Curious Canadian Couple Visits Newtown, CT One Month After Shooting

reply to post by FlyersFan

try to understand that no 6 year old child is going to be comfortable sitting in a classroom, knowing that 26 people (most of them his/her own age) had been brutally murdered.

Oh, please. If you'd go back and actually read my comment, you'll see that I suggested that the school be transformed into something else such as an animal shelter instead of being torn down.
I NEVER SUGGESTED THAT THE SCHOOL REMAIN FUNCTIONING AS A SCHOOL.

Originally posted by theAnswer1111
reply to post by xEphon

 

I don't want to be rude, but your response sounds so scripted that if I had a dollar for every time I heard that same exact thing I'd be flyin' to Hawaii right now.

You keep hearing the same thing because it's probably right.

reply to post by DelMarvel
Please tell me what is right about what was said. "We" are not fabricating any conspiracy at all. After combing through every possible resource and losing hours of sleep looking into the facts and glaring holes in all of the info, it is apparent that there is some EVIL activity going on here. Call it Satanic if you want but if you can't sense the evil I will certainly hope you wake up soon.

I appreciate that members here have been fairly civil in this thread. There has been some unnecessary name calling and bickering, but it's natural. I can tell you one thing that I know for a FACT. That fact is that the only way to find the truth and live a prosperous life is to work together.

Nobody can fully start the awakening process until they first remove the divisive wall between truth seekers and skeptics, democrats and republicans, etc.

Your regularly scheduled program will return after these brief messages...

Wake Up!

reply to post by Brocade


Is there a diagram or a map of the interior of the school somewhere out there? I'd like to know where the kitchen is and I'm also curious about Room 9. It said on the scanner that one of the injured teachers was from Room 9 or at least that's what it sounds like to me.

Originally posted by theAnswer1111
reply to post by DelMarvel

 

Please tell me what is right about what was said.

All of this:

Originally posted by xEphon
... these conspiracies are being produced from basically nothing (minor inconsistencies in a mountain of evidence), are more complex and unbelievable than what you're claiming is unbelievable, and all the while using as 'proof' media sources, blogs, and second hand accounts that you say cannot be trusted, except when it somehow fits your fabricated conspiracy? And all this while discrediting the mountain of evidence that paints a pretty clear picture of what really happened.

It's almost as if you've come to the conclusion first, and will do whatever it takes to make your data fit.

I also resent the constant implication that anyone who disagrees with any conspiracy theory no matter how far fetched is somehow not "awake." I try not to be but I'm to the point where I almost automatically dismiss any input from someone claiming to be "awake." In the context in which it is used it is essentially a meaningless claim.

Originally posted by DelMarvel


I also resent the constant implication that anyone who disagrees with any conspiracy theory no matter how far fetched is somehow not "awake." I try not to be but I'm to the point where I almost automatically dismiss any input from someone claiming to be "awake." In the context in which it is used it is essentially a meaningless claim.

Ever notice how it is generally newer members that throw around the phrase "wake up"? I find it to be quite interesting.

reply to post by DelMarvel
I understand your rejection of my usage of the term "awake". I'm happy to use another term that you feel comfortable with. How about informed...

reply to post by captaintyinknots
It's an easily understood term that apparently is unacceptable for use around astute "skeptics" that just so happen to show up right on cue to belittle highly intelligent people that actually know what they're talking about.

When I say "awake" or "wake up" it means:

Get with it, pay attention, get on top of things.

Source

Originally posted by theAnswer1111
reply to post by captaintyinknots

 

It's an easily understood term that apparently is unacceptable for use around astute "skeptics" that just so happen to show up right on cue to belittle highly intelligent people that actually know what they're talking about.

edit on 2/1/2013 by theAnswer1111 because: (no reason given)

Or its a bunch of new people who think they have all the answers, and will eventually learn that they are not special, or any smarter than anyone else. Yep, it's probably that.

See, lots of us have been around for quite some time. We've seen this same pattern on multiple events. We've seen how it always goes the same way-new member signs up due to interest in an event, new member comes up with grandiose theories but doesnt bother to back them with anything; new member calls those that point out the lack of evidence or logic a 'troll', a 'shill' or says that they are asleep and need to wake up.

older member has a chuckle at the new member.

Same way every time.

But, since you implied that you are far more intelligent than the rest of us, please, share some evidence to back any of your theories. Ive been asking for it for a month and a half. Not one of you 'geniuses' have come through with any.

reply to post by captaintyinknots
I have plenty of great info that cannot be posted here to to the extreme controversy. I'll keep my facts to myself in this case. It's nothing special, and I'm not special. I don't come up with "grandiose" theories...

I use facts, common sense, public resources, and other great tools to find nothing but the facts.

And please, for the love of ALL members, new and old, do not belittle people. Enough said.

Besides, I have been visiting this site for nearly 4 years now and you have no idea who I am or what I know. Period.

Originally posted by theAnswer1111
reply to post by captaintyinknots

 

I have plenty of great info that cannot be posted here to to the extreme controversy. I'll keep my facts to myself in this case. It's nothing special, and I'm not special. I don't come up with "grandiose" theories...

I use facts, common sense, public resources, and other great tools to find nothing but the facts.

And please, for the love of ALL members, new and old, do not belittle people. Enough said.

Besides, I have been visiting this site for nearly 4 years now and you have no idea who I am or what I know. Period.

I dont belittle people. I call out bunk theories. There is a big difference. Although, perhaps you should take your own advice....

It's an easily understood term that apparently is unacceptable for use around astute "skeptics" that just so happen to show up right on cue to belittle highly intelligent people that actually know what they're talking about.

The truth of the matter is, if you have substantial evidence, it wont get you in trouble. The reason that you cant post your 'evidence' here is because it is baseless, factless, and probably implicates the innocent people that had their world shattered by this event.

Considering that you, yourself admitted that you joined this site solely due to Sandy Hook...nevermind. This isnt about you, nor should it be. Turning the focus to a personal sniping match does not change the fact that there still has not been presented one single bit of solid evidence to back any theory...

Same old same old.

Originally posted by theAnswer1111


And please, for the love of ALL members, new and old, do not belittle people. Enough said.

Originally posted by theAnswer1111

I don't want to be rude, but your response sounds so scripted that if I had a dollar for every time I heard that same exact thing I'd be flyin' to Hawaii right now.

Originally posted by theAnswer1111
The MSM are trying to make the Sheeple think that the 'Sandy Hook Truther Movement is "Losing Steam".

Originally posted by theAnswer1111
If you can't wake up now than you're doomed and forever blind to the light.

Obvious hypocrite is obvious....

Calling all "De-Bunkers"...

reply to post by theAnswer1111




What you are showing there is pretty standard procedure in a situation like this. They cannot have the 100's upon 100's of parents all jamming the firehouse. It would be utter chaos. so they keep everyone moving through the building from entrance to exit while they look for their children.

then back to the start.


All that video shows is a bunch of horrified parents trying to find their kids.

reply to post by captaintyinknots
Please provide documents that show that that is "standard procedure".

I'm waiting...

reply to post by theAnswer1111
We've seen photos from inside the firehouse, and footage from outside.
In total, one might spot a dozen or two children, not counting the "iconic" Evacuation photo.
Essentially, a few hundred students that should be seen are no where in sight, considering the scene was blocked off so quickly.

What do you think of that?