It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So instead of talking about "kids belong to the collective" someone wants to talk about that "conservative view" but who was it that marched children on stage and passed "gun control" in their names?
Originally posted by olaru12
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
I don't own my child, but I'm sure as hell responsible for his education, NOT indoctrination.
I belong where I choose to belong.
It's been my experience that children actually own the parents....
Originally posted by mac420
reply to post by Bioshock
What do you think a community is? A City? A County? A State? a COUNTRY!? These are all collectives. Nothing new. Stop making a big deal out of absolutely nothing.
It is art in a style that I employ: bold colors and high contrast.
Children should not be mowed down in a place of learning
That would be Obama that did that - and, yessir - hats off to him. You want to turn this into a game of ideologies and words?
We protect our children - we civilized folk
This thread is not about guns
there's a war been declared on anything even remotely smacking of left
Originally posted by coltcall
You can always tell who are the Bilderbergs and who are the socialists on welfare.
The ones always complaining about the Bilderbergs are the socialists on welfare.
It's not rocket science to tell the difference.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by coltcall
You can always tell who are the Bilderbergs and who are the socialists on welfare.
The ones always complaining about the Bilderbergs are the socialists on welfare.
It's not rocket science to tell the difference.
You sound like a corporate welfare queen to me and are a flame bait troll.
Take your koolaid nonsense elsewhere idiot!
Originally posted by coltcall
It's a dog eat dog world...the advantage of a socialist collective is that the big dogs can reach into the collective like reaching into a bag of M & Ms to snack on some munchies.
I don't get this mixing the word 'progressive' with the word 'socialist.' It should be degressive that fits better with socialists.......
Originally posted by mac420
reply to post by coltcall
Yes. All of those are correct. When you're in High School you assimilate the micro culture. You move on to University and there is new micro culture, You get a job you have to learn how to socialize and live in that environment.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by coltcall
It's a dog eat dog world...the advantage of a socialist collective is that the big dogs can reach into the collective like reaching into a bag of M & Ms to snack on some munchies.
I don't get this mixing the word 'progressive' with the word 'socialist.' It should be degressive that fits better with socialists.......
See if you knew anything about socialism you would know its about the workers owning the means of production and the state acting as proxy for them. There are mixed economies(canada and western europe) and there are public economies(ex-USSR).
Where the hell do you see the workers owning the means of production in america? Liberalism is about a welfare system attached to capitalism. I have grown sick and tired of explaining it to people who refuse to listen and enjoy hyperbole.