North Korea Approves Nuclear Strike On America

A nuclear attack or for that matter an attack of any kind by Kim Jong-Un's military will certainly lead to all out war. The important thing to remember is that North Korea are way behind South Korea and America in terms of military advancements. Did anyone see the most recent state-sponsored army training videos? It was like watching Dads Army it was that comical. I think deep down Kim Jong-Un knows that he can verbally attack his enemies but at the same time he must be aware that his military would be overpowered even though its strength is well over 1,000,000 if he decided to go to war. He is young and experienced but worryingly unpredictable however I would be very surprised if anything comes of all this.

reply to post by ProfessorT


Don't underestimate North Korea's abilities. When my grandfather was sent to Korea in 1953, his mission was to rectify issues within the supply chain for US forces in Korea (which were an absolute fiasco) and to help catch "Bed Check Charlie". "Bed Check Charlie" was basically what they called small Russian fighter planes that would pummel camps with fire in the early morning and then, disappear without a trace. Basically, they were using guerrilla tactics using fighter planes. We didn't "win" the Korean War--we ended up in a stalemate and signed a ceasefire. Not even a peace treaty. Nobody won the Korean War and that's why it's called the "Forgotten War" because it's just not good for national pride. Even though we have a lot more technology today, if we were absolutely confident that we could stuff N. Korea like a turkey on Thanksgiving, we would've done that by now. Their equipment may be crap still but they are experts at guerrilla warfare and have the Chinese to back them--just like last time.

Originally posted by tony9802

Originally posted by Britster1821
This came in a few hours ago, but it's from CNBC. Just Google this headline, and you'll find some other news sources.

twitter.com...

But it does appear that NK's army has final approval for a nuclear attack on the US.
The ball is in their court, I suppose.

Or we could just end this very quickly ourselves, and drop the bomb first lol..

My question is who the final approval actually comes from.. They received an approval from other nations?

Western countries couldn't nuke the capital city where there are embassies and consulates.

In any case, conventional bombs like Tsar Bombe, Fuel-Air-Explosives and ground-penetrating missiles would be more practical. My preference would be cryo-bombs which would contain liquid nitrogen and just freeze brittle the target area. Then any shrapnel bomb would just smash the place up

North Korea

its all poker faces at the mo

look, the dude cant do anything relevant
hes using the nuclear card for negotiations against sanctions...or as he sees it, the nukes support his rights. as his father probabaly taught him

there is a million ways to deal with these characters...which i why i want to ask...are we provoking him into making a wrong decision, while hes still naive and inexperienced?

i say support his people with free trade, you know, the get rich dreams... our sanctions only make it harder for us, and it also forces his hand.

i say...isolate the man, not the country...give power to the people through trade rights, while comming down very hard on any miitary/dictatorship decisions he makes...

their people are strong...but dont be fooled by the discipline, everyone needs a future to believe in...sell them the american dream...or rather, ram it down their throats...

ok i`l stop here... im sure our people have this on lock...

peace

reply to post by ProfessorT


USSR fell due to discontent among people.
It is hard to discern discontent among NK populace, but it is probably very high too.
NK does trade with China and Russia, both far wealthier than NK.

It is a case of implosion. The regime is no longer sure it can control its people. Curtains down for North Korea.

Originally posted by Char-Lee

You're ignoring the best delivery system of all. Sticking a large nuke inside a shipping container amongst other shipping containers on a cargo boat from a proxy origin, and detonating a nuke in a continental US port.

Ok, so you obviously didn't read my post because that's exactly what i said they would have to do.

They don't have a nuke miniaturized enough for a missile our artillery yet, and they don't have a bomber big enough to drop a "little boy".

If they use one, it will be clandestinely.

Originally posted by stormcell
In any case, conventional bombs like Tsar Bombe, Fuel-Air-Explosives and ground-penetrating missiles would be more practical. My preference would be cryo-bombs which would contain liquid nitrogen and just freeze brittle the target area. Then any shrapnel bomb would just smash the place up

I'm sorry, are you for real? You DO remember there are people living there, right? Real people, women, men, grandparents, little children who know nothing at all ... I mean, maybe it's just me but you make it sound like a video game, which it is not.

Originally posted by stormcell
In any case, conventional bombs like Tsar Bombe,

Uhm, Tsar Bomba was anything but conventional. It was the largest nuclear weapon detonated on the planet. They reduced the yield from 100 megatons to 57 megatons during the one test that was completed.

Since the end of the Korean War 60 years ago, the government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea) has repeatedly put forward virtually the same four proposals to the United States. They are:

1. A peace treaty to end the Korean War.

2. The reunification of Korea, which has been “temporarily” divided into North and South since 1945.

3. An end to the U.S. occupation of South Korea and a discontinuation of annual month-long U.S-South Korean war games.

4. Bilateral talks between Washington and Pyongyang to end tensions on the Korean peninsula.

The U.S. and its South Korean protectorate have rejected each proposal over the years. As a consequence, the peninsula has remained extremely unstable since the 1950s. It has now reached the point where Washington has used this year’s war games, which began in early March, as a vehicle for staging a mock nuclear attack on North Korea by flying two nuclear-capable B-2 Stealth bombers over the region March 28. Three days later, the White House ordered F-22 Raptor stealth fighter jets to South Korea, a further escalation of tensions.

www.globalresearch.ca...

UN wants a united capitalist korea, NK wants a united communist korea. America and the UN are the ones squeezing NK and NK retaliates the only way they know how; big words! But corner a snake enough and it will eventually bite.

There is no good reason for a yearly training excercise with SK-USA that lasts 2 months close to NK border.

reply to post by EarthCitizen07


You are close, except, you are forgetting what SOUTH Korea wants. SK does not want to be a united communist country with NK, which is why the US and the UN are squeezing NK. See, we are trying to support SK from the little fat man bully.

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

You are close, except, you are forgetting what SOUTH Korea wants. SK does not want to be a united communist country with NK, which is why the US and the UN are squeezing NK. See, we are trying to support SK from the little fat man bully.

I don't think NK would ever make the first move on SK or against the USA. They might like a unified communist korea but at the same time they are realist enough to know the SK people have a big say in what kind of unified korea should be formed.

All I am saying is there is no reason for squeezing "the young" NK leader into launching nukes everywhere. I doubt his # works properly but who wants to take the chance at thousands or millions dying? If NK was such a big threat they should have been taken out before they had the chance to develop nukes. But the UN focused on iraq that never had nukes.

If north koreans want communism then they should have it. UN has no business threatning nations unless they have 90% proof of imminent disaster and uncalled for aggression. UN and USA are the ones squeezing, not NK! They just want to be left alone to trade with russia, china and other friends.

reply to post by EarthCitizen07


The problem is, from what we can gather from inside NK, the dictator is starving the people. It more humanitarian than political.

Plus he keeps threatening everyone. SK is on alert because they know he's cray cray.

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

The problem is, from what we can gather from inside NK, the dictator is starving the people. It more humanitarian than political.

Plus he keeps threatening everyone. SK is on alert because they know he's cray cray.

Why would he starve his own people? Do you think NK is like the USA in this regard; indifference to starvation?

The UN and USA are the ones putting relentless pressure on NK to get people angry enough so that they topple the system and forcefully accept capitalism and then unite with SK into one korea. It resembles the siege of corinth of ancient times. Slow and painful, then add some B-2s flying nearby to add insult to injury.

Give me a break. If the rest of the world was communist and USA was the only country that wanted capitalism, don't you think USA would act the same if not worst? I think they would! Cuba has sufered similar choking restrictions.

Don't get me wrong in that I dislike communism quite a bit, but STILL we should respect sovereign nations choosing political systems for themselves. Most americans don't like the UN telling them what guns they can own either. The UN has become tyranical of late with codex alimentarius and the small arms treaty, as well sanctioning socialist/communist and non-secular nations that are outspoken.

The UN consists of World Bank and Bilderbergers(billionares and trillionares). It is not a peaceful organisation anymore.

Originally posted by ProfessorT
A nuclear attack or for that matter an attack of any kind by Kim Jong-Un's military will certainly lead to all out war. The important thing to remember is that North Korea are way behind South Korea and America in terms of military advancements. Did anyone see the most recent state-sponsored army training videos? It was like watching Dads Army it was that comical. I think deep down Kim Jong-Un knows that he can verbally attack his enemies but at the same time he must be aware that his military would be overpowered even though its strength is well over 1,000,000 if he decided to go to war. He is young and experienced but worryingly unpredictable however I would be very surprised if anything comes of all this.

I read that their army is exceptionally well trained and on top of the million they have 7 million more on standby.

They don't actually have the range to hit CONUS or the accuracy to hit Guam or Hawaii.....Might not stop them launching it of course and if they do all hell may well break loose!

reply to post by Char-Lee


Yeah but the other 7 mill are conscripts. Mostly farmers with crappy training and crappy weapons. They are more like cannon fodder than anything else. That's just my opinion I could be wrong.

Number one rule of war: NEVER underestimate your enemy. You may say that NK has a poor military; but provoking NK will force Russia, China and POSSIBLY Iran (if they feel this is the best time to attack). The U.S. MUST learn to respect its enemies and put down that 'uneducated redneck' image it has spewed across the world. Nobody likes us, not even our allies. The people of Europe see us as obese trailer trash that believe hunting animals is a 'manly' thing to do.

We need to stop and think for a moment: if we're on the edge of war against North Korea, we must make peace with one of these nations. Rome has fallen and it is time to humble ourselves as China steps up as the world leader.

We must not stand up for people based on their religion, ethnicity or appearance - but on their situation. We can not afford to make the same mistake as we did in Iraq.

Regards,

Stock Loc

reply to post by Char-Lee


You think a country forced into cannibalism by starvation will be able to keep a couple million fighting soldiers with jamming soviet weapons alive for long? It would be a slaughter. Our drones alone could end a war in a few days.

reply to post by ProfessorT


in the videos they are showing of RPG-7s... those can't even penetrate a modern day tank.