It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"I have executive powers over guns..." - It's starting...

page: 18
116
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 07:41 PM
link   
The 4th, 5th and 10th Amendments of the Bill of Rights have already been trampled on.

These Statists hate the Constitution for it stands against everything they are for.

And make no mistake about it, they will keep their relentless attack on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and "We the People" until they have destroyed them all.

The only thing holding them back is the 2nd Amendment.
edit on 15-1-2013 by JuniorBeauchamp because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 07:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by malachi777
reply to post by JuniorBeauchamp
 


How many people can a hammer kill in just seconds? That is a very, very weak argument, my friend. Militia? We are not living in the 1700's anymore.


edit on 15-1-2013 by malachi777 because: Added content


How about someone bombing a building and killing 19 children at once? No guns were involved. Murrah building in OKC. Hmm.

Take away guns, people can find many many other ways to kill, and kill people on a massive scale. A deadly gas could be released in a subway system, IUD's set up on a busy road, a bomb in a shopping mall..... the ways to kill are endless. Taking guns is not the issue anyway, it's about controlling people.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 07:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thunder heart woman
So, Obama plans to surround himself with children during his announcement. Maybe someone should show Obama photos of dead children he kills with his drones in Pakistan.


That rat could care less about the "children", they are nothing but "human resource units" to the leftist statists, to be exploited for his and the statists agenda and personal power.


edit on 15-1-2013 by JuniorBeauchamp because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 07:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thunder heart woman

Originally posted by malachi777
reply to post by JuniorBeauchamp
 


How many people can a hammer kill in just seconds? That is a very, very weak argument, my friend. Militia? We are not living in the 1700's anymore.


edit on 15-1-2013 by malachi777 because: Added content


How about someone bombing a building and killing 19 children at once? No guns were involved. Murrah building in OKC. Hmm.

Take away guns, people can find many many other ways to kill, and kill people on a massive scale. A deadly gas could be released in a subway system, IUD's set up on a busy road, a bomb in a shopping mall..... the ways to kill are endless. Taking guns is not the issue anyway, it's about controlling people.


Exactly! Someone can take a good, sharp Honduran machete and take out 20 defenseless people in a matter of minutes.

You are right, it's about controlling people.
edit on 15-1-2013 by JuniorBeauchamp because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 07:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by JuniorBeauchamp

Originally posted by Thunder heart woman
So, Obama plans to surround himself with children during his announcement. Maybe someone should show Obama photos of dead children he kills with his drones in Pakistan.


That rat could care less about the "children", they are nothing but "human resource units" to the leftist statists, to be exploited for his and the statists agenda and personal power.


edit on 15-1-2013 by JuniorBeauchamp because: (no reason given)


He has pretty much proven his love for children, hasn't he? If he loved them so much, he would not bomb the crap out of them or their families.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 07:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thunder heart woman

Originally posted by JuniorBeauchamp

Originally posted by Thunder heart woman
So, Obama plans to surround himself with children during his announcement. Maybe someone should show Obama photos of dead children he kills with his drones in Pakistan.


That rat could care less about the "children", they are nothing but "human resource units" to the leftist statists, to be exploited for his and the statists agenda and personal power.


edit on 15-1-2013 by JuniorBeauchamp because: (no reason given)


He has pretty much proven his love for children, hasn't he? If he loved them so much, he would not bomb the crap out of them or their families.



Yeppers and the rat will do the same here if it comes down to it.

The traitor in chief put the drone attacks on steroids and could care less about those children or non-combatant civilians.

Yeah, he brought change all right. I guess that's his way of contributing to Agenda 21.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 07:59 PM
link   
reply to post by flyandi
 


Obama is just the puppet they're using to push the anti gun agenda.
This is just my opionion but anything I say here has at least some possibility of truth behind it. More than that, actually.
Obama is not even legitimately POTUS. He was never vetted so we never saw his college transcripts. They're using that to completley control him. If the truth had been disclosed he never would have been elected the first time. And beyond that, there's the executions of those three gay men from Obamas church during the primary. Never solved. And Obama's personal trainer that was always so close to him. What was with that? Again, if we had ever been told the truth about this guy he would never have been elected.
Was he even re elected? There was massive voter fraud and electronic ballot tampering in the key swing states. The math doesn't add up. He got stronger than expected numbers from a disinterested base as well as demographics that were not supporting him, like the young and the seniors.
From day one he pushed through an agenda that was handed to him and played along. He's a stooge, an empty suit, a puppet.
So look beyond this creature and look at whos propping him up. There's talk of selling off huge chunks of federal land to the FEDERAL RESERVE if the country can't pay its debt. BINGO! Bankrupt the country and sell it off. Take away the peoples right to fight if they don't like America being dismantled. And we'll all pay higher taxes while they get everything they want. And flood us with illegals to drive down everybodyd wages and disrupt the vote and pad the welfare rolls.
Since both parties are controlled by the same group there's not much you can do. You cna't even vote them out anymore since the elections are suspect. But you can start grass roots resistance against them. Ignore their decrees and refuse to follow their dictates. Keep your eyes open when they go after those who speak out against them. Defy them at every turn. Educate yourself on who they are. Talk to others online and offline. We still have a free internet but might not for much longer. They'll close it down too if they think its a threat. They already have the papers and are shutting them down. Cable news and the national media are lost.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thunder heart woman

Originally posted by JuniorBeauchamp

Originally posted by Thunder heart woman
So, Obama plans to surround himself with children during his announcement. Maybe someone should show Obama photos of dead children he kills with his drones in Pakistan.


That rat could care less about the "children", they are nothing but "human resource units" to the leftist statists, to be exploited for his and the statists agenda and personal power.


edit on 15-1-2013 by JuniorBeauchamp because: (no reason given)


He has pretty much proven his love for children, hasn't he? If he loved them so much, he would not bomb the crap out of them or their families.



You dont really think that those killer terror cell folks care about your kids or theirs do you? Or any ones children?



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:04 PM
link   
Obama doesn't trump the founding documents of this land.

Obama is total evil, like all our Presidents who work for the centeral banks.

OUR FOUNDERS WARNED US!

Do not believe in Government, it wasn't built to protect our flesh.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:23 PM
link   
reply to post by flyandi
 




Since weeks I am puzzled how this could play out in the United States. I saw a couple of SHTF scenarios and how it would turn out, however I think it's going to be a slow choppy process - taking one right away at a time - and I hope that people realize that.


"The illegal is just something that the PTB do immediately. It's the unconstitutional that takes a little longer."

" Everyone needs to get organized for anarchy immediately ".
edit on 15-1-2013 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:29 PM
link   
reply to post by malachi777
 
This is correct, instead of redcoats, we now face predator drones,abrams tanks, night vision, and assault rifles, and if you protest to loudly, you are a terrorist and now we have N.D.A.A. so we will just be dissapeared, no questions asked.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:37 PM
link   
reply to post by JuniorBeauchamp
 


Time does matter, such as the case of these poor babies who were massacred by a tyrannical, evil psycho! The police arrived quickly and did not wait to rush in to stop this fool! Some of you are so paranoid and irrational! You need to seek some serious help. Your comments prove you are not in the right state of mind to own these weapons or any weapon for that matter. Threatening to fight against our government with guns? You seem to forget that these weapons are no match for our military's weapons. Your comments are laughable! hahaha...and foolish.

In the real world, we put up a fight legally, voting in those who fight for their constituents. See that? Without violence! If you think you will win a gun fight against our police or military, you better wake up! Frankly, if I were a local government law enforcement official, you would be one I would keep an eye on.




posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by malachi777

Relax! I personally, would never dream of purchasing an AK 47. Why not? Because I have no need for one. If I need to defend myself with my pistol, I will do so with one bullet at a time. If I use an AK 47, it would be overkill and I would be charged with murder, not self defense.


You do realize that the AK that 99% of gun buyers can afford and legally obtain only fire one bullet at a time, just like your pistol, right???



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:42 PM
link   
reply to post by malachi777
 
our elected officials seem very intent on keeping their constitutional oath, cant we tell by the way they never violate the amendments they swore to uphold.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by malachi777
reply to post by JuniorBeauchamp
 


Time does matter


No it doesn't.

The pages of history are littered with tyrants.

Technology changes but not tyrants.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:45 PM
link   
reply to post by JuniorBeauchamp
 


You are correct and machete's are not allow to be carried around in our school's or any city neither. Try walking down a sidewalk in your town with a machete, and let's see if you don't get stopped by law enforcement.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by malachi777
reply to post by JuniorBeauchamp
 



In the real world, we put up a fight legally, voting in those who fight for their constituents. See that? Without violence!


That is the preferred method.

But when that fails, the 2nd Amendment was installed to defend against tyrants.




Frankly, if I were a local government law enforcement official, you would be one I would keep an eye on.



Yeah, you sound like a Statist shill.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by malachi777
reply to post by JuniorBeauchamp
 


You are correct and machete's are not allow to be carried around in our school's or any city neither. Try walking down a sidewalk in your town with a machete, and let's see if you don't get stopped by law enforcement.



Are you that retarded?

Machetes are easily concealed.

Just admit it, you are a Statist shill.
edit on 15-1-2013 by JuniorBeauchamp because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by GradientWell
anytime anyone mentions NWO i immediately want to remove my name from the thread and burn my harddrive until there is just Solid as a rock proof that these people exist i just cant indulge in that argument and i wont.


well just go right ahead. I assume that was a swipe at me. Would video of various leaders talking about the NWO openly be proof enough?

Heres the YouTube of Bush sr talking about it. He expressly talks about the UN Founders.




Here's Kissinger saying Obama will be great for bringing in the NWO



Here Obama talks about giving kids in other countries a "Stake in the kind of world order" he thinks we all would want.



So that's just three right there, there are others.

You know it's a bit like looking in the sky and seeing the sun and saying I just don't believe there really is a sun.



posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 08:47 PM
link   
reply to post by chopperswolf
 


Are you standing outside their offices telling them that you will be sure they will not be voted in again? Are you emailing and calling them, informing them of your dis-satisfaction with their views? Didn't think so.




new topics

top topics



 
116
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join