It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by solomons path
Originally posted by winofiend
reply to post by sdcigarpig
We penalise the public customer because we as management hire idiots who serve to minors.
Got it, sounds legit...
How is the customer penalized exactly? By having to pull two cards out of their wallet? The info isn't sent anywhere . . . the register reads the DOB and allows the transaction. End of story.
Originally posted by Signals
So, the Circle K convenience store close to my house has recently started to enforce some new "company policies".
A little back story- I am, well, let's say I'm over 40. I doubt anyone with a lower level IQ on this planet would mistake me for being under 21, excluding a blind person. I stop in this store EVERY DAY on my way home from work. I work for a beer distributor, and have actually delivered beer to this store in the past. All of the clerks know me....
Anyway, a few months ago they started to enforce a policy of checking everyone's ID...everyone. Even a little old lady with walker and blue hair. I can deal with that, even though common sense is completely thrown out of the window.
Logic is the enemy and truth is a menace!
Now, not only do they check my DL, they are required by "management" to scan it on their swipe machine. When asked, the clerk said "it's our company policy and the machine verifies if your ID is valid".
Where is my ID information being stored and for how long?
Who is seeing this information?
How much police state are you willing to put up with?
Circle K was also the first retailer to adopt the use of electronic age verifiers and are placing them in all stores. These devices simplify the process of confirming the validity of an ID by reading the magnetic strip or bar code on the back of drivers licenses. The devices also reduce the chance of human error in calculating the purchaser's age by displaying it automatically for our clerks. New store employees receive training before they begin working at Circle K, including how to recognize fake IDs and how to refuse a sale. Circle K's policy is to ask for proper identification from anyone who looks 30 or younger.
Here's the kicker -
September is National Preparedness Month (NPM), a nationwide effort sponsored by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Ready Campaign in partnership with Citizen Corps. We are pleased to announce Landrum Human Resource Companies is taking part in this nationwide effort to help the communities we serve prepare for emergencies. This year, NPM focuses on encouraging you and other Americans to take active steps toward getting involved and becoming prepared. Preparedness is everyone’s responsibility. We have to work together, as a team, to ensure that individuals, families, and communities are ready.
www.circlekgulfcoast.com...
FEMA, HUH ?
So, I'm about ready to say to Hell with Circle K and drive out of my way to get what I want.
Thoughts?
Originally posted by Signals
Originally posted by solomons path
Originally posted by winofiend
reply to post by sdcigarpig
We penalise the public customer because we as management hire idiots who serve to minors.
Got it, sounds legit...
How is the customer penalized exactly? By having to pull two cards out of their wallet? The info isn't sent anywhere . . . the register reads the DOB and allows the transaction. End of story.
No, you don't get to decide "end of story"...
If the register is reading my DOB....
And of course in your opinion not saving any of my personal info
Then why in the Hell does the clerk even bother looking at it first?
Do you understand the process of slow takeover tyranny?
I think not.
Originally posted by solomons path
Originally posted by Signals
Originally posted by solomons path
Originally posted by winofiend
reply to post by sdcigarpig
We penalise the public customer... Got it, sounds legit...
How is the customer penalized exactly? By having to pull two cards out of their wallet? The info isn't sent anywhere . . . the register reads the DOB and allows the transaction. End of story.
Now, I will admit there are some things that I see as "scary" possiblities, such as adding RFID to IDs or things like the PASS ID (basically a national internal passport) . . .this technology "steals your info" . . . you are free to stop going to Circle K or stop purchasing age restrictive items . . . unless you like to employee the victim mentality.
Now if you want to warn against the policy of "age limits" to begin with and their relation to government overreach and the proliferation of "nanny state" policies . . . that's a different discussion and one we might both agreement on.edit on 3/15/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)
READ THIS INFO
Yeah.... So, I'll stop going to Circle K... and I suggest other do so as well..edit on 15-3-2013 by Catalyst317 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrSpad
Most places do this. Just validates its is real and limits the chances of getting shut down or fined for selling to a minor. Nothing more simple than just having the clerk scan every ID so they do not have figure out if it is legit.
Originally posted by Catalyst317
Originally posted by solomons path
Originally posted by Signals
Originally posted by solomons path
Originally posted by winofiend
reply to post by sdcigarpig
We penalise the public customer... Got it, sounds legit...
How is the customer penalized exactly? By having to pull two cards out of their wallet? The info isn't sent anywhere . . . the register reads the DOB and allows the transaction. End of story.
Now, I will admit there are some things that I see as "scary" possiblities, such as adding RFID to IDs or things like the PASS ID (basically a national internal passport) . . .this technology "steals your info" . . . you are free to stop going to Circle K or stop purchasing age restrictive items . . . unless you like to employee the victim mentality.
Now if you want to warn against the policy of "age limits" to begin with and their relation to government overreach and the proliferation of "nanny state" policies . . . that's a different discussion and one we might both agreement on.edit on 3/15/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)
READ THIS INFO
Yeah.... So, I'll stop going to Circle K... and I suggest other do so as well..edit on 15-3-2013 by Catalyst317 because: (no reason given)
I also noticed you deleted portions of what you actually quoted to make it seem like it says something else . . . That make you, at best, intellectually dishonest . . . Let me, once again, and without your creative editing skills quote those two paragraphs.
Now, I will admit there are some things that I see as "scary" possiblities, such as adding RFID to IDs or things like the PASS ID (basically a national internal passport) . . . however, scanning or in AZ's case swiping your ID to verify age and authenticity or the unreliablity of minimum wage workers who could care less about getting a retailer fined doesn't fall into that category, either.
If you want to believe such or disbelieve that this technology "steals your info" . . . you are free to stop going to Circle K or stop purchasing age restrictive items . . . don't drink, don't smoke, don't use porn, quit frequenting establishments with age limits, etc. It's your choice to engage in those activities, even if addicted, it's still your choice . . . unless you like to employee the victim mentality.
I realize that accuracy and truth, let alone responsiblity or intellect, are not th hallmarks of the facebook/twitter generation . . . However, don't twist my words or creatively reconstruct my position . . . T&C and site motto may bite you in the end.
"Each post of each thread contains a "copyright" link that clearly specifies the method in which the material may be shared, distributed, modified, or used. "
edit on 3/15/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)edit on 3/15/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)edit on 3/15/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)
don't drink, don't smoke, don't use porn, quit frequenting establishments with age limits, etc. It's your choice to engage in those activities, even if addicted, it's still your choice . . .
Originally posted by solomons path
reply to post by Catalyst317
Did you just "quote" me or was that also a response to me? If so, what was significant about what you "quoted"?
Being clear as to your intent helps.edit on 3/15/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Signals
reply to post by solomons path
don't drink, don't smoke, don't use porn, quit frequenting establishments with age limits, etc. It's your choice to engage in those activities, even if addicted, it's still your choice . . .
Yeah, I see where you're coming from now.
Loss prevention, huh?
When in doubt, attack the poster, works almost every time.
Originally posted by mailboxuser2009
That would be just odd if I would go there once in a while, but I was a frequent shopper. By the fifth time he should be familiarized with me and my age already.