It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Fact remains 3 buildings, 2 planes... It's simple math really....
Helious
reply to post by openeye
Yet you fail to mention the droves of ACTUAL structural engineers that firmly state building 7 pancaking from fire violates the law of physics and is impossible and can not be recreated, however when you add explosives into the scenario, it accounts for all the dynamics of the implosion.
You also failed to mention the BBC reporting building 7's collapse 20 minutes before it happened, and actually being able to see building 7 still standing in the newscast they reported it collapsing. Come on man.......
OtherSideOfTheCoin
Helious
reply to post by openeye
Yet you fail to mention the droves of ACTUAL structural engineers that firmly state building 7 pancaking from fire violates the law of physics and is impossible and can not be recreated, however when you add explosives into the scenario, it accounts for all the dynamics of the implosion.
You also failed to mention the BBC reporting building 7's collapse 20 minutes before it happened, and actually being able to see building 7 still standing in the newscast they reported it collapsing. Come on man.......
This thread explains it all
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Can you show me other evidence of of steel high rise buildings collapsing at free fall speed due to a fire?
OtherSideOfTheCoin
Helious
reply to post by openeye
Yet you fail to mention the droves of ACTUAL structural engineers that firmly state building 7 pancaking from fire violates the law of physics and is impossible and can not be recreated, however when you add explosives into the scenario, it accounts for all the dynamics of the implosion.
You also failed to mention the BBC reporting building 7's collapse 20 minutes before it happened, and actually being able to see building 7 still standing in the newscast they reported it collapsing. Come on man.......
This thread explains it all
www.abovetopsecret.com...
OtherSideOfTheCoin
You know the other day I put up a thread, its about 11.000 words all in that discusses WTC-7, i put months of work into putting it together, 7 flags and about 2 pages of comments.
Whats the point, why did I even bother doing that when really ATS doesn't actually care any more about truth, oh no, you guys are more into "YAY, YouTube Videos that agree with us".
I find it fascinating that you believe a fire burning on multiple floors could be able to make Building 7 fail all at once creating a scenario where the building collapsed in its own foot print at free fall speed.
Can you show me other evidence of of steel high rise buildings collapsing at free fall speed due to a fire?
Building 7 wasn't packed full of polyester and cotton toys.
It was constructed with certified steel which had been coated with fire retardant material.
The most popular threads are always going to be the stupidest. Sad but true
Despite a steel framed highrise building never collapsing like WTC7 did on 9/11 does not negate the possibility of such a catastrophic failure from occurring.
And why should we believe you rather than these guys?
patriotsquestion911.com...
patriotsquestion911.com...
Are your credentials more valid than theirs?