It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Drills connected with 9/11, Aurora and Sandy Hook, not a coincidence, and we don't need their condenscending abuse by lying in such disgusting ways.
Originally posted by ajay59
Were I Sherlock Holmes, I would entertain the idea that Adam Lanza was ended at home along side his mother and his body was moved to the scene of the OTHER crime. But of coarse, I am not Holmes now, am I?
Now why would Lanza wear a mask again?......hmmmmmedit on 21-1-2013 by ajay59 because: to add
Adler's attempts to seduce Sherlock are interrupted by government officials who have come to collect him and deliver him to Heathrow Airport. Sherlock remembers Mycroft mentioning "Coventry" on the phone and reminisces about the allegations that the British government allowed the Coventry Blitz to happen, so as not to alert the Germans that their military codes had been cracked. His suspicions that a similar situation is occurring are confirmed by Mycroft; the US and UK governments have decided to fly a 'dummy plane' full of corpses so as not to alert the terrorists while avoiding casualties. However, as Sherlock unwittingly helped Adler and therefore Moriarty crack the code, the scheme was foiled. Adler reveals a list of demands to Mycroft, including protection, in exchange for the release of the information on her phone. Adler further taunts Sherlock by revealing that he meant nothing to her. However Sherlock realises she is lying, as he previously took her pulse that proved otherwise. He opens the phone with the password "SHER" (so that its screen reads "I am Sher-locked"). With her leverage gone, Adler pleads for protection, as she is unlikely to outrun her enemies, but Sherlock and Mycroft turn her down.
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by BrandonD
I agree with you. But Im sorry. I dont know how else to think of someone who insinuates that children didn't die and the emotions of those families are fake. That is what is so disgusting to me.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by Starling
Forgive my question, dear Overlord, but what is the point of this forum, ATS, if members of the general public and members of ATS are not allowed to debate their opposing views about SH, here, on this site?
Where are we supposed to do this...on MSM?
The action would not be unprecedented. We often remove new topics on the "No Planes" theory with regard to 9/11, and all known pre-existing threads on that subject are in the hoax forum.
Frankly, lately I loath visiting ATS for fear of another stupid Sandy Hook thread that is embarrassing to all those who seek to create smart topics on ATS.
Seriously... I'm close to losing faith.
edit on 20-1-2013 by SkepticOverlord because: typo
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
This level of utter maddening stupidity (not specifically this thread) has caused the ATS staff to consider an indefinite moratorium on all topics related to the massacre at Sandy Hook.
Get a grip people.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by Starling
Forgive my question, dear Overlord, but what is the point of this forum, ATS, if members of the general public and members of ATS are not allowed to debate their opposing views about SH, here, on this site?
Where are we supposed to do this...on MSM?
The action would not be unprecedented. We often remove new topics on the "No Planes" theory with regard to 9/11, and all known pre-existing threads on that subject are in the hoax forum.
Frankly, lately I loath visiting ATS for fear of another stupid Sandy Hook thread that is embarrassing to all those who seek to create smart topics on ATS.
Seriously... I'm close to losing faith.
edit on 20-1-2013 by SkepticOverlord because: typo
Originally posted by sirjunlegun
reply to post by bknapple32
I agree with you. But Im sorry. I dont know how else to think of someone who insinuates that children didn't die and the emotions of those families are fake. That is what is so disgusting to me.
This seems to be the premise of every post you make. And I have read a lot of them because it seems SH are the only threads you reply to like its your job. Then you make a thread about being called a shill or what ever that rambling dead roses of a thread was. The only other thing i have seen you post is a thread about how you escaped scientology after only three months of spending everybody elses money around you because they are allbrich and famous and money is no object. But I could be debunked becaused with candor I am telling you your constant deflecting to your premise and then your projection that everyone on here is some wingnut that does not believe they died is to me and many disgusting and I could care less to see what else you have written.
It is just as tiring to for us to discuss this with questions only to have you even show up. This does not settle right in our guts. And outside of the talking heads people on the street whk probably don't even know about ATS or GLP say manh things just do not add up. People are sick and tired of the nonsense that keeps going down and at an unprecedented rate. I wish a true statistician and probability PhD, hell a Vegas bookie could give ms the probability of people just suddenly going out into the public and in just a short amount of time shooting people. I d say it is improbable. I cant think of nobody hut israel who has dealt with suicide bombers have experiencd this.
It jst does not sit right and for people to talk about like we should just accept it happened and move on MAKES ME SICK. IT IS NOT NORMAL TO KILL CHILDREN AND THE ONES WHO ARE HAVING A HARD TIME ACCEPTING ARE THE NORMAL ONES!!!!!
People need to discuss tragic things. Every psychologist in the world will tell you that. Some people on here have questikns and need to be reassured and showed why they are wrong in a thoughtful caring visually exlanatory way so they can heal too. Maybe they got some father at home like you who tells them they disgust him every time they question something. Maybe you did. Maybe you should change your name and avatar to Archie Bunker.
He was A GREAT SKEPTIC. You ever watch him because we have been seeing a lot of him kn here lately. Oh boy have we!!!!!edit on 21-1-2013 by sirjunlegun because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by BrandonD
I agree with you. But Im sorry. I dont know how else to think of someone who insinuates that children didn't die and the emotions of those families are fake. That is what is so disgusting to me.
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by soulwaxer
There was evidence behind what the 3rd Reich was doing. There is only assumptions and straw grasping from crappy news reporting thus far like this topic... and ooh ya. Telling that dad how he should react to his daughter dying
Originally posted by LordAdef
Hi everyone,
I can't really understand what is SO disgusting in such threads. I can't really understand why ATS owners are SO appalled by then. I joined ATS for its premise of thinking out of the box, in a Conspiracy forum... A forum is a place where people raise questions and debate then.
NO ONE can't deny that IF Sandy Hook was in CONGO, none of this censorship would be happening....
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by LordAdef
It was a mistake by cnn in the ludicrous race to get the scoop. That simple.
As for why it ticks so off, read his other posts on the topic. He explains it fairly well.
And I think he'd care about anyone claiming 26 women and children who were massacred, just faked it all. But u don't speak for him, so that's only my guess.
Originally posted by R_Clark
This has the hallmarks of the greatest story of 2013.. Great catch, Op.. 5 stars, flag, and a kitchen sink..
Originally posted by LordAdef
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by LordAdef
It was a mistake by cnn in the ludicrous race to get the scoop. That simple.
As for why it ticks so off, read his other posts on the topic. He explains it fairly well.
And I think he'd care about anyone claiming 26 women and children who were massacred, just faked it all. But u don't speak for him, so that's only my guess.
Bk, it's not 'that' simple...The race for the scoop lead cnn to broadcast a wrong place? I have to tell you this: I work for the third biggest TV Broadcast company in the world, so i believe I can tell you that 'this' mistake is bizarre... Or CNN is really falling apart with incompetent employers...
Concerning the 26 women and children can you deny what I stated in the underlind sentence? Was Sandy Hook massacre in CONGO.. Would ATS censoring the threads?
Cheers
Originally posted by bknapple32
Originally posted by LordAdef
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by LordAdef
It was a mistake by cnn in the ludicrous race to get the scoop. That simple.
As for why it ticks so off, read his other posts on the topic. He explains it fairly well.
And I think he'd care about anyone claiming 26 women and children who were massacred, just faked it all. But u don't speak for him, so that's only my guess.
Bk, it's not 'that' simple...The race for the scoop lead cnn to broadcast a wrong place? I have to tell you this: I work for the third biggest TV Broadcast company in the world, so i believe I can tell you that 'this' mistake is bizarre... Or CNN is really falling apart with incompetent employers...
Concerning the 26 women and children can you deny what I stated in the underlind sentence? Was Sandy Hook massacre in CONGO.. Would ATS censoring the threads?
Cheers
Yes I believe cnn really is that bad.