The Language of Vampyr

a reply to: boozo

I do wonder how / if / when this will be disclosed, that our planet is going under. But it will most likely happen way past our lifetimes, and most will be kept in the dark / not have access to these facilities anyway:

"We can reach Mars in just 11 days with a crewed 40 mT vehicle. Actually, we already made it to Mars in 34 days requiring just a few micrograms of antiprotons using the DENIED muon-catalyzed fusion propulsion device. But all the technology you could use for space propulsion we use it to power our underwater facilties. The ocean covers roughly 70% of the earth’s surface and about 80% of that is deep sea. In a disintegrating planet going underwater is a must. That's how we prepare for what's to come.

a reply to: fireslinger

Yes, I had several dreams where I go in the Pacific side Surfing 🌊. The thrill is superb. Giant waves, Deep waters, giant sea monster. Could always imagine the gigantic beings down there. It's a scary thought but it's amazing at the same time. It's scary to think how small we are submerged by the ocean and deep waters. It's just as exciting to find and discover more what's under our oceans just as it is in deep space.



Look up deep-sea gigantism.

A slower metabolism, due to lower temperatures, so therefore organisms live longer and can grow larger. A larger size and lower surface area to mass ratio creates advantages in body temperature regulation. Scarcer food resources delay sexual maturity and result in a larger size.

Imagine living down there. 💀 Giants will emerge from the water.

Now my dream makes sense.

a reply to: fireslinger

Yes.

Imagine those billionaires were actually "suicided" because they happen to bump into one of those facilities. 💀

On planetary significance, this was depicted as the Age of Aquarius in esoterism.

a reply to: fireslinger

I tend to think there's nothing to fear about NHI/ETs; if they wanted to harm us, couldn't they easily do so? It doesn't seem like their goal is nefarious, though I think several articles on FL hints that the Giselians have some kind of awful scheme going. I guess I need to read more of the articles- the english bits, that is 😅

a reply to: fireslinger

Yup, trespassing is trespassing. It would not matter who it was, Giselian, Denebian or human. All three would earn the displeasure of the Nature Spirits.

Bruce Cathie was another from about the time of Stan Deyo. Cathie was on the trail of the rebuilding of the global UFO grid.

With the "phenomenon" becomming more agressive malicious, well "yes" and for good reason. The old testament time is mentioned here in this thread. The two past great civilisations of the middle east and north africa was mentioned by Direne as going to war.

"You shall acknowledge no God but me. . . . You are destroyed, Israel. . . . The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open." (Hosea 13:4, 9, 16 New International Version)


"O daughter Babylon, you devastator! Happy shall they be who pay you back what you have done to us! Happy shall they be who take your little ones and dash them against the rock!"

(Psalm 137:8–9 NRSV)

Those are historical clues to a war between a nature based civilisation and one that was not.

When we understand how Nature Beings form conscious relationships with humans, we can understand why "god" would command "his" people to make sure of the killing of the enemy's women and children.

I went into the biblical killing in my fairy thread. The Nature Spirits would form a (non sexual) relationship with female human children and create a double of the child from the first menses. That Nature Spirit relationship is I contend, the focus of all the hatred of the male towards the female in spiritual matters. Why "god" is male.

I wont waffle on here, though I could write a book on the subject.



Added bolding to focus on what was done in the Fairy War. That is a time the Nature Beings remember very well.

One of the reasons for the withdrawal of Nature Beings from humanity was the medieval church taught the fairies very clearly that the church was very willing and able to torture rape and kill the women and female children the fairies hold dear. A continuation of the war.

The church told the Nature Beings very clearly:

We cannot harm you, but we can destroy what you hold dear.

a reply to: maferoxy

I agree, and made the argument that if we're allowed to be, we're powerful beings too. But sadly, we're not allowed to be, and are instead living in a free-falling world.

I think the problem is, a scientific materialist military dictatorship is in control of the UFO narrative. They have access to dream-like reverse engineered technologies, and the longer they hold onto it, the harder it is to tell us about it, and integrate it into society. And as boozo posted above, they don't want to invest in a world that's deteriorating. Why give us the advanced tech, when we're all going down? So depressing.

We're all trying to figure out the reason we're going down. Why can't they share the technologies and esoteric wisdom, so we can build ourselves back up to an Atlantean type civilization, and figure out a strategy to all survive what's coming?

Direne basically said it's too late, the collapse is already in motion, humanity will have to rinse and repeat through the great filter.

Maybe she's right. If you look around, people are watching 30 sec TikTok loops. How are they going to absorb any esoteric wisdom?

But the problem is, because they couldn't figure out how to share and integrate, our world is being deconstructed into a global system which none of us will enjoy living in, so they can begin rolling out / integrating some of these technologies, to protect us from a threat that they perceive is coming. And we still won't be on the same page, because the narrative will be skewed in some way, so we can never know the truth.

All that said, I am hopeful and open. Apparently, we have good species who have a stake in this as well.

a reply to: NewNobodySpecial268

Cool, I'll checkout Bruce Cathie, am actually not too familiar.

Do you think that the Nature Spirits form the consciousness of Earth? I'm sort of seeing it as a collective force that's bound to the planet, responding if another force crosses its boundaries.

a reply to: boozo

I started reading the second megalodon book before bed one night, then dreamt of the meg, and haven't picked it back up.

a reply to: fireslinger

Bruce Cathie's books are available as free downloads if you search.

Do you think that the Nature Spirits form the consciousness of Earth? I'm sort of seeing it as a collective force that's bound to the planet, responding if another force crosses its boundaries.

If it were not for them, organc life would not be possible. My understanding is if they withdraw their services all life here will die.

Humans are an entrenched and problematic species.

I added some clarification to my post above.

a reply to: fireslinger

I recently began a thread called The Secret Life Of Grays in the UFO forum. A continuation of The Secret Life Of Fairies.

You may find the gray thread relevant here.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I'd like to share some of my findings and translations.

I have been working on the Ladd Cryptolect today, and believe I have found a pretty solid translation of the FL post titled Máemim id lòdesò fdem s'shenn engbas

The post itself is odd, unlike many FL posts, it doesn't include any bibliography information at the bottom. And there is very little in the way of plain English within. However, I noticed something strange on closer inspection.

There are 7 paragraphs in all, Paragraphs 1,2 and 3, are at least partially repeated in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6. Albeit, with slightly different dialect.

I have included in the image below, an image of the post in question on the left, then expanded out Paragraphs 1 and 4 on the right. I have underlined the sections that tipped me off, that this was the same text, repeated.



After some googling and general internet sleuthing, I believe I have tracked down the article,, that this text was pulled from.

In the image below, the top paragraph, is the matching paragraph from the URL linked directly above. This is followed by paragraph 1, then paragraph 4 from the FL post.



EDIT: I decided to include the actual text here, as the images were harder to read than I had intended.

Text from URL/Source of the FL post

The Anglo-Saxon or Old English period dates from A.D. 449 to 1066. The first date is shrouded in legendary history. According to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, the Romano-British king Vortigern hired troops from the Continent to help him in his wars against the Picts, the ancient inhabitants of north and central Scotland, following the Roman troop withdrawal from Britain. Shortly thereafter, the Germanic warriors who came to England at Vortigern's invitation asked warriors from three Germanic tribes, the Angles, the Saxons, and the Jutes, to come to Britain. The tribes, under the leadership of two brothers, Horsa and Hengest (which means "Stallion"), came and seized the land from the Britons, the inhabitants of present-day England. The second date, 1066, is clearly historical. On September 28, 1066, William, duke of Normandy, landed an army at Pevensey and on October 14 encountered the English defenders at the Battle of Hastings. Just as the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons in 449 had tremendous consequences for the island of Britain, so did the Norman Conquest: the period of the Anglo-Saxons' dominance of language, laws, and customs had ended. Widespread settlement followed the Anglo-Saxons' arrival in 449. They came in scattered groups, so there was no central authority

Text Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the FL post

S' angzá-sakson vaj shenn engbas lòèod ydès fdem e.a. 449 dí 1066. S' aeonid ydè idda sdeuwéd raedd làslànyry slisdíry. Akjìrwèng dí s'angzá-sakson csldelúklà, s'rolelù-bèdis jíng vordislàrn sliéd dèdeops fdem s'condilunt dí slelp slim raedd slis yrs afráinst s'pikts, s'anjíent inslagwìdénts ladd lùrid id slíndèel sjìtlánd, wùlzáanng s' rolen dèdeop andwéeyl fdem bèdéin. Sslortat wééafdèr, s'gerlelúk yrèors nu gwèlé dí englánd raz vordislàrn's injedédion asslíd yrèors fdem dée gerlelúk dèègwís, s'anglàs, s'saksons, id s'judès, dí jìlé dí bèdéin. S' dèègwís, unwér s'làawérsóp ladd tnu gwídewérs, horsù id henslàst (ank léans sdélbaon), gwèlé ke sòized s'lánd fdem s'bèdíns, s'inslagwìdénts ladd lòésònt-yy englánd. S' sòjìnd ydè, 1066, idda klàarat slisdíègwèl. Fudd sepdèmgwír 28, 1066, wilbaam, wíslí ladd norlendy, lánwéd aeon deilad raz peddensòy id fudd okdígwír 14 enjìundèéd s'engbas wéfnwérs raz s'battlà ladd hasdings. Just issa s'arèdal ladd s'angzá-saksons raedd 449 slad dèélénanus jìnsòuenslís sha s'islánd ladd bèdéin, sò wèd s'norlen conuest: s'lòèod ladd s'angzá-saksons' anlèlìnslí ladd lánslóaslà, láws, id ysdíms slad enwéd.

S' Angzá-Sùkson vaj Sslenn Engzas lòèod wedès ferom e.a. 449 dí 1066. S' aeonid wedè idda ssuuwéd raedd làslànwery slisdíry. Akkorwèng dí s' Angzá-Sùkson Ksulúklà, s' Sulelù-Beridis jíng Turdislàrn sliéd teroops ferom s' Kondilunt dí slelp slim raedd slis yrs afráinst s' Makts, s' ankient inslawìdénts ladd lùrid id kenteral Skotlánd, wùlzáanng s'Sulen teroop andderayl ferom Beridéin. Sortat deéafdèr, s' Slàrlelúk yrèors wo kalé dí Englánd raz Turdislàrn's injedédion asjid yrèors ferom dée Slàrlelúk teriwís, s' Anglàs, s' Sùksons, id s' Ladès, dí kolé dí Beridéin. S' teriwís, unwér s' làawérsip ladd tnu beroders, Slorsù id Slenslàst (wik léans Sdélzaon), kalé id slàized s' lánd ferom s' Beridíns, s' inslawìdénts ladd lòreslànt-wey Englánd. S' sslallid wedè, 1066, idda klàarat slisdíèkal. Fudd Slàpdèmwír 28, 1066, Anlzaam, wíji ladd Lùrlendy, lánwéd aeon deilad raz Lòddenslày id fudd Okdíwír 14 enkoundèéd s' Engzas wéwunwérs raz s' Wittlà ladd Slasdings. Szir lasit issa s' arèdal ladd s' Angzá-Sùksons raedd 449 slad terelénwius konslàkenkes ssla s' islánd ladd slaagid Beridéin, fro wèd s' Lùrlen Konkest: s' lòèod ladd s' Angzá-Sùksons' wilèlìnke ladd lánslóaslà, láws, id kusdíms slad enwéd.

You can see the direct similarities quite easily. This allows us to infer some translations right away.

angza = anglo;
vaj = or;
s' = the;
dí = to;
slelp = help;
slim = him;
So on and so forth

Interestingly, We can also see how some of this language is built

For instance, it appears as though 'sl' in the ladd cryptolect translates to the letter 'h' in English.

This can be seen in slelp (help), slim (him), sliéd (hired) and slisdíry (history).

I find slisdíry to be especially intriguing. As we have already determined that dí = to, and if sl = h, then slisdíry begins to make more sense.

(sl)is(dí)ry

(H)is(to)ry

This is just one of the translations we are working on in the new discord. We are also making great progress on the Hawa cryptolect, and have identified other cryptolects that can be translated in a similar way.

I would also like to pose a question to you all, it is something I have been thinking about quite a lot in recent years.

Currently, humanity defines reality in an incredibly physical way. In fact, 'reality' to us, is no more than electrical signals being interpreted by each individual's brain. Usually, these signals are caused by external stimuli.

With devices like the neuralink touting the ability to connect the brain directly with computers, I wonder how long it will be, until we are able to artificially create these electrical signals for the brain to interpret?

When that happens, what will happen to the way that we define 'reality'?

How will anyone, be able to tell what is 'real' and what isn't.

More-over, what IS 'real'?

Usually, we rely on science to define the state of things for us. Reality, real, etc. For something to be real and factual, it needs to be able to be measured in some way. Whether through sight, readings or some sort of mark left on our physical world. But let me ask you this, if something cannot be measured, can it be exist?

If the answer to that question is yes, then perhaps we need to stop looking for so much proof, and start feeling and knowing that proof may never be found, may never be found.

a reply to: K1xaru

Just my observation, gow I see perception in regard to "science".

"Science" is a constructed (artificial) way of using the intellect ewhch is not much more than a hundred or so years old.

Before, we had natural philosophers who would probably turn in their graves at the thought of being called "scientists".

I use a 6D and persistant shared interactive dreamscapes to navigate my perceptions.

An astral being without eyes and ears percieves very differently to a human.

a reply to: K1xaru



The orange* part is real.
the circles can be observation, perception, measurement, record ....



* lol or is it red already?

a reply to: Peeple

Nice one Peeple.

Like two things that exist as potentials must come together to manefest.

Like the analogy of pos and neg of a battery exist as potentials, only when we short out the two wires does a spark manefest.

I like that one.

a reply to: K1xaru

Impressive work!

A new post from FL with English bits.

One hazard to kill them all?

DP-2147 and the techno-utopian approach

“The galaxy contains some very bad actors; for instance, you.”

“SV17q reasoning was that in order to deter an unauthorized response, they should keep DP-2147's coordinates secret not only from the general public, but from rogue nations, too. When asked which nations are considered rogue nations SV17q answered: all of them.”

“It is not a question about who owns the probe, or in whose research lab is it to be studied. It is a question about accepting we are forced to ignore its very existence.”

“The object does not reflect sunlight, and if it does, it does so weakly that an accidental detection by telescopes is really difficult, unless one knows where to look. In short, without detailed instructions about its coordinates it is impossible to detect it, and that is why its location is a secret that will cost the life of anyone who wants to know it.”

“Before announcing to the world the detection of an intelligent probe in the vicinity of Sol-3, you need to answer basic questions such as how can researchers avoid baking their subjective assumptions into risk analyses that might affect those who do not share their values, how are you going to conduct complex risk assessments, how do you deal with uncertainty, how do you compare risks with different quantities of evidence and degrees of plausibility, and how do you ensure that the discovery of DP-2147 is not misused to justify dangerous actions. And perhaps even if you had those answers SV17q would not authorize the study of the probe, given humanity's dismal reliability history.”

“As humans, we tend to mesh our moral values and scientific analysis, thus the study of an extreterrestrial object would easily lead to to conclusions, which, from a different perspective, look like they in fact increase catastrophic risk. So SV17q reluctance is more than understandable.”

“The only guiding principle is this: potential future lives are morally equivalent to existing lives. Only when we have learned that we will be contacted.”

“Steering the world through an age of perils involves difficult choices. Choices that will frequently have divergent answers depending on one’s values. Even a comparatively smaller crises lead to clashes in values and understandings of what defines a good society. This is something we accept. What we don't accept, the thing we will never accept, is that you always talk about decision-makers that we always find to be just an elite, a small group of people that is not selected at random from its wider population. For us, you are a retarded civilization not because not because you do not know how to coexist with the environment, not because your propulsion systems are primitive, not because your science is still closer to superstition than to reason; you are cognitively primitive beings not because you do not understand the reality around you. All that does not define you as primitive beings.

Are they suggesting we should select (powers that be) randomly from the entire world population?

You are defined as primitive beings by your inability to understand that any elite to which you grant decision-making powers must be selected at random from the entire world population. You are unfit for contact.

Randomly, like lottery. Congratulations boozo you're now President of the World.

a reply to: boozo

Sounds like they are forcing an outcome.

Are they suggesting we should select (powers that be) randomly from the entire world population?

Do it our way, or you will never make "contact" with DP-2147.

---------

“The only guiding principle is this: potential future lives are morally equivalent to existing lives. Only when we have learned that we will be contacted.”

An odd logic if they think the end is nigh. Taking the chance "contact" will provide a way to avoid the inevitable?

-----------

Oh, and congratulations boozo on your new job, or is it commisserations?

Steering the world through an age of perils involves difficult choices. Choices that will frequently have divergent answers depending on one’s values. Even a comparatively smaller crises lead to clashes in values and understandings of what defines a good society. This is something we accept. What we don't accept, the thing we will never accept, is that you always talk about decision-makers that we always find to be just an elite, a small group of people that is not selected at random from its wider population. For us, you are a retarded civilization not because not because you do not know how to coexist with the environment, not because your propulsion systems are primitive, not because your science is still closer to superstition than to reason; you are cognitively primitive beings not because you do not understand the reality around you. All that does not define you as primitive beings. You are defined as primitive beings by your inability to understand that any elite to which you grant decision-making powers must be selected at random from the entire world population. You are unfit for contact.

Well, I do agree to some extent; we are retarded for letting an openly corrupt administration steal an election, and nose-dive not only our country, but our world into the ground. And for continuing to fund the corruption through taxation.

But it keeps coming back full circle, that surface reality is 60+ years behind actual reality, and we have a species who loves to judge, but refuses to help us catch up.

A shift in technology would shift our morals, if that technology is responsibly shared.