but nope. Don't look alike. Wrong color. Mine was a matte grey and I believe much smaller.

I wouldn't quite be so hung up on the color---actually it seems the color might be a matte grey if on the ground but the intensity/brightness different. In the picture, it's clearly at a high altitude in daylight, and as a result there would be substantially more air between the camera and the craft, and thus more blue light scattering in front of the craft, changing it's apparent color/blending it with "blue sky". The pic looks like a 'merge' between blue sky + grey which would be accurate in this scenario.

Of course matte grey is hardly distinguishing air craft, for the very reason above most military aircraft are by default colored matte grey (at typical cruise altitudes it blends in best).

What about shape?

a reply to: mbkennel

im positive the two are not the same craft. I am pretty sure the craft in that photo is much bigger and has a different roll. A cool roll but not the same at all. I think Lockheed even put a CGI psudo version of it in their commercials.

But that leading edge and its light. Surely light can do more than help blend things in. remember the quote "and now with light!!!" that he who shall not be named made.

On a separate note. if that was the craft I saw then why'd the camera man see it? Get it? Here's one to mess with you. Maybe it's not the aircrafts fault one wouldn't be able to see it. it's all in the mind of the beholder.