It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which is due to switch on in 2025, could help find the planet.
"Within a year of that telescope operating, I think we'll find it," Brown said.
originally posted by: chr0naut
If planet X exists, the watchers that would have come from it are frozen solid on their home planet and vapour on Earth.
originally posted by: Station27
originally posted by: chr0naut
If planet X exists, the watchers that would have come from it are frozen solid on their home planet and vapour on Earth.
But what if they're not on their home planet, and are instead inside of it because it's a planet-sized spaceship? It happened that way on Star Trek - "For The World Is Hollow And I Have Touched The Sky."
originally posted by: chr0naut
The planet would have formed outside of the habitable zone around its star. It would never have been warm enough, for long enough, for life to have evolved.
originally posted by: 5thHead
Scientist say they will find planet X in the next few years. They call it planet 9 these days since they demoted Pluto to a "dwarf" planet, but it's been the planet of crossing since before the symbol of the cross was used for Jesus (his real symbol is the fish as we are in the age of pieces)
The ancient sumerians called it the twelfth planet as it would be the 12th if you count the sun and the earths moon as the sumerians did.
www.livescience.com...
They seem to have narrowed the search quite a bit and claim they will find it in the next few years.
the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which is due to switch on in 2025, could help find the planet.
"Within a year of that telescope operating, I think we'll find it," Brown said.
Seems like not too long ago a lot of nay Sayers said it was all fake and bs. Some may show up in this very thread. But science says its there.
And the sumerians knew more than most give them credit for. ...are they right about what the planet of crossing really is? Nibiru? The home of the watchers.
originally posted by: chr0naut
The planet would have formed outside of the habitable zone around its star.
originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
But everyone already knows where planet X is. It is between planet W and planet Y. I think Daffy Duck said that.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
The Truth About Nibiru
Been a while since I've had the opportunity to link to this thread.
The theorized object bears no similarity to what Sitchin claimed about Nibiru. This hypothetical object sits way out in the Kuiper Belt, has an orbit that takes between 5000 and 10,000 years, and doesn't enter into the inner solar system.
If an object of this mass were entering into the inner solar system on a regular occurrence, it would throw all the planets out of orbit. Instead all of the known planets have stable orbits.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
The need for Planet X disappeared in 1992 when it was determined we had the mass wrong for Neptune. When the bre mass was plugged in the discrepancies in orbit disappeared.
originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
But everyone already knows where planet X is. It is between planet W and planet Y. I think Daffy Duck said that.
originally posted by: Station27
But what if they're not on their home planet, and are instead inside of it because it's a planet-sized spaceship? It happened that way on Star Trek - "For The World Is Hollow And I Have Touched The Sky."
originally posted by: Station27
originally posted by: chr0naut
The planet would have formed outside of the habitable zone around its star. It would never have been warm enough, for long enough, for life to have evolved.
What on Earth are you talking about? If it was a planet-sized spaceship, it wouldn't have "formed" anywhere. It would have been "built." And I hardly think it's creators would have forgotten to install a climate control system. Do you?