Curious Canadian Couple Visits Newtown, CT One Month After Shooting

I'm pleased to share this fantastic article featured on Professor James Tracy's personal blog. It offers some fresh and interesting insight about the community after the tragedy.

James Tracy is the Professor who was lashed at by Anderson Cooper for questioning the events that transpired the day of the incident. I think James is a Hero and is the newest warrior in the battle for truth.

We all just want clear details - that's all. Us "Truthers" are not out to hurt people. I personally apologize on behalf of anyone that has gone too far by harassing people etc.

Here is the article. Please visit James' blog for the rest of the story.

My partner and I became fed up with the mainstream media’s depiction of what took place in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. So on January 20 we traveled there from our home in Ottawa Canada in an effort to visit the sites and respectfully approach the locals.

We spent January 21 in Newtown visiting the Sandy Hook School and Sandy Hook Volunteer Fire House, Gene Rosen’s residence, the 100 Church Hill Restaurant (and pub), the Newtown Bee offices, as well as the Newtown Police Department.

Very good read, thanks for posting!

It's awesome to see so many people raising questions, and some even taking it as far as travelling to another country to find out the truth.

memorygapdotorg.files.wordpress.com..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>
Just a coincidence, right?
Star and flag, great thread

reply to post by thesmokingman
It certainly raises some eyebrows...

reply to post by chronicTRE
I also thought it was a great read. It's nice to have a sneak peek with new pictures of the school and surrounding area.

I usually don't make threads involving the Sandy Hook subject because of the extreme controversy - but this needed to be shared.

Great find, it was nice to read something from the average persons Inquisition into things.
I find it strange how the newspaper editor responded with so little defense of his town and even newspaper. And also the 'life-long local' couple from the diner not commenting further once the tragedy was mentioned... this seems very off to me in relation to common human nature, especially in such small communities where everyone knows everyone and enjoys talking about anything and everything.
My conclusion is that even the curious visiting inquisitors, upon investigating, left with even more questions than they came with... hmmm

maybe i missed something, but did they decommission the building? boarded up, signage removed, surrounded with a fence? no way in hell it's STILL a crime scene a month on...

what gives?

reply to post by theAnswer1111


There blog raises no more questions than it answers. How is the school being boarded up a conspiracy? I'm fairly certain I wouldn't send my 6 or 7 year old kids to school in a building where 20 of their classmates were killed....this ACTUALLY happened....something about it doesn't seem right. I'll concede that. But kids were ACTUALLY killed...why do these idiots feel it is their duty to come down there and make sure for all of you?

Originally posted by Daedalus
maybe i missed something, but did they decommission the building? boarded up, signage removed, surrounded with a fence? no way in hell it's STILL a crime scene a month on...

what gives?

Oh...I don't know....20 KIDS were freakin' shot to death there.....seems reasonable to me that it's still closed...

This all seems fishy to me !

The thing is we all know and have quite solid proof that our country's have lied to the public before to push agendas so why on earth should I trust what they say now.

Once bitten twice shy.

As long as they can convince 80% of the public they will continue to get away with the lies they spin. But when that % starts to reduce it will become interesting. I have studied the vids on Sandy Hook and like anybody that was not there on the day cannot say what actually happened. But after watching the farther laugh before he was interviewed by the media i am 90% sure he was acting and the other thing was the Sandy Hook Medical examiner ! just watching this guy sent shivers down my spine, the BS was just spurting from his mouth.

On the blog the OP posted:

When I scrolled down to the photo of the pictures of children's hand prints on the window, my stomach turned. I have a horrible feeling that went straight to the pit of my stomach. Something is terribly wrong there in Sandy Hook, and it goes WAY beyond just a shooting story. I have strong intuitive feelings that a certain group in SH is harming a small group of children and using them for spiritual practices. That's all I am going to say.

Another thought:

SNOPES is not a reliable source of information. It is run by two bloggers from their home, and I do not take their "information" as credible, no more than I would from a site like Before it's news. I cannot believe the Newton Bee referred them to Snopes.

reply to post by Thunder heart woman
I also felt ill when I saw that. Also notice how the Hair Salon abbreviates its name to 'Shh...' As in keep quiet?

You know what I am feeling? That these children were used in a satanic rite and that parents were involved. This would explaining the smiling faces and lack of shock when this tragedy happened. It would explain a lot to me.

If no one believes that children can be ritualistically abused and killed, please contact a local therapist who specifically works with children and teenagers who have been abused this way. It does exist, and parents have been known to be involved in groups who do this to their children. It is very sick and disturbing.

i read somewhere on the net that they are thinking of knocking it down.if he did,nt have a rifle on him how were only .223 shells found?.

reply to post by Thunder heart woman
It's a horrible what goes on under our noses. One example is the McMartin Preschool Trial:

The McMartin preschool trial was a day care sexual abuse case of the 1980s. Members of the McMartin family, who operated a preschool in California, were charged with numerous acts of sexual abuse of children in their care.

Source

I'm sure there are some threads on ATS.

Interesting sign at the school, proclaiming no entry and that "VIOLATORS WILL BE PROSUCETED". Don't the people that make signs have spell check?

Originally posted by Daedalus
maybe i missed something, but did they decommission the building? boarded up, signage removed, surrounded with a fence? no way in hell it's STILL a crime scene a month on...

what gives?

maybe they don't want conspirecy nuts running around the area.....maybe, they've already had so many people questioning every little detail in an accusatory manner, that they no longer want to talk about it, and are mad at this couple, who, may have been the 200th person doing this.

Originally posted by Thunder heart woman
Another thought:

SNOPES is not a reliable source of information. It is run by two bloggers from their home, and I do not take their "information" as credible, no more than I would from a site like Before it's news. I cannot believe the Newton Bee referred them to Snopes.

edit on 30-1-2013 by Thunder heart woman because: (no reason given)

The Newtown Bee published their first story quoting a woman (the principal) who had been killed-- they fabricated the story!!! The author of the story has not been fired or reprimanded for publishing blatant lies and the editor who approved the story is still employed by the publication. That being said, why would anyone believe one word published by the Newtown Bee. Their explanation/correction of the story was less than forthcoming. IMO that publication should not be trusted nor one word believed.

reply to post by NickDC202
Last time I checked the Google Cache had been scrubbed of that story entirely...

Really makes you wonder.