It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by humphreysjim
reply to post by dave_welch
The conspiracy theories began instantly, before any talk of gun control started, and would continue regardless. It's what you guys do after every major event that makes the news.edit on 21-1-2013 by humphreysjim because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by humphreysjim
reply to post by olaru12
A little more evidence and a little less insanity?
Originally posted by Swills
There was actually a drill happening some 20 odd miles away. There's a recent Sandy Hook thread where a naval officer is being interviewed who talks about it, & it's been discussed in some other ATS threads as well. Many YT videos that discuss the conspiracy of Sandy Hook also talk about the drill and its location. The YT video that's been goin around recently (with 10 + million views) has this info.
Originally posted by OneisOne
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Once again, CNN has been caught lying, or at the very least participating sloppy journalism.
You are right, CNN is practicing sloppy journalism, but so is Intelhub.
I re-read the article and they state this video clip aired during the morning. It did not. It was the opening clip for Anderson Cooper's show at 8pm that night.
Here is the link for the video on CNN's website.
and here is the transcript for the show.
The Intelhub also does not state that there was a threat at St. Rose school that day and just refers to it as a drill.
Originally posted by humphreysjim
Originally posted by soulwaxer
Your exact words: "A lone nut shooting up a school is not extraordinary, unfortunately, faking it is."
Not extraordinary = ordinary
How is that twisting your words (which you conveniently omitted from my quoted post).
And even if you meant something different, I am not responsible for your lack of writing skills.
If you were familiar with the term "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", and where and why it originated, you would understand that it refers to claims that are unlikely due to their very nature, rather than me implying that it's a perfectly normal thing to do.
I am not responsible for your ignorance of something I'd expect you to have heard a million times.
Even if you were ignorant of the statement above, the word "ordinary" can refer to "commonplace", or it can refer to "normal". Given that it has multiple meanings, you could at least have given me the benefit of the doubt before assuming I was saying something as ridiculous as "it's perfectly normal and fine to shoot kids"
Some astounding ignorance and disingenuousness being displayed here.edit on 21-1-2013 by humphreysjim because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
I don't know if I'd call this a "smoking gun", but it does certainly cast even more doubt on the events in Sandy Hook.
I am becoming more and more curious about the Sandy Hook theories floated on this site, not necessarily because they are chock full of facts and 'undeniable proof' as people like to say around here, but because of the activities of the federal government and various state governments with regard to gun control because of it.
.......
I am starting to think there might be more to this. A lot more.