posted on Mar, 15 2013 @ 04:16 AM
I used to work in food and drink retail, years ago when my getting ID'd would have been halfway understandable, from age 18 to 19. I had to ID
people for booze and cigarettes. But that was at our own behest as employees. We were expected to make an assessment of each individual, and only ID
people that looked like they were under the actual age, at which sale of the products concerned would have rendered us in violation of statute.
The policy of IDing everyone, or anyone who looks to be less than two decades older than statue requires, is not appropriate. I should also mention
that from the ages of seventeen to twenty five, I was NEVER ID'd for anything, beer, cigs, products containing dangerous chemicals, or anything. It
is only in the last three years that I have ever been ID'd, and on both the recent occasions, it has been done by people who have known of my regular
patronage at the bar, and the convenience store involved. It has been done to fill a quota in the case of the store, and because of a totalitarian
policy in place at the bar, not because there was any risk to the store or bar concerned, from allowing me to purchase thier products.
Using a policy which demands that employees learn a life skill, like assessing a persons probable age from thier physical characteristics, is
sensible, and fair. Using a policy which requires ALL customers to produce ID, or requires all people who do not look like they just fell out of a
retirment village sitcom to be ID'd is not appropriate. ID requests should be made under the express understanding, that they are being made on a
case by case, person by person basis.