It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The quest for planet X continues

page: 1
12
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 28 2024 @ 11:01 PM
link   
Scientist say they will find planet X in the next few years. They call it planet 9 these days since they demoted Pluto to a "dwarf" planet, but it's been the planet of crossing since before the symbol of the cross was used for Jesus (his real symbol is the fish as we are in the age of pieces)


The ancient sumerians called it the twelfth planet as it would be the 12th if you count the sun and the earths moon as the sumerians did.



www.livescience.com...


They seem to have narrowed the search quite a bit and claim they will find it in the next few years.



the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which is due to switch on in 2025, could help find the planet.

"Within a year of that telescope operating, I think we'll find it," Brown said.



Seems like not too long ago a lot of nay Sayers said it was all fake and bs. Some may show up in this very thread. But science says its there.


And the sumerians knew more than most give them credit for. ...are they right about what the planet of crossing really is? Nibiru? The home of the watchers.
edit on 5291123America/Chicagopm28 by 5thHead because: Add quote



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 02:45 AM
link   
a reply to: 5thHead

If planet X exists, the watchers that would have come from it are frozen solid on their home planet and vapour on Earth.

edit on 2024-02-29T02:51:24-06:0002Thu, 29 Feb 2024 02:51:24 -060002am00000029 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 03:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
If planet X exists, the watchers that would have come from it are frozen solid on their home planet and vapour on Earth.


But what if they're not on their home planet, and are instead inside of it because it's a planet-sized spaceship? It happened that way on Star Trek - "For The World Is Hollow And I Have Touched The Sky."



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 04:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Station27

originally posted by: chr0naut
If planet X exists, the watchers that would have come from it are frozen solid on their home planet and vapour on Earth.


But what if they're not on their home planet, and are instead inside of it because it's a planet-sized spaceship? It happened that way on Star Trek - "For The World Is Hollow And I Have Touched The Sky."


The planet would have formed outside of the habitable zone around its star. It would never have been warm enough, for long enough, for life to have evolved.

It is so cold that a lot of molecular chemistry could not have happened because the atoms don't 'jiggle around' enough to intermix like they do here. They were, and still are, close to the temperatures of the interstellar medium (-173 to -263 ⁰C) - that's as little as 10 ⁰C off absolute zero, which is as cold as you can get.

edit on 2024-02-29T04:07:02-06:0004Thu, 29 Feb 2024 04:07:02 -060002am00000029 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 04:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
The planet would have formed outside of the habitable zone around its star. It would never have been warm enough, for long enough, for life to have evolved.


What on Earth are you talking about? If it was a planet-sized spaceship, it wouldn't have "formed" anywhere. It would have been "built." And I hardly think it's creators would have forgotten to install a climate control system. Do you?



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 05:11 AM
link   
But everyone already knows where planet X is. It is between planet W and planet Y. I think Daffy Duck said that.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 05:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: 5thHead
Scientist say they will find planet X in the next few years. They call it planet 9 these days since they demoted Pluto to a "dwarf" planet, but it's been the planet of crossing since before the symbol of the cross was used for Jesus (his real symbol is the fish as we are in the age of pieces)


The ancient sumerians called it the twelfth planet as it would be the 12th if you count the sun and the earths moon as the sumerians did.



www.livescience.com...


They seem to have narrowed the search quite a bit and claim they will find it in the next few years.



the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which is due to switch on in 2025, could help find the planet.

"Within a year of that telescope operating, I think we'll find it," Brown said.



Seems like not too long ago a lot of nay Sayers said it was all fake and bs. Some may show up in this very thread. But science says its there.


And the sumerians knew more than most give them credit for. ...are they right about what the planet of crossing really is? Nibiru? The home of the watchers.


I have created a thread about it a few weeks ago

www.abovetopsecret.com...

But the existence of not of this planet is not related to conspiracy theories and (false) prophecies



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 05:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut




The planet would have formed outside of the habitable zone around its star.


The habitable zone isn't much more than a rough guideline to help us GUESS what a planet orbiting another star is like. It is less a real thing and more of a way for hungry people to get a government grant.

In our solar system Jupiter lies outside the so called habitable zone, yet it's moon Io has the second hottest regions in the system. The sun is the only place hotter.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 05:53 AM
link   
The Truth About Nibiru

Been a while since I've had the opportunity to link to this thread.

The theorized object bears no similarity to what Sitchin claimed about Nibiru. This hypothetical object sits way out in the Kuiper Belt, has an orbit that takes between 5000 and 10,000 years, and doesn't enter into the inner solar system.

If an object of this mass were entering into the inner solar system on a regular occurrence, it would throw all the planets out of orbit. Instead all of the known planets have stable orbits.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 05:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
But everyone already knows where planet X is. It is between planet W and planet Y. I think Daffy Duck said that.



Yes, that's interesting. The article in the OP falsely claims planet x was proposed in 2016. Yet, daffy duck was talking about it long before.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 06:10 AM
link   
a reply to: 5thHead

Planet X was actually proposed in 1894 by Percival Lowell to explain discrepancies he perceived in the orbits of Neptune and Uranus. The need for Planet X disappeared in 1992 when it was determined we had the mass wrong for Neptune. When the bre mass was plugged in the discrepancies in orbit disappeared.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 06:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Threadbarer
The Truth About Nibiru

Been a while since I've had the opportunity to link to this thread.

The theorized object bears no similarity to what Sitchin claimed about Nibiru. This hypothetical object sits way out in the Kuiper Belt, has an orbit that takes between 5000 and 10,000 years, and doesn't enter into the inner solar system.

If an object of this mass were entering into the inner solar system on a regular occurrence, it would throw all the planets out of orbit. Instead all of the known planets have stable orbits.


Nibiru and Co are just nonsensical conspiracy theories that have nothing to do with real science but unfortunately are propagated online at a much faster rate than ever before.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 06:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Threadbarer

They. Don't have stable orbits. That's how they know it's there. They see the janky orbits and know something really big must be out there pulling on them.

Also, when the planet crosses it is said to cause great problems. Like the great flood for example. Noah was told to build a boat to avoid impending doom. The flood seems to coincide with the end of the ice age. Those are some pretty big effects.

Also, you say "regular basis" as if it means often, which is not the case. 5,000 to 10,000 years may be close to accurate.

It is also becoming main stream science that the asteroid belt was once a planet. Just like the sumerians said so long ago. A planet turned in to a bunch of rocks doesn't seem to stable to me. It looks more likely something "crossed" it's path and really destabilized the thing.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 06:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Threadbarer

The need for Planet X disappeared in 1992 when it was determined we had the mass wrong for Neptune. When the bre mass was plugged in the discrepancies in orbit disappeared.


Tell that to the scientists who are currently looking for it.

It's good to see you acknowledge that "science " is often wrong and needs to be constantly questioned and reevaluated, though.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 06:41 AM
link   
a reply to: 5thHead

The orbits of the planets are stable. Scientists proposed this current planet because of the highly elliptical orbits of a certain class of comets.

The other theory is that they are caused by a rogue star passing by or solar system a long time ago.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 06:47 AM
link   
a reply to: 5thHead

You mean the scientists that have calculated that the closest this object would ever come to the inner solar system is 200 AU?

Just for comparison, Pluto is 39 AU from the sun.



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 07:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
But everyone already knows where planet X is. It is between planet W and planet Y. I think Daffy Duck said that.



It was Porky Pig who pointed out the labeled planets through the port when Daffy's calculations went a little too complicated.

But yes Sir, you are indeed correct.




posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 07:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Station27

But what if they're not on their home planet, and are instead inside of it because it's a planet-sized spaceship? It happened that way on Star Trek - "For The World Is Hollow And I Have Touched The Sky."



Yes. You wouldn't build a giant space ship you would carve it. You would subtract from existing rock rather than add..

I think Elon is of the same opinion which is why he started the boring company. Why spend all the time effort and resources required to build and deliver habitation modules to Mars when you can just carve your habitat out of rock?





Many ancient civilizations talk about the underworld. Maybe there is something to the underworld mythos. Maybe the watchers have a lot of experience with these techniques.
edit on 5290707America/Chicagoam29 by 5thHead because: Underworld



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 11:51 AM
link   
a reply to: 5thHead

So Elon wants to put worms on Mars? Mechanical earthworms. Sounds reasonable. But it will take a whole lot of epoxy to make the walls air tight.

The epoxy must flow!



posted on Feb, 29 2024 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Station27

originally posted by: chr0naut
The planet would have formed outside of the habitable zone around its star. It would never have been warm enough, for long enough, for life to have evolved.


What on Earth are you talking about? If it was a planet-sized spaceship, it wouldn't have "formed" anywhere. It would have been "built." And I hardly think it's creators would have forgotten to install a climate control system. Do you?


If it is a spaceship the size of a planet, then it won't have the same mass as a solid planet.

The theorised Planet X is because of perturbations in the orbits of the outer planets and planetoids, and also the occasional comet that falls inwards towards the sun from the Oort cloud, and the fairly rational belief that something massive must have disturbed them enough to de-orbit them.

Planet X would be a high-mass ultracold non-luminous object way out in the Oort cloud.

Perhaps the 'watchers' can live in the hard vacuum of interstellar space, feeding off matter and the very weak radiation that they happen upon. Then they wouldn't need a planet and perhaps they could clump together as a colony of aliens. Of course, their metabolism would have to be very, very slow. So much so hat we would define them as inert matter rather than living. They wouldn't be humanoid, and they'd vaporize if they got out of their freezing environment and approached the Earth. That's at least as likely as suggesting that they live in a spaceship for billions of years, so far from a star that there'd be hardly any energy to run things.



new topics

top topics



 
12
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join