It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I debunked this thread on pg2.
Grimpachi
reply to post by SasquatchHunter
I debunked this thread on pg2.
Only in your mind. I guess you want everyone to "move along don't look here folks you promise there is nothing to see."
It’s funny how you brought up aliens. If the lady walked out saying we believe in aliens she would have been a candidate for the funny farm but when it comes to invisible creatures that are supposed to be all knowing, all powerful, everywhere yet nowhere and wants your soul then somehow that’s OK.
moon does not emit light
GaryN
The surface of the Moon is lit mostly by Earthshine, with some 'airglow' in the Lunar ionosphere, from solar UV exciting a region of the Lunar ionosphere.
Transverse EM waves, the light from Earth, falls of at the inverse square law, but the Moon is still withing that distance, so there is enough light for them to be able to see on the Lunar surface, even though that light is about the same as dusk on Earth. They did the tests that showed they could operate by Earthshine alone, which is like Earth 20 minutes after sunset, any extra brightness from the Sun is from airglow above the Lunar surface, not like light from a big lamp.
wmd:
The light they have on the ISS is mainly reflected from the clouds on Earth. The airglow is also much brighter than it is on the Lunar surface, but again this is from solar UV exciting atoms in the thin ionosphere above the ISS, and not like sunlight on Earth. In many images from Shuttle and ISS, you will notice the lack of well defined shadows, a sign that the light source is very diffuse. Where there are sharp shadows, it is simple to tell that they are from the spotlights on their helmets or on the Canadarm, or some of the other high intensity lighting they have. It's all a show up there.
And you can ridicule all you want, but it is "most of the people fooled most of the time" in this case. Until NASA does some simple experiments, there is no PROOF that the Moon can be seen from orbit, except through that little band of ionosphere they like to show us. Not good enough. The experiments are so simple that the fact they have not been performed should raise alarms, but I guess nobody notices that the emporer has no clothes. Show me the video of the Moon I've been asking for, from the Canadarm video cameras, the simplest, cheapest, quickest test of them all, then you can mock.
GaryN
reply to post by Tylerdurden1
If you want to get technical, then the Moon does emit its own light. Gamma rays, x-rays, ultraviolet, infrared. They are all light, just not within the range of human vision.
And if the Sun emits white light, a full visible wavelength spectrum, then why does white sunlight reflected from a browny-red lunar surface look white? I haven't seen a computer graphics program yet where you can get white light reflected from a dull red surface to look white, or silvery white like the Moon.
Here is an image of the FAR side of the Moon.
xstealth
I live in a rural area, nothing but Christians around me.
I leave the shed door open all day, leave my truck unlocked, and nothing ever goes missing..ever. As a matter of fact, there has never been a crime here except non-Christians coming into the area.
It's terrible I tell you, living around a bunch of people with high morals and life values. sickening...
GaryN
reply to post by wmd_2008
Here is an image of the FAR side of the Moon.
Where is it from, which mission? The Earth should show some blue, the Moon should be reddish-brown, I suspect the image is of IR or UV 'light', not visible wavelengths.
I don't know what you are getting at with the picture sin the windowsill. Obviously two different exposure settings. Please explain.