It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by Biigs
please read the link i provided in the last page regarding WTC-7
I find it really interesting that first its "it collapsed in its own footprint"
...."err no it didn't Mr. Truther here are some pic's to prove it"
"ahhh well it was close enough..... anyway..."
The pics you posted show it collapsed in it's own footprint! It's a pile of rubble where the building stood.
Just ignore all the eye witness accounts,
expert analysis and solid documented evidence
and believe the politicians and paid officials who tell the original story.
Did I miss something or is there actually some evidence that's finally come out big enough that it will have to be addressed by official channels & MSM?
OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by Merinda
Truthers always like this argument "no other steel tall building has ever collapsed due to office fires"
And they are right
Just a petty the argument is inherently flawed as it ignore so many crucial details such as the weaknesses in the design of the building, the fact that these fired burned uncontrolled with no attempt made to extinguish them for hours and the structural damage to the building for example
Now if truthers could show me a a copy of WTC-7 and i mean a exact copy down to the last bolt and let it burn uncontrolled for hours on end with the same structural damage with no attempt to extinguish the fires then they would have a fair comparison.
Comparing WTC-7 to a building in burning in China is like comparing it to a house made of straw.
I do not accept the fact that no other building has collapsed due to fires as a valid reason to think it was a deliberate demolition.
I would have all 3 buildings rebuilt to the exact same specs.
Then I would have remote controlled planes (just like on 9/11 - global hawk) fly into the towers exactly like they did on 9/11.
The planes would be loaded with jet fuel just as they were said to be.
lisaleaks.com...
On September 10th, 2001. Rumsfeld reported $2.3 TRILLION missing from the Pentagon. ‘Dov Zakheim’ Pentagon Comptroller. Former VP of ‘Systems Planning Corporation’ (Flight Termination System). Signatore of PNAC document.
www.public-action.com...
"Robot plane flies Pacific unmanned," which appeared in the April 24, 2001 edition of Britain's International Television News :
"The aircraft essentially flies itself, right from takeoff, right through to landing, and even taxiing off the runway," according to the Australian Global Hawk manager Rod Smith. Here is an excerpt from that article:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A robot plane has made aviation history by becoming the first unmanned aircraft to fly across the Pacific Ocean.
The American high-altitude Global Hawk spy plane made flew (sic) across the ocean to Australia, defence officials confirmed.
The Global Hawk, a jet-powered aircraft with a wingspan equivalent to a Boeing 737 flew from Edwards Air Force Base in California and landed late on Monday at the Royal Australian Air Force base at Edinburgh, in South Australia state... [NOTE: two of the aircraft involved in the 911 crashes were Boeing 757s, two were Boeing 767s]
It flies along a pre-programmed flight path, but a pilot monitors the aircraft during its flight via a sensor suite which provides infra-red and visual images.