It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ON ALCOHOLISM
the problem with your statements is that the watchtower doesnt discourage professional help when needed. like i said, even with watchtowers back to the 50's there was no mention of professional help.
i sorry to hear about your father. but the fact is, he cannot be absolved of his responsibility in the matter.
as for your mother not doing research, i feel bad. because they are constantly encouraging people to do personal study. to find things out for themselves.
on the other subject
sure russell was imperfect. but so was moses, so was abraham, so was job.
imperfection doesnt mean that god wont use a person to fulfill his will. the preaching work has to be done. if you have chosen to leave because of people in that imperfect organization, then so be it. that is your decision.
Originally posted by miriam0566
stretch the truth some more.
first off... the inquisition was the church torturing and killing people of different faiths.
I am talking about the spirit of inquisition, which Jesus never displayed, yet which is fully endemic within the Watchtower. It is therefore, anti-Christ.
with all due respect, GET REAL.
a person going door to door preaching about something they believe in is not the inquisitionary spirit.
second, where the heck is all this sexual tension you have coming from?
Originally posted by chickenshoes
Look, I don't have time to look it up, but as a kid, the elders and articles in the watchtower always discouraged outside help from a mental health professional. It's true, and no I can't show you where I saw it, but suffice it to say it was drummed into my head from the day I was born.
And who made you the judge of my father?
I cannot reason with your use of circular logic.
Originally posted by MatrixProphet
I realize you will discount everything we all say. But the point is: we are saying it, and you will recall these posts. You are a babe! You are new to the whole program even if you have relatives or friends that are witnesses - it is not the same as being a member.
you are trying to warn me about this organization right? you made a claim and i looked into it. im telling you its not there. not one article that says professional help should be avoided. not one.
maybe you might have been a victim of "personal opinion" by an elder. but you cannot claim the organization backed that up.
no, never. i will never say he is good or bad. but unless your father is a robot, he has responsibility for himself and those under him.
you father did not have had a choice when he was downing mouthwash.at that point it was a disease. i acknowledge that. but what got him to that point?
accepting personal responsibility is one of the first keys to successful recovery in almost anything. in this regard i have much much more experience than you.
its not circular logic, its just logic you dont agree with.
DEFINITION
Circular Reasoning – supporting a premise with the premise rather than a conclusion.
Circular reasoning is an attempt to support a statement by simply repeating the statement in different or stronger terms. In this fallacy, the reason given is nothing more than a restatement of the conclusion that poses as the reason for the conclusion. To say, “You should exercise because it’s good for you” is really saying, “You should exercise because you should exercise.”
It shares much with the false authority fallacy because we accept these statements based solely on the fact that someone else claims it to be so. Often, we feel we can trust another person so much that we often accept his claims without testing the logic. This is called blind trust, and it is very dangerous. We might as well just talk in circles.
you are trying to warn me about this organization right? you made a claim and i looked into it. im telling you its not there. not one article that says professional help should be avoided. not one.
I am speaking of course about the "Memorial" where nobody feels the need to share in christ's command to take and eat --
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by smallpeeps
I am speaking of course about the "Memorial" where nobody feels the need to share in christ's command to take and eat --
I went to one, with my friends who were JW. It did seem strange to me. I mean if no one in the congregation is worthy, why bother having the ceremony?
I did not feel tempted to take anything off the plate and tried to avoid touching it. There is an explanation. I do not see any reason to knock them over it. Just do not go, and find a church that makes you feel comfortable.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
The UN drafts tons of "proclaimations" about various subjects that do not have any real teeth. They are basically drafted by a bunch of bureaucrats who sit around literally bicker for several years about a single word or point of semantics in one of their meaningless proclaimations.
And, when you've been born into it like Smallpeeps and me, it's not as easy as saying "oh, well, let's go to another church where we're comfortable.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
My aunt was DF'd from the SDA's and became a JW.