It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Daedalus
reply to post by JimTSpock
tiny wings, and a small airframe do not necessarily mean fakery, or an inability to perform in combat..
I tend to agree.
“implausible aerodynamics and Hollywood sheen” and was laughably small for a fighter jet.
Originally posted by inj3ct0r
Iran is a very stupid country.
What is the damn point in 'faking' a fighter?
Did they think they will scare away the US and IDF forces?
edit on 4-2-2013 by inj3ct0r because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JimTSpock
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
No. Iran cannot design and manufacture a jet fighter which can compete with the US or Russia. They can't build a 5th gen fighter. Only a few countries in the world can do this and they are not one.
To think they can is fantasy and not realistic.
Originally posted by hp1229
If they have such a long lived culture and designed algebra then why aern't they leading the Aerospace industry? Just curious.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
reply to post by cass1dy09
Iranians are smart, their culture is long lived and they designed algebra, assuming they are unable to break design concepts with new and improved is flawed, it can happen!
Originally posted by JimTSpock
Originally posted by Daedalus
reply to post by JimTSpock
tiny wings, and a small airframe do not necessarily mean fakery, or an inability to perform in combat..
Yes they do. This thing is obviously fake.I tend to agree.
“implausible aerodynamics and Hollywood sheen” and was laughably small for a fighter jet.
www.globalsecurity.org...
The A-4 didn't have small wings at all. The F-104 is from the 50's. Even the F-16 is much bigger than this thing and that is supposed to be a lightweight fighter.
We're talking about 2013. Look at some 5th gen jets (or even 4th gen) and compare. That might be more interesting and relevant.
I think the old Lockheed F-104 Starfighter would be better than this thing. That was one sharp pointy fast jet, not great at turning though because of the small wings.edit on 4-2-2013 by JimTSpock because: add
Originally posted by Glassbender777
I can smell the model airplane glue and paint just from looking at that picture. LOL. I really dont think a rotary table could even support a real plane. Ive made rotary tables for the LA and Detroit car shows and just dont think its possible with the engines in the plane.
Originally posted by OperationIraqiFailure
Originally posted by inj3ct0r
Iran is a very stupid country.
What is the damn point in 'faking' a fighter?
Did they think they will scare away the US and IDF forces?
edit on 4-2-2013 by inj3ct0r because: (no reason given)
The point is, the US is in damage control mode.
Hey, I wonder what happend to that US Sentinel Drone that was "shot down and crashed"?
Doesn't look too damaged to me. Oh, but that's just another "fake" the Iranian's made, right?
Put your try pants on.
Lima-1, out.
Iran’s cutting-edge Fighter a hoax, critics claim