posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 06:38 AM
ok - part 2 of my critique of this
is it a known creature ?
IMHO - no , no known organism which could REASONABLY be credited with making an apperence in loch foyle , has the natural body shape required
my argument - at 0.05 - the " monster hump " is seen at its largest - and has an aspect ratio [ water line length / height ] of 2.85 : 1
ie - assuming for convenience that the height is 1m - the exposed section = 2.85m long
this rules out :
sea turtles - thier shells are relatvly flat
sturgeon - please review
known sturgeon
whales -no known wale has a
marine mamals [ dolphins etc ] - lack of fin
marine mamals [ seal / sealion etc ] - no marine mamal has a sufficient girth / length ratio to show this much of its body
sharks - lack of fin
other fishes - no fins and does not match the behaviour of any known fish
squid / octopus - previously unseen behavious - and inconsistent with thier means of locompotion
while almost all the creatures above CAN preform acrobatics and manouvers that put a large portion of thier body out the water - they are ACROBATIC
MANOUVERS - inconsistant with the small wake displayed in the vid
plus such acrobatics also reveal head / flipper / fin / fluke details
this vid - shows a lesuirly forward movement - steadily diving - with no other activity - sugesting what is below the surface
so - cryptid or hoax ?
as i show in previous post - a hoax is certainly possible [ PS - i did not include ROVs or such im my analysis - as thiey are expensive - compared to
the senario i present - require a support vessel - and ussually an umbilical ]
cryptid ? - i am more inclined to accept the posibility of an oceanic cryptid than any other [ loch foyle has a 28m deep chanel to the atlantic ] but
this vid just does not sit right with me