Protestant disinfo debunked-Catholics are also Christians

reply to post by NOTurTypical


I'm guessing 95% or so. It went off-topic after about page 2 or 3

Marry is not to be worshiped like she's some kind of God.

Originally posted by adjensen
The Bible wasn't written in English. No antichrist plagiarist is going to change that.

It was written in Greek. Jesous is the Greek spelling of Jesus. Yeshua is found nowhere.

And I assume it is Pastor Reckart you are calling an antichrist. He believes that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. Therefore he is not an antichrist. The Talmudic/Pharisee Jews that you are receiving your info from are antichrist.

Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by truejew

 

Show me it's used in witchcraft, I showed you how it's used in mysticism, show me how it's used in witchcraft.
Until you do, you're either lying, incorrect, or trying to push an agenda

ETA: this is off topic anyhow, carry your debate in another thread

edit on 8/20/2013 by HomerinNC because: (no reason given)

Do the research. It is used in Jewish and non Jewish witchcraft.

If you go back and read the entire thread, you would see that my first post was on topic. It was the attacks of Adjensen that took it off topic. I have tried to help get it back on topic a couple of times, but have long given up.

Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by truejew

 

Then according to Adjensen, you believe that God is not all powerful. Adjensen's ideas are silly, aren't they?

I never said God wasn't all powerful. What I said was he had no shortage of people stuffing words into his mouth and claiming it came from him.

I did not say that you did. I am on your side on this. I said "according to Adjensen".

Originally posted by lonewolf19792000

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by HomerinNC

 

Lol. This thread is now 125 pages.

It's gonna be off-topic at this point.

How many of those pages were continuous circle jerking?

That is not a Christian thing to say.

Originally posted by spartacus699
Marry is not to be worshiped like she's some kind of God.

Who worships marriage? Just joking.

I agree. Mary worship is Baal/YHWH worship.

Originally posted by spartacus699
Marry is not to be worshiped like she's some kind of God.

Show me ONE Thing that says Catholics worship Mary
Show me ONE THING from the Catchesm or papal bull that says Catholics worship Mary 'like a god'

reply to post by truejew

Do the research. It is used in Jewish and non Jewish witchcraft. If you go back and read the entire thread, you would see that my first post was on topic. It was the attacks of Adjensen that took it off topic.

I have tried to help get it back on topic a couple of times, but have long given up.

I dont have to do the research to prove your theory, YOU DO, you make a statement, you BACK IT UP WITH REFERENCES, such as I did

Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by truejew

 

Do the research. It is used in Jewish and non Jewish witchcraft. If you go back and read the entire thread, you would see that my first post was on topic. It was the attacks of Adjensen that took it off topic.

I have tried to help get it back on topic a couple of times, but have long given up.

I dont have to do the research to prove your theory, YOU DO, you make a statement, you BACK IT UP WITH REFERENCES, such as I did

I don't have to do anything. If you are really interested, do the research.

It is not polite to yell.

Originally posted by truejew

Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by truejew

 

Do the research. It is used in Jewish and non Jewish witchcraft. If you go back and read the entire thread, you would see that my first post was on topic. It was the attacks of Adjensen that took it off topic.

I have tried to help get it back on topic a couple of times, but have long given up.

I dont have to do the research to prove your theory, YOU DO, you make a statement, you BACK IT UP WITH REFERENCES, such as I did

I don't have to do anything. If you are really interested, do the research.

It is not polite to yell.

I'm pretty sure I already explained to you that shifting the burden of proof is a fallacy.

Originally posted by truejew

Originally posted by lonewolf19792000

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by HomerinNC

 

Lol. This thread is now 125 pages.

It's gonna be off-topic at this point.

How many of those pages were continuous circle jerking?

That is not a Christian thing to say.

Wow you're such a Pharisee, Paul wrote in Galatians that the Judaizers should cut their own balls off.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by truejew

Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by truejew

 

Do the research. It is used in Jewish and non Jewish witchcraft. If you go back and read the entire thread, you would see that my first post was on topic. It was the attacks of Adjensen that took it off topic.

I have tried to help get it back on topic a couple of times, but have long given up.

I dont have to do the research to prove your theory, YOU DO, you make a statement, you BACK IT UP WITH REFERENCES, such as I did

I don't have to do anything. If you are really interested, do the research.

It is not polite to yell.

I'm pretty sure I already explained to you that shifting the burden of proof is a fallacy.

Since the info is so easy to find, the burden of proof is his.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by truejew

Originally posted by lonewolf19792000

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by HomerinNC

 

Lol. This thread is now 125 pages.

It's gonna be off-topic at this point.

How many of those pages were continuous circle jerking?

That is not a Christian thing to say.

Wow you're such a Pharisee, Paul wrote in Galatians that the Judaizers should cut their own balls off.

Incorrect. The Pharisees were only concerned with their outward appearance. I am concerned with inward holiness.

reply to post by truejew


Get off your self-righteous high horse. The only righteousness you have is Christ's imputed righteousness. Get the plank out of your own eye so you can see clearly to remove the mote from someone else's eye. Don't call out someone for "unchristian like" speech, when the apostles said things like Paul did in Galatians which is a part of the Word of God. Even Jesus called a woman a dog, which was just about the most offensive thing one could say in that culture, and He made the comment that the Jewish leaders own mothers basically had sex with Satan.

Originally posted by truejew

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by truejew

Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by truejew

 

Do the research. It is used in Jewish and non Jewish witchcraft. If you go back and read the entire thread, you would see that my first post was on topic. It was the attacks of Adjensen that took it off topic.

I have tried to help get it back on topic a couple of times, but have long given up.

I dont have to do the research to prove your theory, YOU DO, you make a statement, you BACK IT UP WITH REFERENCES, such as I did

I don't have to do anything. If you are really interested, do the research.

It is not polite to yell.

I'm pretty sure I already explained to you that shifting the burden of proof is a fallacy.

Since the info is so easy to find, the burden of proof is his.

Nope, the burden of proof is always on the person who makes the claim. Which was you.

Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by truejew

 

Do the research. It is used in Jewish and non Jewish witchcraft. If you go back and read the entire thread, you would see that my first post was on topic. It was the attacks of Adjensen that took it off topic.

I have tried to help get it back on topic a couple of times, but have long given up.

I dont have to do the research to prove your theory, YOU DO, you make a statement, you BACK IT UP WITH REFERENCES, such as I did

Homer, you are dealing with a brainwashed member of a pseudo-Christian cult. Normal expectations of discourse do not apply here.

He never backs up anything with references, usually because he doesn't have any. If you press him hard enough on most issues, he'll spout nonsense and eventually just ignore the question. Everything that he blathers on about (his "on topic post" was saying that neither Catholics nor Protestants are Christians, because only members of his little cult are) comes from the mouth of the cult leader, Gary Reckart, whom I, and others, have documented as both stealing and altering actual academics' work, and simply making things up and presenting them as fact because they support his conclusions.

Originally posted by truejew

Originally posted by adjensen
The Bible wasn't written in English. No antichrist plagiarist is going to change that.

It was written in Greek. Jesous is the Greek spelling of Jesus. Yeshua is found nowhere.

"Jesous" is not a Greek word.

"Iesous", pronounced "ee-ay-soo", is the Greek transliteration of Yeshua, and everyone but the nitwits in your cult believes that.

And I assume it is Pastor Reckart you are calling an antichrist. He believes that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. Therefore he is not an antichrist.

Through his documented bigotry, hypocrisy, lying, hatred of others, arrogance and elitism, he proves through his actions that he does not follow the teachings of Christ. It is, therefore, not unreasonable to assume that he does not believe Jesus Christ came in the flesh, and uses your belief of that for his own benefit.

The man has an ego the size of a mountain, and you stroke it every time you repeat and defend his stupid claims.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by truejew

 

Get off your self-righteous high horse. The only righteousness you have is Christ's imputed righteousness. Get the plank out of your own eye so you can see clearly to remove the mote from someone else's eye. Don't call out someone for "unchristian like" speech, when the apostles said things like Paul did in Galatians which is a part of the Word of God. Even Jesus called a woman a dog, which was just about the most offensive thing one could say in that culture, and He made the comment that the Jewish leaders own mothers basically had sex with Satan.

It is through Christ that I have inward holiness that prevents me from using such language as lonewolf used.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by truejew

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by truejew

Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by truejew

 

Do the research. It is used in Jewish and non Jewish witchcraft. If you go back and read the entire thread, you would see that my first post was on topic. It was the attacks of Adjensen that took it off topic.

I have tried to help get it back on topic a couple of times, but have long given up.

I dont have to do the research to prove your theory, YOU DO, you make a statement, you BACK IT UP WITH REFERENCES, such as I did

I don't have to do anything. If you are really interested, do the research.

It is not polite to yell.

I'm pretty sure I already explained to you that shifting the burden of proof is a fallacy.

Since the info is so easy to find, the burden of proof is his.

Nope, the burden of proof is always on the person who makes the claim. Which was you.

The burden of proof is his. He is the one making the claim that goes against the evidence.