It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by Brother Stormhammer
What North Korea *could* do is launch a nuclear attack against non-continental US territory (Guam comes to mind) or against an ally (Japan or South Korea). In either case, the US response would (rightly) be apocalyptic.
You're ignoring the best delivery system of all. Sticking a large nuke inside a shipping container amongst other shipping containers on a cargo boat from a proxy origin, and detonating a nuke in a continental US port. If I was NK, this is how I would do it. Bypasses missile defense systems, is difficult to detect, and is within NK's current ability to do. Of course, you can bet the US generals are well aware of it too...
Originally posted by ChehystPewpur
not sure what this is worth to you guys but I'm just saying what I know. I don't think our govt is taking this as lightly as they say they are. reason for thinking so. I seen my first string of military dual rotor helicopters yesterday moving from the northern military base in my state to the south. and all day today they've had atleast one military chopper circling the GM building I work at. most likely due to the fact this plant is converted over to a tank plant during wartime. just sayin take it for what it's worth to you but I'm keeping my eyes open and ears to the ground.
Originally posted by thePharaoh
iv avoided these nkorea threads
but i got to weigh in...
what we have here, is a young hot head, with a red button.
i say not to provoke him..as hes authorised by his people, and has adopted a nuclear force
though i do sense that its all a big bluff...he can talk the talk, but if he was to launch an attack. i think he would become isolated and the world would back us, in serving some liberty
for queen n country
god save the queen
lol
peace
why cant we understand that everytime we sanction their people, he gains more support from them in justifying these "anxious" decisions
we need to teach them that what they have set up, is a reaction to negativity....where is the love
lol... i make myself smileedit on 4-4-2013 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)
How would I behave if i were in his shoes.
Originally posted by Jubilation T Cornpone
A lot of the focus seems to assume the nuclear threat potentially coming from a launched North Korean missile ...Kim Jong Un himself describes the method of delivery, however, as "lighter, smaller, and diversified".
www.huffingtonpost.com...
Given the relative limited range of their missile technology, might we be looking in the wrong place? The notion of there ever being the existence of a "suitcase nuke" has been debunked by many experts, but what if the delivery method is equally as diabolically compact and undetectable. Certainly, the statement "smaller, lighter and diversified" might lead one to believe that these warheads may not be mounted on a missile at all. Perhaps we are watching one hand and not paying attention to what the other one is doing. The map of nuclear targets that includes cities not just on the West coast, but also Austin, Texas and Washington D.C. would seem to indicate a longer range delivery method.
Completely disregarding the fact that a launched nuke or North Korean bomber plane would never make it over the Pacific without being intercepted, we underestimate Kim Jong Un and the North Korean Army at our own peril. I don't think it's any secret the rumors they've been potentially working with other rogue states on the development of a nuclear weapon. What if they've stumbled onto something that has become the catalyst behind Kim Jong Un's recent amped up bravado against the U.S., South Korea, and Japan?
What if higher ranking officials in U.S. (and other countries') intelligence know about it? And what if this threat is the reason behind the sudden bolstering of forces in the region from not just the U.S., but China and Russia as well, when in past instances the rhetoric has been dealt with on a more diplomatic level?
There is something very different and unsettling about this otherwise routine situation with DPRK this time around. And I'm pretty sure there is a lot more going on behind the scenes than the probably 10% we the public are privy to. We need only to observe current multi-national troop and supply movements to ascertain the seriousness of things right now in that region of the World. That China, their largest ally, has taken a hardline stance against the North Koreans' actions of late is telling.
I pray this situation can be diffused peacefully rather than ending in the mutually assured destruction of all parties on the Korean peninsula.edit on 4/5/2013 by Jubilation T Cornpone because: edited link
.
Originally posted by darpa999
I still do not understand why the US military has not pin pointed out Kim"s compound via satellite imagery for crying out loud and then send either FBI agents or the Navy SEALS Team SIX who took out Bin Laden. We have the technology for this, but we are not adopting it.
edit on 5-4Apr-132013 by darpa999 because: (no reason given)
3) Become a world citizen and take care of my people, even if it means one less play date with an American celebrity per year.
Originally posted by harbour45
reply to post by frazzle
See the thing is that you took my ONE post and my ONE comment and made it about something completely different from the topic of this thread even. I am on your side….I know that the ones in the background are the ones really running the show and so on and so on, I don't need to be educated about that but thanks.
I totally agree with your friend and I haven't ever been there and don't ever want to go. They are TRULY EVIL and I wish there was a way for all those gov tyrants to be shot up by their own nukes they hide behind. We have seen a glimpse here and there of what they've done to their own people (when someone manages to sneak a camera in the wrong direction) but we can't truly grasp the horrors those millions of poor defenseless people go through every single day of their miserable lives. The last article I read about NK involved the discovery that some people are starving so badly that some have resorted to eating their own children….it sounds absolutely crazy but I can bet it's true. So sicking isn't it.
Originally posted by nightbringr
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by Brother Stormhammer
What North Korea *could* do is launch a nuclear attack against non-continental US territory (Guam comes to mind) or against an ally (Japan or South Korea). In either case, the US response would (rightly) be apocalyptic.
You're ignoring the best delivery system of all. Sticking a large nuke inside a shipping container amongst other shipping containers on a cargo boat from a proxy origin, and detonating a nuke in a continental US port. If I was NK, this is how I would do it. Bypasses missile defense systems, is difficult to detect, and is within NK's current ability to do. Of course, you can bet the US generals are well aware of it too...
And of course this is their only current means of delivery. One things experts unanimously agree upon is that North Korea is years away from miniaturization small enough to mount on a missile, artillery or even air dropped bomb add they do not have bombers nearly large enough.
No idea why so many people here believe NK is capable of launching nuclear capable missiles or artillery. Almost every single article released on this subject states this fact. Building the bomb is half the work, miniaturization is the other half.
The Terrorist Threat in Cargo Containers
Two years ago, South Korea's busiest port installed a $3.5 million scanner to check U.S.-bound shipping containers for nuclear weapons. The machine sits idle, however, because truckers won't drive through it. They're afraid of radiation exposure. That means about 1.9 million containers left Busan for American ports last year without U.S.-mandated screening. Singapore and Hong Kong, the world's busiest and third-busiest ports, also don't participate. Fewer than 1 percent of the 14.5 million cargo boxes reaching the U.S. by water are scanned abroad for terrorist threats, the U.S. government says.
thursday 4th has passed please close thread
White House won't be surprised if NK launches missiles