It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cosmic4life
I would like to know by what other means you think NK may be producing Plutonium (genuine question..not being sarcastic)
Also NK has had centrifuges since 2008 if not before ... remember A Q Khan ?
For a low-yield weapon in the kilo-tonne range that can be carried aboard a missile Uranium is the obvious choice for NK.
Originally posted by Zerschmetterling
BREAKING: North Korean Foreign Ministry warns of unspecified 'second and third measures' after nuke test
interesting day so far
Originally posted by Cosmic4life
reply to post by Bedlam
Thank-you for the prompt and informative reply.
Yeah I know Khan is Pakistani...but there is a voice at the back of my head telling me Khan approached the NK back in the day... i may be wrong on that, but I'm pretty sure.
C...
Originally posted by neformore
Why do people who live in nuclear armed countries who are regularly involved in wars and military actions around the world want to protest a country testing a nuclear weapon?
Hypocrisy much?
Originally posted by R_Clark
There are theorists who claim that these 'tests' caused earthquakes in Chile and NZ.. That they are propagated to vibrate to other (targets) places on Earth...
Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by SloAnPainful
Yep.
As did the USA, USSR, Britain, France, China, India, Israel, South Africa and Pakistan.
Or conversely, explain to me why those countries were justified, but NK isn't?