It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SkepticOverlord
GoKill
Breaking:Russia Today News Declares 9/11 An Inside Job False Flag Attack.
Why aren't more people aware that "Russia Today" is a state-mandated media organization, launched and funded by Russia, with the sole purpose of making the USA look bad, and Russia look good. Oh, and, they have permission to lie from Putin.
Why is this a considered source for ATS members?
RT was conceived by former media minister Mikhail Lesin,[16] and Vladimir Putin’s press spokesperson Aleksei Gromov.[17] At the time of RT’s founding RIA Novosti director Svetlana Mironyuk stated: "Unfortunately, at the level of mass consciousness in the West, Russia is associated with three words: communism, snow and poverty," and added "We would like to present a more complete picture of life in our country.
This subject has been dissected, analyzed and debated ad nauseam for years. If the circumstances surrounding how those buildings fell were so easily explained, the debate would have been over a long time ago, it's not just a bunch of crackpots that oppose the ideas you and others who back the OS put forward.
The simple fact of the matter is that no other steel structured highrise on Earth has ever collapsed in the way that any of the WTC buildings did in the history of the world, much less all on the same day. That in itself is a pretty compelling reason to take notice.
If that was the end of the inconsistencies then hey, I could chalk it up to a strange day and an act of God but as you and I both know, that is just where the inconsistencies begin about 9/11 isn't it.
I respect your opinion but I'm not buying what your selling my man.
mrnotobc
When I was a kid it was Russia who was doing all the lying. Now it's us, or I should say our ptb. If the American people don't put a stop to this, then it's time the rest of the world does. We'll deserve what happens to us if any of us are able to even survive, because we just sat by and watched it happen. Kind of like how we thought about the German people after WWII.
GoKill
Breaking:Russia Today News Declares 9/11 An Inside Job False Flag Attack.
Yep that's right time to move 911 out of the Conspiracies section. You knew it would happen eventually, well the time is now.
Demand ATS move it out of the Conspiracies section.
MSM is now reporting it. Yeah some will say it's just Putin turning up the heat on Syria. I say they were saving there ace in the hole.
edit on 9-9-2013 by GoKill because: title to long
FlyersFan
It's Russia. OF COURSE they are going to say that. They aren't exactly unbiased.
I trust them as much as anyone else ... meaning .. not at all.
9/11 wasn't a false flag attack. Radical Islamics on Jihad. Yes it happens.
HOWEVER ... it was used by Rumsfeld and Cheney to further their own agendas.
It was an opportunity that they fully exploited.
I'm sure the usual 9/11 crowd will get on here and be rude and whatever.
But that's the truth of it .... radical Islam happens ... and politicians take
full advantage of those situations.
openeye
reply to post by jhn7537
I find it fascinating that you believe a fire burning on multiple floors could be able to make Building 7 fail all at once creating a scenario where the building collapsed in its own foot print at free fall speed.
Can you show me other evidence of of steel high rise buildings collapsing at free fall speed due to a fire?
Building 7 wasn't packed full of polyester and cotton toys.
It was constructed with certified steel which had been coated with fire retardant material.
Well firstly the building did not fall at free fall speed, near free fall speed perhaps but not exactly. Secondly in no way did it fall in its own foot print (like in a demolition), neither did the other WTC towers.
WTC7 collapsed in a total of 13 seconds not the 6/7 seconds as many youtubers claim. The central portion of the building came down a good 5 to 6 seconds before the rest of the building.
And you can clearly see that the collapse was not a straight down demolition style collapse as the buildings around WTC7 were severely damaged by the collapse.
Despite a steel framed highrise building never collapsing like WTC7 did on 9/11 does not negate the possibility of such a catastrophic failure from occurring. The fact that fire has not been shown to be the catalyst of the collapse of buildings in the past is practically irrelevant, especially because there have been no other events similar to the ones on 9/11 (i.e. large steel framed skyscrapers being subjected to a bombardment of flying debris causing structural damage and fires that burn without hindrance). Not to mention that not all steel framed buildings are built the same or will react the same to different variates of punishment.edit on 9-9-2013 by openeye because: clarification