It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Target food is a failed idea to be correct.
Target Food is NOT an idea, its an observed event, revealing patterns and instinct within EVERY species.
OMG stating that Target Food is wrong is not the same as proving it wrong. Besides, you claimed I never posted the theory on here, so how could you possibly prove something wrong when you don't even know what the theory is, or are you lying?
Evolution is not used in science, only adaptation.
I know enough about evolution to know that its fantasy. I know enough to know that no one has ever witnessed a species changing into another species. I know enough to know that there is no proof that we share a common ancestor with apes. I know enough to know that speciation is assumed from groups of species no longer breeding with the original group, which isn't proof.
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by Connector
Sounds fair to me
We will have to debate who as I expect there will be a long line more than willing to stand.
Originally posted by Connector
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by Connector
Sounds fair to me
Excellent!
My work and lifestyle doesn't allow me to be dependable posting here, so I must decline the challenge, but perhaps one of the members that have been active in debating him will step up. You, stereo, Barcs, idmonster, itero, flyingfish, etc. should talk and decide which it will be.
Tooth are you game???? This is your chance to really hit one outta the park for your theory of TF
~ETA~ Just saw your edit and I agree 100%edit on 3-2-2013 by Connector because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by stereologist
False, the eating habbits and patterns I have observed, have also been observed by other people as well. As an example...
Another lie. TF is a fantasy believe by apparently only 1 person.
paleohacks
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by stereologist
Like I have already stated three times now, the reasoning behind my posts is to hopfully find someone that can disprove Target Food.
I won't however simply accept simple things like its false, or fake, or can't be proven. Someone somewhere has to be able to prove it false, and they should be able to do so without cheating and wihtout moving the goal posts.
Not my post at the bottom, the post on the top.
I am stunned !!!!!
To show that "other people" have observed the same thing as you....you link to an post written by.....You!
I did, and some people didn't believe that I was the author of the theory, and insisted that I stole it from someone, and when they couldn't find an author, or prove it wrong, they insisted on closing the thread down.
Then start a thread asking peolpe to prove your crappy little brain spasm of an idea wrong and stop wasting everybodies bandwidth.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by idmonster
I did, and some people didn't believe that I was the author of the theory, and insisted that I stole it from someone, and when they couldn't find an author, or prove it wrong, they insisted on closing the thread down.
Then start a thread asking peolpe to prove your crappy little brain spasm of an idea wrong and stop wasting everybodies bandwidth.
It just goes to show you that some people are babies when they don't get their way.
Originally posted by Connector
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by Connector
Sounds fair to me
Excellent!
My work and lifestyle doesn't allow me to be dependable posting here, so I must decline the challenge, but perhaps one of the members that have been active in debating him will step up. You, stereo, Barcs, idmonster, itero, flyingfish, Split, XYZ, etc. should talk and decide which it will be.
Tooth are you game???? This is your chance to really hit one outta the park for your theory of TF
~ETA~ Just saw your edit and I agree 100%edit on 3-2-2013 by Connector because: added more members for the challenge
Originally posted by flyingfish
Originally posted by Connector
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by Connector
Sounds fair to me
Excellent!
My work and lifestyle doesn't allow me to be dependable posting here, so I must decline the challenge, but perhaps one of the members that have been active in debating him will step up. You, stereo, Barcs, idmonster, itero, flyingfish, Split, XYZ, etc. should talk and decide which it will be.
Tooth are you game???? This is your chance to really hit one outta the park for your theory of TF
~ETA~ Just saw your edit and I agree 100%edit on 3-2-2013 by Connector because: added more members for the challenge
I guess that leaves me out I can't even spell Hypocrisy
The further a species is from its target food, the wilder its choice is.
Which still doesnt agree with you as it refers to the varied diets of Robins and a Goats preference to eat pretty much anything other than what it would find in its usual habitat.
Goats are reputed to be willing to eat almost anything, including tin cans and cardboard boxes. While goats will not actually eat inedible material, they are browsing animals, not grazers like cattle and sheep, and (coupled with their natural curiosity) will chew on and taste just about anything resembling plant matter to decide whether it is good to eat, including cardboard and paper labels from tin cans.[20] Another possibility is goats are curious about the unusual smells of leftover food in discarded cans or boxes.
A domestic goat feeding in a field of capeweed, a weed which is toxic to most stock animalsAside from sampling many things, goats are quite particular in what they actually consume, preferring to browse on the tips of woody shrubs and trees, as well as the occasional broad-leaved plant. However, it can fairly be said that their plant diet is extremely varied, and includes some species which are otherwise toxic.[21] They will seldom consume soiled food or contaminated water unless facing starvation. This is one reason goat-rearing is most often free ranging, since stall-fed goat-rearing involves extensive upkeep and is seldom commercially viable.
False, there is infomation in there that is gold. The patterns of diets chosen by such a wide range of species, and the fact that all units of a species are found to be eating the same things, proves evolution wrong. You see, it is a choice, a choice this is made, but its a choice that obviously has strict direction.
Most of that site is conjecture relating to animal diets and fills a need in the people who post there to hark back to simpler times. I read the entire board and found no scientific evidence therein that disproved, or even seemed to want to disprove evolution.
I dont know why you linked to it as it was irrelevant.
LOL, Target Food was already taken to a debate forum. The people on the forum were so jelous of the theory that they worked on getting it closed down, since they couldn't prove it wrong.
Here's your chance.....are you confident enough to take TF to the debate forum?
The forum for target food is still posted, but closed.
I guess that leaves me out I can't even spell Hypocrisy
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Connector
LOL, Target Food was already taken to a debate forum. The people on the forum were so jelous of the theory that they worked on getting it closed down, since they couldn't prove it wrong.
Here's your chance.....are you confident enough to take TF to the debate forum?
But they did however tell me that they didn't believe that I was the author of Target Food and they were sure that I stole it from someone. LOL, right.