It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ALL I can say, is I am in no way trying to scare anyone....I am trying to learn myself and educate myself and others.......
GaryN
reply to post by ItDepends
ALL I can say, is I am in no way trying to scare anyone....I am trying to learn myself and educate myself and others.......
That's commendable, and if you take the time to become educated about nuclear physics, which isn't as tough as you might first think, you will discover that there is much being put forward by mainstream media that is totally untrue. Also, to balance things out some, you should at least read some of the articles written by people who DO know about all this stuff, and have worked in civilian and military settings, and have qualifications too. This article is quite informative, as is much else on the site. In the comments section, anti-nuke folk are not locked out or scorned or insulted, generally just pointed in the propper direction so they can learn some science, rather than just listening to the mainstream media, who are only interested in bringing in readers to boost their revenue.
Fear mongering over WATER leaks at Fukushima Dai-ichi
atomicinsights.com...
Nuclear Expert: Biggest concern at Fukushima is the huge source of radioactivity from molten fuel and spent fuel pools winding up in ocean — “The health of the entire Northern Pacific is at stake”
GuidedKill
reply to post by GaryN
What about the MOX fuel rods stored in #3? I have read that they are a new type of fuel rod being used and are believed to be ten times worse than a "regular" Plutonium rod. Do you think this is true or not? I know for a fact most countries with nuclear plants do not run these type of rods. To be honest I have no idea so really just a question to anyone that knows not fear mongering.
Wiki
autopat51
reply to post by GaryN
the main stream media..says nothing. they avoid this issue like the plague.
i see you are from Canada..you tube is full of your fellow Canadians geigering
rain water..and the results ARE alarming! Arnie Gunderson (whom i respect as an authority)
has been reporting on this since the beginning does not hold a lot of hope for this situation.
he just recently stated that the chance of fuel rod extraction happening successfully was grim at best.
anyone who can sit behind a keyboard and say everything is fine..is surely out of touch.
have a nice day and eat more Pacific seafood!
What about the MOX fuel rods stored in #3?
Arnie Gunderson (whom i respect as an authority)
I got my MS and PhD at RPI a few years after Gundersen was there. RPI’s reactor was donated by the American Locomotive Co and was originally to be used for developing a nuclear train locomotive. It was reconfigured to use as a training reactor that could generate 200 Watts of power — or two big light bulbs worth. It had two means of shutting down: the control Rods with fuel followers could be dropped (removing fuel from the center of the core) and inserting poison. The backup means of shutting the reactor down was to dump the moderator to a holding tank. Yes! Core uncovery was the back up shutdown mechanism.
...
Comparing the RPI training reactor certification to an SRO license in a power reactor is ridiculous!
There was no training on ESF systems, reactivity controls, chemistry, decay heat removal, feed water/condensate systems, the turbine and condenser etc.
For him to be parading himself around as an SRO is absurd and he needs to be called down for that.
.you tube is full of your fellow Canadians geigering rain water..and the results ARE alarming!
have a nice day and eat more Pacific seafood!
Fair enough and I appreciate your civil dialogue.
Spent fuel rods can catch fire if they loose cooling, but it depends on how old they are. Fresh ones might ignite in a few days, older ones perhaps not at all. If they caught fire they could be worse than a reactor melt down as there is no containment building, but there should be lots of time to get water onto them, they don't just instantly catch fire if the water level is too low.
And on spent fuel pools:
Detergent
Outrage would be properly directed toward anyone who can now stop this disaster and yet does not. Anger at those who could have prevented it and did not is understandable but is of no benefit to the current situation. Outrage against no one who knows how to stop it now is completely illogical. Energy is now better directed to forming a coalition of those who might just have some reasonable solutions.
horselessheadsman
If you ever seen the movie "idiocracy" you know what's happening here. Pour some Gatoraid, it's what Fukashima craves.
ItDepends
horselessheadsman
If you ever seen the movie "idiocracy" you know what's happening here. Pour some Gatoraid, it's what Fukashima craves.
I'll check it out. Thanks!!!
horselessheadsman
ItDepends
horselessheadsman
If you ever seen the movie "idiocracy" you know what's happening here. Pour some Gatoraid, it's what Fukashima craves.
I'll check it out. Thanks!!!
Oh you really do need to if you haven't seen it. Literally modern America.
Skywatcher2011
Why does this have to be a Japan Crisis when this is still clearly a world crisis? Shouldn't all countries affected be chipping in to help with the repair of the plant? Surely if North America cared enough to send in experts to stop the leak this would happen. It is as if the Elite want everyone to die off through radiation poisoning? It makes me mad how the Japanese government has been lying through its teeth to preserve their ego.
Irradiated water at Tokyo Electric Power Co. (9501)’s Fukushima plant will probably have to be dumped into the ocean after contamination is brought to safe levels, an adviser to the company’s water management task force said. The ocean release will be necessary because water can’t be stored in tanks indefinitely at the Dai-Ichi station after being used to cool the plant’s overheating reactor fuel, Lake Barrett, a former official with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, wrote in a Sept. 9 opinion piece posted on the website of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.
The article by Barrett, who’ll be advising the utility known as Tepco on water management at the site, could offer clues to its strategy for handling the 338,000 metric tons of contaminated water stored in more than 1,000 tanks at the plant. That amount is increasing by about 400 tons a day.
“Spending billions and billions of yen on building tanks to try to capture almost every drop of water on the site is unsustainable, wasteful, and counterproductive,” Barrett wrote.
“I see no realistic alternative to a program that cleans up water with improved processing systems so it meets very protective Japanese release standards and then, after public discussion, conducts an independently confirmed, controlled release to the sea.”
TEPCO Official Admits Fukushima "Out Of Control"
A month ago, when we quoted an independent expert that "TEPCO has lost control of Fukushima" many took offense, despite all signs to the contrary. Perhaps the skeptics will reevaluate their position following today's news reported by AFP, which cited Kazuhiko Yama#a, who holds the executive-level title of "fellow" at Tokyo Electric Power, who finally admitted what those not mired in prejudice about the state of nuclear energy refuse to accept, that the nuclear plant was "not under control." This promptly led to the government, which last weekend learned it would host the 2020 Olympics and promised that Fukushima would not be a concern by then, to scramble and "reassure people on Friday that they have a lid on Fukushima." Unfortunately, the lies, like the radiation in the plant, are now finally seeping through and more are becoming fully aware of just how serious the catastrophe truly is, and drove yet another steak through the heart of the official narrative by Prime Minister Abe as they "flatly contradict" his assurances