It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jakal26
a reply to: Meee32
The sharp object they are being so vague about was more than likely an ink pen (my opinion only, of course).
Not really a great time for a movie reference but for those that have seen "Training Day", you might remember the scene where Denzel Washington takes out his pen and uses it to force the character Snoop Dogg is playing to cough up some crack.
I would imagine it is one of those "not in the manual" type of "teachings"....you know, the kind they teach in the field but don't write down in the manuals, that way us proles don't get all shocked and upset when we realize said tactic is "the norm"......
I know a few people that claim the cops have done this very thing to them.....how true it is in their actual cases, well...grain of salt, but nonetheless....
These pigs should be tried and hung for murder......period! (Along with MANY of their cronies and their controllers and so on and so forth until some of this corruption is under some kind of control)
At this point.....not sure what it is going to take to get us off the internet boards and into some real "action"....Hell, I'm not even sure what those "actions" (real solutions) would be......I see pitfalls in them all, at this point....Sadly.
The findings included blunt force injuries and anoxic/hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, which is when the brain does not receive enough oxygen.
“Because of the circumstances of this event, it is difficult to discern if the decedent died from a drug overdose or an asphyxia event exacerbated by either the occlusion of the airway by the foreign object, a possible vascular occlusion associated with the neck restraint, or from a combination of all the events that transpired during this incident.”
In an effort to retrieve the alleged bag, the lawsuit says police had to shove a sharp object into the teenagers throat. Lawyers for the Smiths say drugs were never found in his throat or stomach.
The autopsy report confirms this, stating that there was no indication of anything unusual found in the teens body.
Huntsville Police have however admitted two pieces of evidence into the case. The Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences determined they were both zip-lock bags of MDMA, also know as Ecstasy, which were found on the teens person.
Upon information and belief,
Defendant Officers, without proper training or expertise, shoved a sharp oblong object into
Minor N.S.’s throat
originally posted by: Meee32
They didn't cut it open in the typical sense... They cut it open from the inside by shoving a sharp object down his throat... I wanna know what that object was! Why they being vague about it? Must be bad!!!
originally posted by: Meee32
originally posted by: MarlinGrace
originally posted by: Biigs
a reply to: MarlinGrace
That is extremely disturbing.
I almost wish i haddnt read that or googled that but, thank you for posting anyway. Stay the # away from texas huh? lol
Very disturbing....
I think one of the incidents is going to cost them 6 million from a law suit. If this happened to me after a mistake by a drug sniffing dog, then they might have something to arrest me for.
Isn't it funny how the same officers went through the exact same scenario twice, that we know of... Traffic stop, drug dog (was it the same dog?), then off to the same hospital to rape them... Then they get the bill after... I would bet my life these are not the only times they did this! Someone should do a FOI request and find out exactly how many times this happens!
EDIT: Also worthy of note is how the hospitals went along with it just because the cops told em to... They said they would take responsibility and so the doctors/nurses raped away and conducted dangerous precedures for no medical reason...
This goes back to the statement of 90% will do it and the video ted talk I posted. Really, if people haven't seen it yet, they should.
originally posted by: Expat888
So instead of waiting for nature to take its course to see what if anything the kid ingested those boneheads decided to practice surgery without a license ..
Hope they get sued for maximum damages then charged for murder along with practicing medicine without license or training ..
Truly bloody amazing ..
Upon information and belief,
Defendant Officers, without proper training or expertise, shoved a sharp oblong object into
Minor N.S.’s throat
During the Defendant Officers’ unlawful arrest of Minor N.S., Defendant Officers
used such excessive and unnecessary force that Minor N.S. suffered at least two (2) broken ribs.
However, upon information and belief, Defendant Officers failed to inform the responding
Paramedics of Minor N.S.’s additional injuries.
Minor N.S.’s family was not informed at the time that Minor N.S. had
suffered from a cardiac arrest and was rendered unconscious.
Oh he had ecstacy? Defo deserved to die then, I take it all back! /s
originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: Meee32
Police lie all the time. Even when it would be easier to tell the truth. I have been arrested more than once and it was not pleasant, to say the least. Had my shoulder dislocated by a cop and was kept in jail for almost 48 hours like that before I finally got medical attention. My crime? Skinnydipping. True story.
No one is disputing that they used excessive force. No one is saying they didn't kneel on his back. That is not even remotely what I said. Please stop putting words in my mouth. none of that is necessary.
I read between the lines... You make all sorts of assumptions and try to pass them off as fact, then berate the papers for doing the same...
originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: Meee32
I read between the lines... You make all sorts of assumptions and try to pass them off as fact, then berate the papers for doing the same...
It was not an assumption in the least. I linked the actual lawsuit, which if you had bothered to read before you started talking smack, would have shown you that. It states in the lawsuit that he sold drugs to the "informant", and said that he attempted to flee from the officers. "Reading between the lines" suggests that you actually read it, when obviously you did not. Everything I said was sourced and the links were provided, so sorry but no. Try again. Maybe actually read the lines, instead of between them.
So my question is why give THEM the benefit of the doubt?