Beijing-bound MAS plane carrying 239 people missing as of 20 mins ago.

reply to post by Seek_Truth


Maybe, looks like the wreckage is fitting the description, it could have been blown to bits in the sky and some debris recovered, if there is any cover up it will be easy to do.

Seek_Truth
This has really turned into a MASSIVE cover-up of EPIC proportions.

We will never see any wreckage. My prediction is they call off the search within the next couple days.

I'm finding it more and more likely that they will find bits and pieces of plane floating, but they will never find it intact, we will never find the black boxes and never know exactly what happened.

This is not evidence for a cover-up however

Massive cover up?

Maybe it did fly into the middle of the ocean and crashed which makes finding it very difficult. It's not like there are searching a couple of city blocks.

roadgravel
Massive cover up?

Maybe it did fly into the middle of the ocean and crashed which makes finding it very difficult. It's not like there are searching a couple of city blocks.

Have we all forgotten every bit of evidence that suggests a cover-up by the Malaysian Govt (and TPTB) throughout the course of this thread??

So according to the mapping we're given the flight was heading for the South Pole!!!


This is all too much!!!

How did it take nearly 3 weeks for "Data" to say that "Evidence" "Shows" that the "Flight Ended In The Ocean"?????

Where was this "Data" yesterday?
Or the day before?
Or on the second day of the search, given the Plane only had enough fuel for an 8Hour flight??

This is all lies... I can't tell you how... I know via "Data" using never before used technology!!!


Peace!

The transcript again, the ''more details'' press conference tomorrow should be interesting.

ETA The ''new tech'' is probably secret surveillance tech that has been around for a while but they are cagey as to releasing any details about it. We all know that spy tech is advanced enough to track individuals via phones etc and certainly 777's. Nefarious activity from military or whoever was flying it, chances are there is more to the investigation than is being released, which is something that has been obvious from the start.

Often when things are covered up, it because WHO was involved, WHO might be implicated and how it might affect other organisations etc.

twitter.com...

reply to post by Seek_Truth


Maybe that is to save face and money. What runs the world, people with power and money. How much confidence do you have in the skills of the Malaysians with all this.

roadgravel
reply to post by Seek_Truth

 

Maybe that is to save face and money. What runs the world, people with power and money. How much confidence do you have in the skills of the Malaysians with all this.

Absolutely NO confidence. However I have confidence in the other countries involved. Suprising to me that Australia, US, and UK started searching in the "Right" area WAY prior to this "new analysis" being released.

How did it take nearly 3 weeks for "Data" to say that "Evidence" "Shows" that the "Flight Ended In The Ocean"?????

Did you consider that analysts figured out a way to use the data in calculations to yield better numbers than what has always been needed for business. Might that take a more than a couple of days.

"We share this information out of respect for openness!!!"

😂😂😂😂😂

Now I know they're full of it!!!


They think they're clever...
They don't know if the debris is the Plane, so even if it isn't they can stop the S&R & say they cannot find anything and we'll just have to take their word for it!!!


Peace MH370, I know you were shot down, Goddess bless you all, especially the children. xxx

The search has ended...

Now the investigation begins

It is now known that MH370 crashed on the indian ocean.

Release from Malaysia Airlines . . .

Malaysia Airlines deeply regrets that we have to assume that MH370 ended in the southern Indian Ocean. As you will hear in the next hour from Malaysia’s Prime Minister, new analysis of satellite data suggests the plane went down in the Southern Indian Ocean.

Rest is Here


New analysis of satellite data suggests . . . . sounds more like . . .Conveniently enough, our completely self-serving, arse-covering interpretation that hopefully gets a which of you to ignore anything else in this matter.

Questions . . .

Is this the same satellite data they've been using for days now, and trotted out to the media every time they spotted a belly-up floating dolphin, claiming it to be wreckage of this flight?

Is this the same data they've used to tell us the plane when north and/or south, after heading west, or not?

Is this the same data they've used to tell us the plane when up to an altitude of 45,000 feet, then down to 1,000 feet, but then used to tell us that the original claims weren't valid and they really couldn't tell what height it was at?

Is this the same data that was used to determine the plane landed in Pakistan, only to be rescinded a couple days later claiming an error in the data?

And now they're claiming their 'interpretation of the data' . . . well . . . I'll just stop right there with my own interpretation of this latest announcement . . .

Horse huey.

Interactive of the search.

www.theguardian.com...

reply to post by roadgravel


My point is the Plane could not have been in the air longer than 10hrs, and that's being generous...
So they had this "Data" on the first day... but didn't know how to analyse it...
Now, in some sort of miracle, they've now deciphered what happened but they've never done this before, it just so happens that first time around, these brand new calculations are "evidence"!!!

The short version... I'm suspicious!


Peace Road!

voided

GoalPoster
With no disrespect to the families of those who were on board this flight, I find the latest announcement to be complete, unmitigated horse turds of the runniest kind.

"Using technology never used before . . ." without a shred of objective evidence, the only direction this flight could have gone was south????

What the hell?? I'm either daft, or clearly missing something here but some computer program and technology 'never used before' determined this based on . . . um . . . ummmmmmmmmmm . . . what the hell is that based on???

The engine pings have never been used to track location before. Scientists have been analysing the data very hard to make these conclusions, first the northern and southern corridors, now they have ruled out the northern. We don't know how because we're not physicists/space engineers.

They must have had other 'pings' not just the last ping, which informed the North/South arc.

If they had more than one ping I have read they could plot some kind of flight path. If say the 2nd to last ping was in a similar position to the last one - it would have been because the plane stopped.

I'm guessing these other pings informed the Southern search area near Australia and they are pretty sure the wreckage is from the plane (possibly got data from ubderwater radar etc.) They didn't release the data from the other pings because if they found nothing they would be accused of covering up again.

CharlieSpeirs
So according to the mapping we're given the flight was heading for the South Pole!!!


This is all too much!!!

How did it take nearly 3 weeks for "Data" to say that "Evidence" "Shows" that the "Flight Ended In The Ocean"?????

Where was this "Data" yesterday?
Or the day before?
Or on the second day of the search, given the Plane only had enough fuel for an 8Hour flight??

This is all lies... I can't tell you how... I know via "Data" using never before used technology!!!


Peace!

Well said. Im on your side Charlie. Peace back at ya!

CharlieSpeirs
reply to post by roadgravel

 

My point is the Plane could not have been in the air longer than 10hrs, and that's being generous...
So they had this "Data" on the first day... but didn't know how to analyse it...
Now, in some sort of miracle, they've now deciphered what happened but they've never done this before, it just so happens that first time around, these brand new calculations are "evidence"!!!

The short version... I'm suspicious!


Peace Road!

I don't believe it's some sort of miracle. The satellite data released to the public was about the last ping only!

Inmarsat will have had other pings from which they could plot a better flight path. Being a private company they are not going to broadcast this and leave their methods and industrial info. open to public scrutiny BEFORE wreckage was located.

They have probably never done this before because there Satellites are not designed to trace aircraft.

And look who just Joined the Board at INMARSAT....

www.inmarsat.com.....

20 March 2014: Inmarsat has announced that General C. Robert Kehler, United States Air Force (Retired), has been appointed as a non-executive board member.

General Kehler retired in January this year following a 38-year air force career, and will be taking up his new post with Inmarsat on 6 May, when he will also become a member of the remuneration committee.

“I’m delighted that General Kehler has agreed to join Inmarsat’s board,” said Andrew Sukawaty, Inmarsat’s Executive Chairman.

Robert Kehler Wiki

CharlieSpeirs
reply to post by roadgravel

 

So they had this "Data" on the first day... but didn't know how to analyse it...
Now, in some sort of miracle, they've now deciphered what happened but they've never done this before, it just so happens that first time around, these brand new calculations are "evidence"!!!

The short version... I'm suspicious!

I have to assume you have not studied or worked much with math, science or every worked in data analysis.

edit:

Seems to point to the reason the US shifted search south days ago.

roadgravel
Did you consider that analysts figured out a way to use the data in calculations to yield better numbers than what has always been needed for business. Might that take a more than a couple of days.

Good comment.

The data they deal with isn't like a set of GPS coordinates of the plane's location versus time. They had to make inferences about location from non-location data, and there is usually more than one way to process data, and as you said, it can take time to do when they may be processing it in new ways.

With all the stories and comments by analysts, there are lots of differences, but one thing in common is that most if not all seem to feel we aren't being told the full story. I wouldn't be surprised if there's more to this than we are being told also.