It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darkphoenix77
Originally posted by malachi777
reply to post by Darkphoenix77
Have you ever thought about moving? I am sure there is some plot of land on this planet where you don't have to live with all this secret conspiracy garbage.
Why should I have to move? This is my country, I was born here, raised here, and already live here. I think it is more reasonable to find a nice vacation spot for anyone trying to burn the Constitution.
Originally posted by malachi777
As a responsible gun owner, ...
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by nenothtu
Then I watched the video of Carney.
Straight out of his own pie-hole, it sounds like they are about to declare an undeclared war. Need to watch the announcement tomorrow, to see what is actually said.
Well just tune into the Rush Limbaugh and it will at some point be interrupted by the dope show.
Originally posted by malachi777
reply to post by nenothtu
Hogwash! Did you just walk into a drivers license office and tell them you demand your license? You did have to take a driving test didn't you? Laughable!!!!!!
Originally posted by JuniorBeauchamp
Originally posted by nenothtu
Hint from the real world - you can't have the degree of "control" you espouse WITHOUT a Secret Police apparatus. Luckily for you and your comrades. we already have the DHS in place, ready to go...
The NSA, DHS, CIA, Justice Dept. and ATF already serve as "secret police".
Originally posted by CristobalColonic
You sure have to be an irrational, fretful and somewhat loony people to think a handgun will save you from governmental "tyranny".
Originally posted by nenothtu
Yes, one would, if that were the thought process. Thankfully, it's not. Your argument is a reduction to the absurd, which no one is arguing in favor of, so why do people keep arguing against it?.
If Americans are so scared of their leaders subjugating them, why stay in the country?
Because it's our country. Would you voluntarily abandon your own house to invasive hooligans?
Originally posted by nenothtu
Because it's our country. Would you voluntarily abandon your own house to invasive hooligans? if so, where do you live?
Originally posted by larphillips
I'd love to give you more than one star for this reply. It's sad that it even has to be said, but well done sir!
Originally posted by malachi777
How many people can a hammer kill in just seconds?
Militia? We are not living in the 1700's anymore.
Originally posted by malachi777
reply to post by JuniorBeauchamp
If you think you will win a gun fight against our police or military, you better wake up! Frankly, if I were a local government law enforcement official, you would be one I would keep an eye on.
Originally posted by malachi777
reply to post by JuniorBeauchamp
You must be retarded, because they are not easily concealed. It takes some pretty serious positioning so you don't cut yourself. Example, haven't you been wondering where your little friend went?
Oh I did that wrong, that last quoted line was what I wanted to respond to you.
Originally posted by nenothtu
No experience carrying a machete either,
Mine is Salvadoran, but close enough I suppose. I can conceal it very easily, but am at a loss as to why I would. No one bothers me when I carry it openly
You sound like one of those silly little "gangstas"
Originally posted by Druid42
reply to post by nenothtu
And I'm gonna stay off your lawn as well.
It's people like you that bring backbone into the conversation. A solid position, and commended.
Originally posted by superman2012
reply to post by flyandi
well Hitler did the same thing in 1938 and we all know how that ended.
While I don't believe anyone can tell you what you should be allowed to do, especially if you are responsible, you might want to brush up on your history. If you are referring to the Feinstein Bill and are comparing it to Hitler's gun control policy, although they are similar, Hitler's policy was an extension of post-World War I gun control measures set on Germany by the Allies to keep Germany from militarizing itself.
The proposed Feinstein assault weapons ban itself doesn’t call for confiscation, and would in fact allow owners of any banned guns to keep their weapons when/ if the bill goes into effect. A Connecticut lawmaker is calling for background checks to buy ammo, but this is in no way in the “confiscation” vein.
Hitler, then, came into power when this regulation was in effect … so, yes, Hitler, by default, did have a gun control policy — but only because it was forced on Germany.
I'm not defending this monster, only showing you that the thing most often repeated by the pro-gun people is a fallacy.
Originally posted by Druid42
reply to post by nenothtu
Most people don't realize the Patriot Act gave all that to the DHS.
*Yoda voice*
Control, the DHS has.
Answer to the DHS, you do.
*end Yoda voice*
Originally posted by CristobalColonic
I would have thought permitting military grade firearms for a loose cannon proletariat predicated upon rationale as ridiculous as the fear of the world ending last month, who are known to protest even when stuffing their faces with junk food is denounced, would have been a better example reductio ad adsurdum...
Your country? How glibly patriotic and geographically arbitrary
Some may argue Iraq is Iraqis' country for far more ardent reasoning than the Native American's America is any yank's. Yet I doubt few Iraqis would pass up a free ticket to elsewhere, given the opportunity.
Hooligans? Your "tyrannical" government that's 'forcing' you to be armed to the teeth are mere... hooligans? A smidgen extreme, no; strapping RPGs to one's back for sake of hooliganism...?
Maybe Americans should take a trip to Afghanistan or Syria and see what real tyranny is